Wednesday, May 27, 2020
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Mars trip radiation exposure levels revealed


Posted on Thursday, 20 September, 2018 | Comment icon 12 comments

Radiation is still a major concern for astronauts. Image Credit: NASA/Pat Rawlings
Scientists have calculated the minimum level of radiation that an astronaut will be exposed to on a trip to Mars.
There is certainly no denying that journeying to other worlds is a seriously risky business.

While the astronauts on the space station are afforded some protection from the Sun's radiation thanks to the Earth's protective magnetic field, the first humans to venture to Mars will have disturbingly few options available when it comes to avoiding a potentially lethal dose.

Some studies have even suggested that journeying to Mars at all may be a death sentence with astronauts receiving several times the survivable dose of radiation over the course of the trip.
Now though, thanks to new data from ESA's ExoMars orbiter, it has been revealed that radiation exposure levels during a round trip to Mars may not be quite as bad as previously thought.

In total, scientists claim, astronauts can expect to receive as little as 60 percent of their maximum recommended career radiation exposure during a trip to Mars that takes 6 months both ways.

While this is still a lot, it is at least survivable, meaning that such a trip may be genuinely achievable.

Source: Engadget | Comments (12)


Tags: Mars, Radiation


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #3 Posted by L.A.T.1961 on 20 September, 2018, 20:15
I don't think shielding is a difficult technical challenge, water can be used but it would add weight to any spacecraft and so it's back to the old problem of launching heavy payloads along with pushing and fuelling a heavy ship. †
Comment icon #4 Posted by Timothy on 20 September, 2018, 21:04
It ainít so bad. There are many people willing to take the risk†for humanity/the sheer experience of it/whatever floats your boat etc. Iíd do it. Would probably have some sperm frozen first though.
Comment icon #5 Posted by seanjo on 20 September, 2018, 22:16
† It's all about weight. Lead stops radiation because it's dense and therefore heavy.†
Comment icon #6 Posted by Seti42 on 20 September, 2018, 22:26
I'm sure at some point in the future, we'll either develop light-weight and effective radiation shielding, or vastly more efficient propulsion systems where all the extra weight won't matter. We just haven't yet.
Comment icon #7 Posted by OverSword on 20 September, 2018, 23:50
60% of alleged survivable dose (I say alleged because it's going to vary from person to person) No thank you.
Comment icon #8 Posted by ExpandMyMind on 21 September, 2018, 1:26
60% of the recommended dosage for an astronaut for his whole career, I believe. So just less total trips in space for whoever goes. Not an especially worrying amount for general health.
Comment icon #9 Posted by OverSword on 21 September, 2018, 3:20
Unless there is a solar flare perhaps?
Comment icon #10 Posted by ExpandMyMind on 21 September, 2018, 8:34
I guess. But then they'd have super powers so I don't think they'd care.
Comment icon #11 Posted by OverSword on 21 September, 2018, 13:35
True. And when they got back they could run for president bringing us to a new low
Comment icon #12 Posted by L.A.T.1961 on 21 September, 2018, 18:28
It looks like they have only calculated dosage rates for the flight, not the stop on Mars. So the total exposure could be 100% + of a total recommended limit. Not sure how that would compare to the risk to life just flying the mission, multiple take off and landings Ect. There are lots of ways to be injured or worse attempting something like this.†


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Virgin Orbit debut rocket launch ends in failure
5-26-2020
Sir Richard Branson's new satellite launching company didn't have much luck with its debut flight yesterday.
Mystery big cats reported across Scotland
5-26-2020
Recent accounts have indicated that the Loch Ness Monster is not the only thing lurking in the Scottish wilds.
Super-rare white grizzly bear spotted in Canada
5-26-2020
A very unusual bear has been captured on film in Banff National Park in Canada's Rocky Mountains.
Blind 'see' letters delivered to their brains
5-25-2020
Scientists have found a way to communicate letters and shapes by 'tracing' them directly into the brain.
Stories & Experiences
Orb of light in room
5-9-2020 | USA/Texas/Waco
 
Not sleeping alone
5-9-2020 | Los Angeles
 
Glowing red eyes
5-9-2020 | Fields, Louisiana
 
Two creature sightings
5-1-2020 | Augusta and Louisana
 
 
My haunted home
5-1-2020 | Rainham, Essex, UK
 
In over my head
3-3-2020 | CA
 
Stranger at night
3-3-2020 | Merritt Island, FL, U.S.
 
The babysitter
2-8-2020 | ON
 
Mystery brain surgery and JFK
2-7-2020 | Toronto Ontario Canada
 

         More stories | Send us your story
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
NASA studies underwater 'white smoker' vents
Posted 4-17-2020 | 0 comments
Hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor can teach us about possible habitats on other worlds.
 
10 strange things about our solar system
Posted 3-17-2020 | 0 comments
A look at some of the most mysterious things about our solar system.
 
Lizzie - Scotland's other loch monster
Posted 3-8-2020 | 0 comments
Amelia Dimoldenberg investigates the Loch Ness Monster's neighbor.
 
Adam Savage and Spot
Posted 2-14-2020 | 4 comments
Adam Savage tests out Boston Dynamics' impressive Spot robot.
 
NASA 2020: Are you ready ?
Posted 1-1-2020 | 3 comments
A look at what's coming up in the world of spaceflight this year.
 
 View: More videos
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 Unexplained-Mysteries.com (c) 2001-2020
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ