Monday, October 7, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

New 'moon' discovered orbiting the Earth

By T.K. Randall
October 6, 2014 · Comment icon 53 comments

Could there be more than one moon in orbit around us ? Image Credit: CC BY-2.0 Jason Bache
Astronomers have identified an asteroid with an orbit so stable that it is almost like a second moon.
It is common knowledge that the Earth has just one natural satellite, yet our planet's orbit is actually home to several other objects that could technically be considered moons.

The latest candidate, an asteroid discovered in 2014 by Farid Char of the Chilean University of Antofagasta, measures over 100m across and has entered in to a remarkably steady orbit around the Earth where it is likely to stay for at least another century.
"The past and future orbital evolution of this object becomes difficult to predict although it remains in the neighbourhood of Earth's co-orbital region for thousands of years," astronomers wrote.

It is believed that the asteroid has been in its current stable orbit for more than 700 years but that could change within the next two centuries as it is hard to predict what will happen after that.

It is extremely unlikely however that it will ever be formally recognized as a moon.

Source: Huffington Post | Comments (53)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #44 Posted by Junior Chubb 10 years ago
Looks like we need some evidence to sort out this off topic debacle... Edit to remove use of 'winky smiley'. I think I go overboard with them.
Comment icon #45 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 10 years ago
Maybe this could be a candidate for NASA's planned asteroid landing. Thank you, skookum, for posting something which isn't petty nit-picking. I doubt that this would be a good candidate. It's orbit means that it can be as far away from the Earth as 1.5 AU (224,397,000 km, 139434000 miles). This is far further into space than NASA intends to go with the crewed portion of it's Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM). The idea there is that the crew go no further than lunar orbit. The size of 2014 OL339 makes it too large for the uncrewed portion of ARM, which has the aim of placing a small asteroid in l... [More]
Comment icon #46 Posted by Junior Chubb 10 years ago
*snip* Welcome to UM Jyre. Edit: Whops, sorry I thought you were new with 83 posts but you have been here nearly a year already.
Comment icon #47 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 10 years ago
That is, without doubt, misleading and untrue. Ah, I see what you mean, it's the "orbiting the Earth" part that you have problems with. My apologies, I really shouldn't post before I'm properly awake. I agree that is a little misleading and not entirely true. It is true that the object is in orbit around the sun, however it is in an orbit highly influenced by the the Earth to such a degree that it "appears" to orbit the Earth. This is the problem with headlines, they simply can't convey ALL the information. However it also highlights the problem of coming to a conclusion based on a title alone... [More]
Comment icon #48 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 10 years ago
You are more of a troll than a mod, seriously. My posts were overly critical I must admit. My posts were born of a frustration that people were more prepared to criticise a title than discuss the contents of the article. I will take this opportunity to apologise for posting whilst tired and not thinking correctly to any one I have offended. If, however, you believe that because I was critical of people in my posts it makes me a troll I would love to know how your post attacking me means you aren't a troll.
Comment icon #49 Posted by GreenmansGod 10 years ago
Thank you, Waspie Dwarf for clearing that up. I think the Huffington Post article is rather confusing. The New Scientist was much better. I really do appreciate all the great things you post in the science section. It is not like WD gets paid for what he does for us. Why he even bothers to answer some of the nonsense some of you post I have no clue. If you take a little time and read the articles he post and ask intelligent questions you get intelligent answers and y'all might just learn something. If you don't like what I just said, too bad, I could not care less. I am here for the science. J... [More]
Comment icon #50 Posted by Myles 10 years ago
My posts were overly critical I must admit. My posts were born of a frustration that people were more prepared to criticise a title than discuss the contents of the article. I will take this opportunity to apologise for posting whilst tired and not thinking correctly to any one I have offended. If, however, you believe that because I was critical of people in my posts it makes me a troll I would love to know how your post attacking me means you aren't a troll. All is good. I hope you didn't think people were attacking YOU. It was the title on the Unexplained Mysteries site - New 'moon' discove... [More]
Comment icon #51 Posted by DieChecker 10 years ago
Here is a cool related article. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2777750/Meet-Earth-s-new-moon-Peculiar-path-asteroid-2014-OL339-makes-look-like-s-orbiting-planet.html
Comment icon #52 Posted by Harte 10 years ago
My posts were overly critical I must admit. My posts were born of a frustration that people were more prepared to criticise a title than discuss the contents of the article. Save your frustration for when posters start criticizing a different title, such as "Moderator." I will take this opportunity to apologise for posting whilst tired and not thinking correctly to any one I have offended. I remain unoffendable, WD. The thread devolving into punctuation class actually amused me.If, however, you believe that because I was critical of people in my posts it makes me a troll I would love to know h... [More]
Comment icon #53 Posted by Junior Chubb 10 years ago
Is "troll" the lowest form of life, or what? I see people using the term a lot is why I ask. In the sense used a troll is somebody who enters the thread to simply derail it, usually posting the opposite of public opinion to garner a negative response or attention. For some depending on their definition it is close to the lowest form of life online. I didn't see any trolling in this thread, stubbornness maybe (which is a good quality when you are right) but all's well that ends well.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles