Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Palaeontology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Palaeontology

Blood cells discovered in dinosaur fossils

By T.K. Randall
June 11, 2015 · Comment icon 14 comments

Soft tissues have been found preserved in prehistoric fossils. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 David Monniaux
Red blood cells and connective tissues are thought to be preserved within countless fossil specimens.
Scientists at Imperial College in London made the discovery quite by accident when they conducted an analysis of some otherwise unremarkable fossils found 100 years ago in Canada.

Despite being in pieces and of such a low quality that it wasn't even possible to determine which species of dinosaur they belonged to, the fossils were surprisingly found to contain traces of red blood cells and collagen fibers dating back more than 75 million years.

"It's really difficult to get curators to allow you to snap bits off their fossils," said paeolontogist Susannah Maidment who co-authored the study. "The ones we tested are crap, very fragmentary, and they are not the sorts of fossils you'd expect to have soft tissue."
Not only does the discovery provide a way for scientists to learn more about these prehistoric reptiles but it also suggests that large numbers of fossils currently being kept in museums and universities around the world may have also retained soft tissue that nobody had realized was there.

"It may well be that this type of tissue is preserved far more commonly than we thought. It might even be the norm," said Maidment. "This is just the first step in this research."

While it's unlikely that these soft tissues will enable scientists to recover actual DNA from a dinosaur fossil the team has admitted that the possibility can't be completely ruled out.

"It's possible you could find fragments, but to find more than that? Who knows?" said Maidment.

Source: The Guardian | Comments (14)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by Dark_Grey 10 years ago
Its all part of the Hollywood Jurassic World Promo campaign ~ The timing is interesting. Also, this article is 65 million years in the making.
Comment icon #6 Posted by bubblykiss 10 years ago
The timing is interesting. Also, this article is 65 million years in the making. And crafted by Intelligent Design. Sorry, you know that I needed to make that joke.
Comment icon #7 Posted by third_eye 10 years ago
Not only that ... feast your eyes on this latest flavor of 'Science' : NatGeo TRex autopsy link I guess the money is an offer too good to turn down ... hell ... if NatGeo turned it down there will be a line round the building begging for the opportunity ~
Comment icon #8 Posted by BeastieRunner 10 years ago
The article doesn't say "actual" red blood cells, just that they can now see the fossilized ones in the bones due to the level of preservation. Along with other materials that make up the bones or near them (like soft tissue). T-Rex bones were so rare that they were afraid to mess with them until now. The cloning talk needs to die down, not ever going to happen.
Comment icon #9 Posted by paperdyer 10 years ago
Keep telling yourself that cloning of dinos isn't going to happen. Wooly Mammoths are first on the list. (I know, not a dino) All they need to find is a frozen dino bone......and we're off!
Comment icon #10 Posted by ShadowSot 10 years ago
The DNA doesn't last long enough. Best you might get is scraps. Reverse engineering birds is the closest we will get.
Comment icon #11 Posted by BeastieRunner 10 years ago
Keep telling yourself that cloning of dinos isn't going to happen. Wooly Mammoths are first on the list. (I know, not a dino) All they need to find is a frozen dino bone......and we're off! The article also states that DNA is not stable enough to last long enough ... so ...
Comment icon #12 Posted by Dark_Grey 10 years ago
Sorry, you know that I needed to make that joke. Anytime buddy
Comment icon #13 Posted by Atuke 10 years ago
Life finds a way
Comment icon #14 Posted by Calibeliever 10 years ago
I think if 'cloning' a dino were ever possible it would be more along the lines of regressing modern DNA (perhaps birds or reptiles) along their ancestral lines until they reach 65 million years ago and then recreating/re-sequencing the DNA in the lab. Sounds like sci-fi but ... *shrug* ... possible?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles