Saturday, December 3, 2022
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Extraterrestrial > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Extraterrestrial

Why do we see 'doors', 'pyramids' and 'faces' on Mars?

May 28, 2022 · Comment icon 25 comments



This image shows what was recently described as a 'door' on Mars. Image Credit: NASA / JPL-Caltech
Images of anomalous objects on the Red Planet have been doing the rounds for years, but none of them are quite what they seem.
Enthusiasts lit up social media recently with images of what appeared to be a "doorway" into a hillside on Mars. Was it, some wondered, evidence that the red planet could be, or have been, inhabited by aliens? The "door" was imaged by Nasa's Curiosity rover on May 7 on the slopes of Mount Sharp, the central massif within Gale crater, where it landed in 2012. Described on one website as a "pharaonic tomb door", because of its resemblance to some ancient Egyptian remains, it is in fact only about one foot high.

It is hard to spot on the panoramic image mosaic of the hillside above, but it leaps out at the eye if you see the individual frame where it occurs, seen below. It does look like a doorway until you realise how small it is. And if you boost the contrast in the dark parts of the image, the picture just about reveals a solid rock face at the back of the shadowed interior. So as a gateway into the hollow hills of Mars, it doesn't lead very far.

What the "door" really is

Nobody with even a little geological experience is likely to mistake the feature as a "door". A geologist would note the thin and slightly sloping repeated layers of sandstone making up the whole of the rock face, and would immediately expect that they were looking at the eroded remains of hardened sand dunes. These once covered the stream and lake sediments that Curiosity examined earlier in its gradual climb up through the layers of sedimentary rock making up Mount Sharp.

A geologist would also spot the steep and fairly straight cracks running up the rock face, and recognise these as "joints". These are fractures that typically open up when the weight of overlying rock layers is removed by erosion. There is a particularly obvious joint in the left of the "door" image, but several others can be made out - including one that forms the smooth wall that lines up with the left side of the "door" itself. There's another joint that forms the right side of the feature.

The whole hillside has been eroded back. The "doorway" is simply a place where the wind has been able to scour out the poorly consolidated sand and dust from the rock face a little more effectively, in an area bounded by the joints on either side. The base of an overlying bed of sandstone is the "door lintel", and the sloping top of a bed of sandstone forms the gentle ramp that leads up to the door.

Artefacts on Mars

It doesn't take much searching on the internet to find images taken by Mars rovers that show rock formations that resemble other familiar objects, even though all are implausibly out of place. We should not be surprised that some of the innumerable rocks on Mars have weird shapes, because many have been sandblasted by wind erosion for billions of years.

Apart from "doors" and bits of "hardware" ranging from wrecked "spaceships" and a "jet engine" to individual items of "cutlery", images have also captured "pyramids", numerous "humanoid heads", "dinosaurs", various "bones", and even a "squirrel". Only a few of these strange objects are real, and those are all junk that humans put there. The others lose their visual distinctiveness if seen at closer range or from a different perspective.
Weirdness beyond Mars

"Seeing" the familiar even when it isn't there is a phenomenon called pareidolia. This denotes what happens when you see faces in the random pattern of your wallpaper, or peering out from the grain of wooden flooring, or in the clouds. The latter, for example, is what's causing Jupiter to look angry in the image below.

Seemingly mysterious objects don't occur solely on Mars. In December 2021, China's Chang'e 4 rover - still doing great things on the on the lunar far side more than three years after landing - spotted a "hut shaped" object 80 metres away. It duly trundled towards it, and revealed it to be just a boulder, presumably ejected from a nearby impact crater. Some say it looks like a crouching rabbit, but I doubt anyone is claiming that it was sculpted by aliens.

One of the most famous, and largest, examples of pareidolia is the Horsehead Nebula. This is a vast cosmic cloud of gas and dust, within which whole stellar systems are forming. An image collected in the right part of the spectrum and with an appropriate exposure time shows a shape that most people would recognise as a horse's head. Shift wavelengths (which we can do) or look at it from a different direction (which we can't) and the recognisable shape will vanish.

Back on Earth, climbers high on Great Gable, a mountain in Cumbria, UK, often look out for Cat Rock, otherwise known as Sphinx Rock. Seen from below this looks like a sitting cat, and seen side-on it resembles the profile of the Sphinx's head. So far as I know, everyone accepts this as fluke and no one claims it as evidence that aliens have left landscape clues to their visits to Earth. It beats me why people persist in making such claims for flukey rock formations on Mars.

Ultimately, although you can generally believe your eyes, you should be cautious in believing your brain's interpretation of what your eyes see.

David Rothery, Professor of Planetary Geosciences, The Open University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (25)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #16 Posted by Nobu 5 months ago
I try to keep an open mind about almost everything… but if there was some sort of extinct civilization on mars and it left anything for us to see now after this many millions of years… it would resemble, um a mound. Well it would actually be, at most, a very low elevation mound. With its atmosphere and constant bombing of solar radiation and a dead core (last I checked) I can’t see anything being below ground either. I hate to toss out a definite opinion… but if I had to, I’d label - fantasy.  
Comment icon #17 Posted by the13bats 5 months ago
Lets just speculate for a moment, lets say at one time mars was a thriving world and had a civilization how long would it take to look as it now does?
Comment icon #18 Posted by astrobeing 5 months ago
I don't follow this logic. I picture a civilization as having large tall buildings made of masonry and metal. Solar radiation wouldn't destroy those and a dead core would prevent earthquakes from knocking them over. There is no rain and the thin atmosphere can only blow light dust around. It's seems like Mars would be the best place in the solar system to preserve these kinds of structures and that they would be easy to find.
Comment icon #19 Posted by stereologist 5 months ago
 A while back some clowns got an article into this junk place called JSE. They asked their readers to look at all of the infrastructure in a photo. Had they stated what they actually thougt it would have been a failure. Did they suggest roads, power lines, pipes, etc. No. They wanted fools to fill in whatever they imagined.
Comment icon #20 Posted by badeskov 5 months ago
Haha, no, that would be rude of me. I just thought it looked more like a reptile than Trump. Honest assessment.    Cheers, Badeskov
Comment icon #21 Posted by badeskov 5 months ago
Without being an astrophysicist/astrobiologist, a few billion years for the atmosphere to essentially evaporate into space and dry out the surface of the planet.    Again, I cannot claim any credentials in these fields, so just shooting from the hip.    Cheers, Badeskov
Comment icon #22 Posted by astrobeing 5 months ago
But that won't erase masonry and metal. We were building with stones early in our civilization.
Comment icon #23 Posted by pallidin 5 months ago
Huh. I demand evidence, and I am not a narcissist. But I also greatly admire those whom are bold enough to explore possibilities without prior evidence. Explorers, both scientific and otherwise, have made numerous discoveries without prior evidence. Laboratories, within both government and private facilities (think 3M, for just one example) do this all the time.
Comment icon #24 Posted by astrobeing 5 months ago
Sarcasm.
Comment icon #25 Posted by badeskov 5 months ago
Fair enough. didn't honestly take that into account. Cheers, Badeskov


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

 Total Posts: 7,367,239    Topics: 303,192    Members: 198,975

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles