Wednesday, October 4, 2023
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Conspiracy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Conspiracy

What do astronomers think about Moon landing conspiracy theories ?

July 21, 2023 · Comment icon 9 comments



Did NASA really land astronauts on the Moon in 1969 ? Image Credit: NASA
Astronomer Michael Richmond takes a stab at addressing some common arguments used by conspiracy theorists.
Back in 1969 - more than a half-century ago - Apollo 11 astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the Moon.

At least that's what most people think.

But a few still insist that humans did not land on the Moon.

Should you believe them? How can you know that astronauts really did go to the Moon?

Let's address this question by putting it side by side with another stunning event of the same year: the New York Mets' shocking win in baseball's World Series. They beat the Baltimore Orioles, four games to one.

Another miracle

But how do you know that? How can you be sure? After all, up until 1969, the Mets were a terrible team. They won the fewest games in the major leagues in 1967, and the third-fewest in 1968. It seems very unlikely they could have won the championship the very next year.

What if someone said that it didn't happen? That the Mets instead lost the series to the Orioles? That the claim the Mets won is just a hoax, a canard, a fake story?

Is it possible to prove they're wrong?

Seen on TV

First: Millions of Americans watched the World Series on television - approximately 11 million to 17 million viewers per game, according to Nielsen ratings. Many of those people are still alive today and remember seeing the Mets win.

Why would all of them lie? That doesn't make sense.

Now consider this: More than 600 million people around the world watched the Moon landing on TV.

Seen at stadiums

But a skeptic might say "so what" - maybe the entire World Series was somehow faked, re-created in a TV studio.

Yet ticket records document more than 250,000 people saw the games in person. Along with them were hundreds of TV, radio and newspaper reporters and support personnel who also witnessed the action directly. Many of them are still alive today, and every one of them agrees that the Mets won.

Why would all of them lie? That doesn't make sense.

Now consider this: More than 400,000 people worked on the Apollo program - scientists, engineers, researchers and support staff along with the astronauts.
Even the opposition agreed

So a skeptic might claim the New York media, or some other corporate entity, set up fake broadcasts and fake fans for some nefarious purpose. And the reason no one talks - well, maybe everyone was paid off.

Although the New York newspapers and TV stations may have wanted the Mets to win, the Baltimore reporters and broadcasters, and especially the players and fans, did not.

Yet all of them - even the players - admitted their team had lost. If the Series was a sham, why didn't a single one of them who opposed the Mets expose the fraud?

Why would all of them lie? That doesn't make sense.

Now consider this: The Soviet Union was the United States' rival in the Space Race - it wanted to be the first on the Moon. But the Soviet government told its citizens on radio and television and in newspaper articles in July 1969 that U.S. astronauts had landed on the Moon. Soviet President Nikolai Podgorny even sent a telegram to U.S. President Richard Nixon offering his congratulations.

Score cards and Moon rocks

At this point, a skeptic might change tactics and say all of this evidence is just hearsay, and you can't trust people.

But consider the hard physical objects preserved from the Series. At the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York, you can find score cards and programs from the games, as well as the glove worn by center fielder Tommie Agee. All the objects can be dated to the year 1969.

Certainly, this is slightly weaker evidence; after all, it's possible to produce fake printed items. And even if scientists found traces of Tommie Agee's DNA in the glove, it would prove only that he wore it at some point that year, not necessarily that the Mets had won the Series.

But the physical evidence for the Moon landings cannot be faked so easily. First, the Moon rocks brought back by the Apollo astronauts are unlike rocks on Earth. And they are similar to lunar samples returned by Soviet and Chinese spacecraft. Scientists from many countries have examined these rocks and continue to study them today.

Second, the Apollo 11 astronauts placed mirrors on the Moon that have been detected for decades by telescopes in the U.S., France, Germany, South Africa and Australia. Anyone with a few million dollars can build a telescope big enough to see them.

There's even more evidence we haven't mentioned: the dozens of unmanned probes sent to the Moon by both the U.S. and the USSR before Apollo 11, which built up the technology needed for the landings; the large budget devoted to the project - NASA spent about US$49 billion on lunar missions between 1960 and 1973; and the universal agreement by scientific and academic institutions around the world for the past half-century that astronauts really did land on the Moon.

Now - what do you think? Did the Baltimore Orioles actually win the World Series in 1969? Has a worldwide conspiracy prevented millions of witnesses from coming forward to expose the hoax? Have citizens of the United States suffered from an episode of mass delusion?

Or did the Miracle Mets actually win the World Series in 1969?

The evidence - and your logic and common sense - will answer the question for you.

Michael Richmond, Professor of Astronomy and Physics, Rochester Institute of Technology

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (9)




Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Cho Jinn 2 months ago
My strategy: take a position that can't be readily falsifiable. Manufacture a threshold for truth of the matter, and then rely on others' pathological insecurity that prevents them from leaving me to my garden apartment, stupid devices. Watch the internet message board comment replies roll in, and go back to listening to Lawrence O'Donnell.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Nicolette 2 months ago
It astounds me the level of technology it was done with and how long it has taken people to organize to plan to do it again. Back then they were sure we would have it colonized by now and we are still planning another timid step. What gives?
Comment icon #3 Posted by Roshman 2 months ago
Furthermore congress would have to look into a massive Moon landing fraud. Misappropriation of billions of Dollars. .... Also WHY fake the moon landing?
Comment icon #4 Posted by Obviousman 2 months ago
Money. And political commitment, because the money never comes first. We're seeing that with launch vehicles; now you can make a profit with this stuff and there is a long term business model. One of two things will happen: NASA will set up a colony and when there is money to be made, business will build the rest; or Eventually there will be an argument that there is money to be made in lunar investment, and somebody will start mining something and make a huge profit... eventually
Comment icon #5 Posted by Obviousman 2 months ago
I reject the premise of your question; the lunar landings were real. Prove otherwise. Please remember there are numerous people who will attest to the design, having worked on, having launched the Apollo hardware,having walked on the Moon.If you are going to deny that, then extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. PROVE it didn't happen (and please - no gish galloping; make your claim, be clear & concise)
Comment icon #6 Posted by mehdiocracy 2 months ago
Most people who subscribe to conspiracy theories don't even think of evidence like this. Occam's razor eludes them. I feel like they need to make up these things to dumb life down for themselves. Just because you cant fathom or understand how it happened, doesn't mean its fake.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Noteverythingisaconspiracy 2 months ago
"I don't understand it, so it must be fake" is sadly very common.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Troublehalf 2 months ago
If you speak to really hardcore hoaxers about the moon landing, they usually have a response for all of these, sadly. I will cover them here. Evidence: Lots of people watched it Claim: The numbers were faked OR what they watched was just a film from a studio which was faked. Evidence: Lots of people worked on the Apollo program Claim: They worked on something but not the program. Or they were working on the program but were getting nowhere, so they faked the landing to 'get the win' over USSR Evidence: Soviet Union congratulated USA and agreed they landed on the moon Claim: USSR was struggling... [More]
Comment icon #9 Posted by Scholar4Truth 2 months ago
Anyone remember the video where Buzz Aldrin punched one of those guys?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

 Total Posts: 7,510,874    Topics: 311,126    Members: 200,786

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles