Thursday, February 11, 2016   |   5,957 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Was Bin Laden really buried at sea ?

Posted on Wednesday, 7 March, 2012 | Comment icon 780 comments | News tip by: Still Waters

Image credit: CC 2.0 Sajjad Ali Qureshi

Leaked emails reportedly suggest that Bin Laden was actually taken back to the US for cremation.

The emails were obtained by the infamous hacker group 'Anonymous' from Stratfor, an organisation that deals with geopolitical and intelligence analysis that some call the 'Shadow CIA'. While the emails seem to confirm that Bin Laden was indeed killed during the raid on his compound, they suggest that his body wasn't buried at sea but returned to the US to be cremated at a secret location.

"The claims are sure to stoke conspiracy theorists, especially since the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology that Burton refers to closed its doors on September 15, 2011, four months after bin Laden's death."

  View: Full article |  Source: Daily Mail

  Discuss: View comments (780)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #771 Posted by AngelOfBetrayal on 27 March, 2014, 11:27
Not many, sure, but there's a world of difference between not mentioning it, and deliberate falsehood. What Bush, Cheney, Rice and various others did (and continue to do) since 9/11 is deliberate, contrived falsehood. Deliberate, contrived falsehood about the deaths of thousands of people. Without a single repercussion. To deny that there are people in the US establishment who don't 'want war' is incredibly naïve. I never said the government planned or carried out those attacks. If you pressed me for a theory, I'd lean towards a few, maybe as few as 3 or 4 ... [More]
Comment icon #772 Posted by Babe Ruth on 27 March, 2014, 12:41
Fortunately, I printed out the article by E.P. Heidner. I have no idea why it "can't be found", but I do have my suspicions, as it was rather inflammatory if one believes the official conspiracy theory. Dick Eastman, Tom Flocco, V.K. Durham and Karl Schwarz did a lot of research, and Heidner wrote his synopsis of the financial shenanigans associated with the events of 11 September back in June of 2008. It's funny how things that work against the OCT have a way of "vanishing" from the internet. Thank God for printers, eh?
Comment icon #773 Posted by skyeagle409 on 27 March, 2014, 17:07
Perhaps they came around to the reality there was no government conspiracy.
Comment icon #774 Posted by Babe Ruth on 27 March, 2014, 19:11
No, they are too honest and far too informed to reach that absurd conclusion. To "come around to the reality" that the OCT is true, one must deny virtually all the facts and evidence. They did the reverse--researched and studied on their own.
Comment icon #775 Posted by skyeagle409 on 27 March, 2014, 19:15
They probably decided to close up the shop when they determined that facts, data, and other evidence did not support false claims of the 9/11 Truther Movement. After all, it has been over 12 years since the 9/11 attack and still no evidence of a government conspiracy.
Comment icon #776 Posted by Sweetpumper on 27 March, 2014, 19:29
Why doesn't the al qaeda SCUBA team go after the body?
Comment icon #777 Posted by DecoNoir on 27 March, 2014, 19:39
SCUBA can only get you so far before the pressures would crush your body like a cheap plastic bottle. Also it's a good bet the corpse would be fish **** by now, or more likely a couple of weeks after it was dumped.
Comment icon #778 Posted by Babe Ruth on 28 March, 2014, 12:23
Heck, maybe those radical muslim crewmembers of Flight 370 were trying to crash the airplane at OBL's watery grave, eh? Maybe AQ Navy was out there transmitting the location of that grave?
Comment icon #779 Posted by skyeagle409 on 28 March, 2014, 14:16
I don't find it amusing that you consider the tragedy of Flight 370 something to joke about.
Comment icon #780 Posted by skyeagle409 on 28 March, 2014, 14:20
On the contrary, the evidence supports the official reports, which is how it was determined your nuke story was false.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Other news in this category
How long could a big conspiracy really last ?
Posted 1-27-2016 | 50 comments
A new maths study has suggested that it is very difficult to keep a conspiracy under wraps for long....
Was The X-Files almost shut down by the FBI ?
Posted 1-25-2016 | 23 comments
Series creator Chris Carter claims that he once thought the real FBI was going to shut him down....
McKinnon found evidence of 'space warships'
Posted 12-8-2015 | 94 comments
UFO hacker Gary McKinnon has revealed details of what he allegedly found in NASA's computer systems....
Did the Freemasons rig the Titanic inquiry ?
Posted 11-25-2015 | 24 comments
New evidence suggests that the Freemasons were heavily involved in the investigation in to the disaster....
Is your own mobile phone spying on you ?
Posted 10-8-2015 | 60 comments
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has claimed that governments can take control of anyone's smartphone....
Russian man aims to prove US moon landings
Posted 10-8-2015 | 43 comments
Vitaly Yegorov has managed to raise over 1 million rubles online to fund a new lunar satellite mission....
Russia hints at US moon landing investigation
Posted 6-18-2015 | 230 comments
A Russian government official has proposed an international investigation in to the moon landings....
Researchers expose NSA spying program
Posted 2-17-2015 | 30 comments
A security software firm has revealed that spyware has been hidden within the firmware of hard drives....
Is the CIA developing weather weapons ?
Posted 2-15-2015 | 18 comments
A senior US scientist has expressed concern over the use of climate data by US intelligence agencies....
2014's top conspiracy theories revealed
Posted 12-27-2014 | 28 comments
From Ebola to the Rosetta mission, this year has seen more than its fair share of conspiracy theories....
NASA worker - 'humans visited Mars in 1979'
Posted 11-29-2014 | 86 comments
An ex-NASA employee has insisted that humans walked on the surface of Mars more than 35 years ago....

 View: More news in this category
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ