Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Palaeontology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Palaeontology

Did prehistoric birds fly with four wings ?

By T.K. Randall
March 15, 2013 · Comment icon 14 comments

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons
Some of the earliest birds may have taken to the skies using a set of four wings instead of two.
Birds started to appear around 150 million years ago and were descended from therapods, a group of dinosaurs that included Tyrannosaurus Rex. It isn't clear exactly how and why the ability to fly appeared however it is generally thought that the first wings would have been used for gliding between the trees before they developed full flying capabilities.

One major difference in some of the earlier bird species was that, based on fossil evidence, these earlier fliers had large feathers on both their fore and hind limbs suggesting that they flew using two sets of wings. Over the next few million years however these additional wings would have slowly been lost, eventually leaving just the one set that we see in modern birds today.
Roughly 150 million years ago, birds began to evolve. The winged creatures we see in the skies today descended from a group of dinosaurs called theropods, which included tyrannosaurs, during a 54-million-year chunk of time known as the Jurassic period.


Source: Smithsonian Magazine | Comments (14)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by Zeta Reticulum 11 years ago
Maybe I should stand on the house and flap my arms. Maybe I could develop wings and fly away. I might get committed too. Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Lava_Lady 11 years ago
Maybe because Darwinism's just a bunch of speculations based on no evidence... Yeah, unlike religion which is backed up by hard evidence... This 4 wing theory does not make a lot of sense. The large feathers on the back legs were probably just that, large feathers. May have aided in gliding.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Andromedan Starseed 333 11 years ago
interesting its more than possible and etc.like how long ago did they lose the other two set of wings?
Comment icon #8 Posted by highdesert50 11 years ago
There is certainly less energy expelled in walking than in flying. So, using that argument, and the notion that these feathered legs would have inhibited movement, why would feathered flying legs ever emerged as an evolved trait?
Comment icon #9 Posted by Abramelin 11 years ago
interesting its more than possible and etc.like how long ago did they lose the other two set of wings? They never did lose the other set of wings: it were -and still are- also legs. .
Comment icon #10 Posted by Abramelin 11 years ago
Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly. The evolution theory is most probably correct, but your understanding of it is obviously not.
Comment icon #11 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri 11 years ago
There is certainly less energy expelled in walking than in flying. So, using that argument, and the notion that these feathered legs would have inhibited movement, why would feathered flying legs ever emerged as an evolved trait? The feathers would have evolved before flight, for instance we now know velociraptor had feathers on parts of it's body, forearms, head and arms I think. Probably for display, but I think also for warmth. On the smaller dinosaurs these feathers were very small and seem to act as down for insulation. I presume that it is no longer disputed that dinosaurs were warm bloo... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by shrooma 11 years ago
Well if evolution is correct, maybe if we all flap our arms each day, in a few million years people will have developed wings and the ability to fly. . I was kinda hoping for jetpacks & hovercars instead..... :-)
Comment icon #13 Posted by Frank Merton 11 years ago
The evolution theory is most probably correct, but your understanding of it is obviously not. That would be inheritence of acquired characteristics. Chop off the puppy's tail and it does not alter the length of its decendents' tails. I would say we should prefer the phrase, "evolutionary theory," representing the body of understanding science has about evolution. The other wording is obsolete and misleading. Now if there were some reason puppies born with short tails survive and reproduce better than those with longer tails, then nature would select in favor of those with shorter tails and ult... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Geldoblam 11 years ago
If they flew with four wings why lose them then?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles