UFO or pterodactyl over Argentinian lake?

article said he took a few pictures so where are the others?

I swear that's that spy plane thing, that's used for Iraq?

Hmmm...UFO, pterodactyl, or spy plane. I vote for UFO. (or maybe even 'photoshop').

I thought it looked like an F14 "Tomcat" doing a roll maneuver at first...But then I realized no sensible pilot would dare doing such a risky maneuver so close to any surface. Looking at it closely, i looks more like a bird taking off...

It may of been a Argentinian Joke or Add for a new Meat Resturant?

The article says he goes there to look at swans, look at this pic of a flying swan: I think this is a photo of a swan flying away from the camera:

I think it looks a lot like a bird too. It is probably so blurry, because in the original pic, it was probably just bigger then a dot. Probably taken at long range of a bird coming in for a landing and he got excited because it looked to be hovering. Probably because it was coming right at him.

That, folks, is a crack in the windshield.

I bet thats the ticket ! P,Noun!

i'm not saying that all well taken pictures are little green men driving their porsches. hoaxes are definitely out there aplenty. however, whenever there's a fairly good photo they'll always go, "there's definitely some form of logical explanation to this". well, maybe it doesn't require any form of explanation to it because the brain gives you the reasoning of what the viewer wishes to see in that photo. a very good example is the 2 face/vase illusion. the unexplained is afterall, unexplained. be it a ufo, bird, whatever. to enforce their own skeptic/debunking ideals on a photo isn't very far... [More]