Monday, June 16, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

NASA set to make another Mars announcement

By T.K. Randall
November 4, 2015 · Comment icon 47 comments

What became of Mars' atmosphere ? Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech
The space agency is set to reveal its latest findings about the Martian atmosphere tomorrow afternoon.
There has been no shortage of announcements about space-based discoveries this year and now NASA scientists who have been working on determining what happened to the atmosphere of Mars have revealed that they will be unveiling their latest discoveries tomorrow at around 2pm EST.

"NASA to announce new findings on fate of Mars' atmosphere. NASA will provide details of key science findings from the agency's ongoing exploration of Mars…" the agency wrote.

As tends to be the case in the run-up to such announcements there has been a growing excitement over exactly what it is that the researchers intend to reveal - most of which centering around the possibility that we might be about to learn more about the potential for life on Mars.
It's more likely however that the reveal will pertain to the history of the planet's atmosphere and the processes that lead to it being slowly eroded away over the last few billion years.

There's also a slim chance that we may hear more about the mysterious presence of methane on Mars - a gas that is typically associated with life - although that's probably a bit of a long shot.

Speculation aside - we'll just have to wait and see what happens tomorrow.

Update: Details of the NASA announcement can be found - here.

Source: Business Insider | Comments (47)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #38 Posted by FTWind 10 years ago
How exactly is the atmosphere getting "ripped away" in your mind? You're putting the effect before the cause. lol im sorry mine is only speculation at this point. Though I think mars is a very old planet and was formed much earlier then earth. Though I wish not to delve to deep might get this thread closed.
Comment icon #39 Posted by socrates.junior 10 years ago
Oops, sorry I asked. (I am intrigued by "very old" and "much earlier", but I'll restrain my curiosity.)
Comment icon #40 Posted by Thorvir Hrothgaard 10 years ago
This: Ok but if every Fair enough, but to say something happened like it's a fact is nonsense in my mind. Like saying a planet lost it's magnetic field due to it's size, when there are so many other objects of smaller size that still have thiers. Followed by this: lol im sorry mine is only speculation at this point. Though I think mars is a very old planet and was formed much earlier then earth. Though I wish not to delve to deep might get this thread closed. So, um, is your own opinion nonsense then?
Comment icon #41 Posted by FTWind 10 years ago
This: Followed by this: So, um, is your own opinion nonsense then? not really my point is not to state it as fact when no one really knows.
Comment icon #42 Posted by docyabut2 10 years ago
A magnetic field requires a molten core. The smaller the planet the faster it's core solidifies. Mars' magnetic field wasn't taken out it decayed naturally. Aren't solar flares responsible for heating the core of planet , causing volcanos to erupt in making the magnetic field act up?
Comment icon #43 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 10 years ago
Aren't solar flares responsible for heating the core of planet , causing volcanos to erupt in making the magnetic field act up? They can affect the magnetic field but they certainly don't heat up the core or trigger volcanoes.
Comment icon #44 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 10 years ago
when there are so many other objects of smaller size that still have thiers. Name a solar system object smaller than Mars that retains a strong internal magnetic field.
Comment icon #45 Posted by FTWind 10 years ago
Name a solar system object smaller than Mars that retains a strong internal magnetic field. My apologies Waspie. We are arguing to different points. This is my fault should of worded my statment better. What I ment was just because something is small does not make it solidify faster , perfect example , Pluto.
Comment icon #46 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 10 years ago
You are making a habit of moving the goal posts when you can't back up your claims. If you can't discuss this in an honest way I see no reason to discuss this with you at all.
Comment icon #47 Posted by FTWind 10 years ago
You are making a habit of moving the goal posts when you can't back up your claims. If you can't discuss this in an honest way I see no reason to discuss this with you at all. I suppose, but my point has never changed. I am addmiting you were right about the magnetic fields and relation to the size of an object, so rejoice you were right on that one.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles