Tuesday, February 21, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Do DNA tests prove Bigfoot exists ?


Posted on Thursday, 29 November, 2012 | Comment icon 273 comments | News tip by: Socio


Image credit: Vronique Pagnier

 
Veterinarian Melba S. Ketchum believes it does after a 5 year study using over 100 alleged DNA samples

Working as part of Texas-based firm DNA Diagnostics, Ketchum and her team have concluded that Bigfoot not only exists but that it is a human relative that developed 15,000 years ago from cross breeding between humans and another species of primate. The claim is undoubtedly difficult to accept at face value, however the team is comprised of experts in several fields and Ketchum herself has 30 years experience of forensic and genetic research under her belt.

"They're not any of the large apes - they branch off as a separate lineage," she said in an interview. "My personal theory is that it probably branched off and evolved in parallel with the rest of the primate lineage." The claims have been met with a considerable degree of skepticism however, it will likely take several more independent studies to corroborate Ketchum's findings before the scientific community is likely to take them seriously.

"Bigfoot is real. At least that's what veterinarian Melba S."

  View: Full article |  Source: Huffington Post

  Discuss: View comments (273)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #264 Posted by Archimedes on 6 March, 2013, 18:43
Right. 10 years is plenty of time for wildlife photographers to get out there to specifically get an HD pic of a squatch. Have they attempted that yet?Isn't the onus on the bigfoot hunters claiming he exists to go out there and get the photographs? If none (or hardly any) have attempted to get decent quality photos of bigfoot, then what does that tell you about how serious they are about their quest to prove his existence? And 10 years is a serious underestimate for the time hd photography has been around, like I already said, 35mm film in a decent camera more than qualifies as high definition... [More]
Comment icon #265 Posted by Stardrive on 6 March, 2013, 18:46
You sir are correct. HD technology has been around for a while, albiet that type of pre-digital photography was very cumbersome to transport, set-up, and maintain.
Comment icon #266 Posted by Stardrive on 6 March, 2013, 18:55
Isn't the onus on the bigfoot hunters claiming he exists to go out there and get the photographs? I For some I guess. But I can't seem to get him to come out into the open and pose for a nice shot. If I was a bigfoot hunter, a digital SLR with a zoom lens would be part of my standard kit. I have an old dinosaur Sony video cam. It takes nice pics but the resolution is poor. What I have in mind is something about cell-phone sized that can take high quality/resolution sound, video, and pictures. Any suggestions? Something that doesn't look like the standard camera/video cam.
Comment icon #267 Posted by Archimedes on 6 March, 2013, 19:07
Photo's can be hoaxed and manipulated and your reply didn't really answer my question. Photos certainly can be hoaxed. But if you're familiar with photo manipulation you'll know that it is far easier to manipulate and hoax poor quality photos. It's not too hard to hoax a monster or ghost or whatever into an image, and then deliberately degrade the quality of the image by reducing the resolution, adding noise or grain, blurring it a bit, etc.I don't know the origins of the following pic, but it's not hard to imagine how it could have been photoshopped or that it's some dude in an ape costume or... [More]
Comment icon #268 Posted by Archimedes on 6 March, 2013, 19:10
You sir are correct. HD technology has been around for a while, albiet that type of pre-digital photography was very cumbersome to transport, set-up, and maintain. Pre-digital SLRs were no bigger or cumbersome than current models. 35mm SLRs generally use the same body style and size as digital SLRs.
Comment icon #269 Posted by Archimedes on 6 March, 2013, 19:24
For some I guess. But I can't seem to get him to come out into the open and pose for a nice shot.Forest dwelling wildlife in general doesn't come out and pose for photographers but that hasn't prevented innumerable quality pics from both amateurs and pros from being taken of all sorts of weird and wonderful and sometimes extremely rare forest species.I have an old dinosaur Sony video cam. It takes nice pics but the resolution is poor. What I have in mind is something about cell-phone sized that can take high quality/resolution sound, video, and pictures. Any suggestions? Something that doesn't... [More]
Comment icon #270 Posted by DieChecker on 6 March, 2013, 20:02
One problem with bigfoot pics is that usually they are enlargements of an original pic. Usually the "bigfoot" in the pic was a tiny little enlongated dot on the original photo and whoever owned it blew it up to look for bigfoots. And a snag, stump, or even a dark bush look a lot like a bigfoot from a quarter mile away. The problem with game cams is that people set the timer, or it comes pre-timed, and whatever was there triggers it and is gone. But, that is really just an excuse, because pics of deer, and other fast animals are taken all the time. Sakari often posts pics of the deer living by ... [More]
Comment icon #271 Posted by Rafterman on 6 March, 2013, 20:22
Right. 10 years is plenty of time for wildlife photographers to get out there to specifically get an HD pic of a squatch. Have they attempted that yet? What I meant was, you're implying that taking an HD pic of a BF is no different than taking an HD pic of any other rare animal. Really?? you see no difference? So it's the same difficulty factor taking an HD pic of a Kangaroo as it is a Snow Leopard? I'll have to show you, it's badass and alot of fun. I'm not implying that it's no different. I'm stating for a fact that it would be much harder to take a picture of a Red Wolf, for example, than a... [More]
Comment icon #272 Posted by Stardrive on 6 March, 2013, 21:35
And yet, not one, single definitive photograph. Not one. Without a body to back it up there'll never be such a photograph. Not one.
Comment icon #273 Posted by QuiteContrary on 6 March, 2013, 23:25
Without a body to back it up there'll never be such a photograph. Not one. With habituation sites, why speak of only one definitive photograph? There should be dozens of them. Showing bf eating and playing with the toys and whatever else. Videos would also be "de rigueur" by now. And they'd go a long way in proving bigfoot's existence or at least in luring in science. Biology has no blobology or blurrology as it is, so you can't blame them. And for the millionth time "Why? Why? would a bf be afraid of or avoid cameras?" I want just one good reason. I've heard it said bf smell film. Even if the... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
'Tully monster' mystery continues to endure
2-20-2017
A peculiar prehistoric discovery has left scientists scratching their heads for more than five decades.
Ship set to be deliberately trapped in ice
2-20-2017
Scientists are planning to sail a research vessel to the Arctic so it can get stuck in the ice on purpose.
NASA proposes redefining the word 'planet'
2-20-2017
The move, if successful, could mean that our own solar system actually has more than 100 planets in it.
SpaceX Cape Canaveral launch is a success
2-19-2017
The private space firm has successfully launched a Falcon 9 rocket from NASA's Kennedy Space Center.
Other news in this category
'Mermaid bones' on show at Japanese temple
Posted 2-17-2017 | 20 comments
The remains of what some people believe to be a genuine mermaid can be found at Ryuguji temple....
 
Writer investigates Wollaton Park gnomes case
Posted 2-15-2017 | 43 comments
A bizarre encounter by six schoolchildren in 1979 is the subject of a new investigation by Dr Simon Young....
 
State-funded Bigfoot hunts to be outlawed
Posted 2-10-2017 | 48 comments
Lawmakers in New Mexico are aiming to make it illegal for state-funded colleges to hunt for Bigfoot....
 
'Creature' photographed in garden at night
Posted 1-16-2017 | 75 comments
A Reddit user has uploaded an image of what appears to be a strange figure running through a garden....
 
Man tracks 'Bigfoot' for over seven miles
Posted 1-15-2017 | 206 comments
Experienced tracker Christopher Bauer followed a set of large footprints for miles across North Dakota....
 
Did megalodon teeth inspire monster myths ?
Posted 12-15-2016 | 32 comments
The teeth of the largest shark in history may have influenced portrayals of a mythological sea monster....
 
Loch Ness Monster sightings are on the rise
Posted 12-7-2016 | 6 comments
There have been more sightings of the elusive creature this year than during any other this millennium....
 
Two new video clips show alleged thylacines
Posted 12-3-2016 | 55 comments
The Thylacine Awareness Group of Australia has released two new clips recorded using a trail camera....
 
Man keeps vigil for Siberia's Labynkyr Devil
Posted 11-5-2016 | 9 comments
Andrey Solovyev has braved freezing temperatures in his quest to locate Siberia's own Loch Ness Monster....
 
'Ice monster' filmed in Alaska's Chena River
Posted 10-31-2016 | 62 comments
Video footage of a strange snake-like creature covered in ice has recently gone viral on social media....
 
Who or what was the Braidwood 'hairy man' ?
Posted 10-20-2016 | 8 comments
A strange hairy beast made headlines after it was felled by an Australian cordial manufacturer in 1893....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ