Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Archaeologists uncover King David's Palace


Posted on Sunday, 21 July, 2013 | Comment icon 14 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: sxc.hu

 
The remains of two buildings thought to be the site of King David's palace have been found in Jerusalem.

The discovery was made at the site of what archaeologists believe to be the Judean city of Shaarayim where the Biblical clash between David and Goliath was said to have taken place. Some experts are skeptical however, questioning whether this is the actual site or if King David was even a king at all.

"The ruins are the best example to date of the uncovered fortress city of King David," said professors Yossi Garfinkel and Saar Ganor who lead the excavations. "This is indisputable proof of the existence of a central authority in Judah during the time of King David."

"Archaeologists in Jerusalem claim to have uncovered two large buildings fit for a king -- Biblical King David, that is."

  View: Full article |  Source: Fox News

  Discuss: View comments (14)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by kannin on 23 July, 2013, 18:10
indeed please post updates in the future if you can find them stills very very good post!
Comment icon #6 Posted by docyabut2 on 24 July, 2013, 8:30
Sorry, but the palace on the temple mount was discovered quite a while ago... I tend to believe that if you want to find the legendary temples and palaces J'lem is the wrong place to look for them. J'lem was a two cow capital until ~700 BC while Samaria was quite a potentate residence. Digging there will lead to better results. What on earth is a two cow capital?
Comment icon #7 Posted by ShadowSot on 24 July, 2013, 8:32
What on earth is a two cow capital? Means it was a poor, unimportant area.
Comment icon #8 Posted by kmt_sesh on 24 July, 2013, 16:37
In reality, if David was indeed historically linked with Jerusalem, he may have been more of a warlord who was successful in uniting numerous tribes in the highlands of Judah. Jerusalem as a city predates the Hebrews, so David may have taken up residence there after having driven out the resident Canaanites. Questionmark is correct and his statement is corroborated by long decades of archaeological evidence: until the Assyrian conquests of the early eighth century BCE, the true power in what's now Israel was the Northern Kingdom of Samaria. Jerusalem itself, in the south, was likely a backwate... [More]
Comment icon #9 Posted by questionmark on 24 July, 2013, 16:43
As far as that goes, the media likes to paint a pretty picture for the sake of readership: these structures they've been excavating might just as easily have been Canaanite in origin. Well, from what I see the whole thing is not so impressive, a stable and a larger hut. Hardly a palace. The Ponderosa Ranch house was bigger.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Eldorado on 19 August, 2013, 11:14
Well, from what I see the whole thing is not so impressive, a stable and a larger hut. Hardly a palace. The Ponderosa Ranch house was bigger. LOL With a Big Hoss tied-up in the stable.
Comment icon #11 Posted by Taun on 19 August, 2013, 16:14
Well, from what I see the whole thing is not so impressive, a stable and a larger hut. Hardly a palace. The Ponderosa Ranch house was bigger. We tend to think of "palaces" like Versaille or Buckingham or even Cinderella's castle at Disneyland... In reality this was set in the Bronze age (early Bronze age most likely) and an Impressive building back then was more along the lines of one that had solid walls, not just daub and wattle - or mud... Here is a pic of the Royal Palace at Ur from (very roughly) the same period of history (perhaps a bit earlier in time but not technology): As you can see... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by questionmark on 19 August, 2013, 16:21
We tend to think of "palaces" like Versaille or Buckingham or even Cinderella's castle at Disneyland... In reality this was set in the Bronze age (early Bronze age most likely) and an Impressive building back then was more along the lines of one that had solid walls, not just daub and wattle - or mud... Here is a pic of the Royal Palace at Ur from (very roughly) the same period of history (perhaps a bit earlier in time but not technology): As you can see it's just a blocky, mud-brick building that was probably roofed over with palm fronds and danged dim inside... Not too impressive by modern s... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by Taun on 19 August, 2013, 16:35
Take 1/8 of that and you will have the J'lem "palace", including stable of course. Most of those rooms were for scribes and storage... The Sumerians were fanatics about having lots of scribes...
Comment icon #14 Posted by brlesq1 on 20 August, 2013, 8:21
This is pretty cool. Bears watching.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5854412
264515
165081

 
'Creature' photographed in garden at night
1-16-2017
A Reddit user has uploaded an image of what appears to be a strange figure running through a garden.
Rain brings alien-like shrimp back to life
1-16-2017
A prehistoric species of shrimp in Australia has been emerging from the ground recently due to heavy rain.
Exorcist was killed by 'malevolent force'
1-15-2017
Father Malachi Martin, who inspired the movie 'The Exorcist', was allegedly killed by an unseen force.
Man tracks 'Bigfoot' for over seven miles
1-15-2017
Experienced tracker Christopher Bauer followed a set of large footprints for miles across North Dakota.
Other news in this category
Hidden wall discovered near Egyptian city
Posted 12-26-2016 | 3 comments
Archaeologists have unveiled a hidden wall that may indicate the presence of nearby pharaonic tombs....
 
Evidence of prehistoric plant cooking found
Posted 12-20-2016 | 3 comments
Researchers at the University of Bristol have found cooking pot fragments dating back over 10,000 years....
 
Mystery surrounds Amazon's 'Stonehenge'
Posted 12-16-2016 | 14 comments
An ancient civilization is believed to have built standing stones in the rainforest over 1,000 years ago....
 
Face of Robert the Bruce has been revealed
Posted 12-10-2016 | 29 comments
Scientists have put together a reconstruction of what the famous Scottish king would have looked like....
 
7,000-year-old lost city unearthed in Egypt
Posted 11-26-2016 | 8 comments
Archaeologists have discovered the remains of an ancient city and graveyard at Abydos in southern Egypt....
 
Ancient Egyptian mummy unearthed near Luxor
Posted 11-14-2016 | 13 comments
Discovered in a tomb by Spanish archaeologists, the well-preserved mummy dates back over 3,000 years....
 
Did the ancient Scots eat roasted rodents ?
Posted 10-22-2016 | 24 comments
Forget haggis - Neolithic Scots living on the islands may have once had an appetite for the humble vole....
 
Two 'secret rooms' found within Great Pyramid
Posted 10-18-2016 | 602 comments
Two previously-unknown cavities have been identified within the walls of Egypt's Great Pyramid of Giza....
 
25 unpublished Dead Sea Scrolls unveiled
Posted 10-10-2016 | 22 comments
A selection of never-before-seen Dead Sea Scroll fragments have been published in two new books....
 
Ancient burnt scroll is 'virtually unwrapped'
Posted 9-22-2016 | 8 comments
Scientists have used cutting-edge techniques to read a charred scroll dating back over 1,500 years....
 
Skeleton found at the Antikythera shipwreck
Posted 9-20-2016 | 2 comments
Divers have unearthed 2,000-year-old skeletal remains within the wreckage of a Roman-era cargo ship....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ