Tuesday, February 7, 2023
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
Space & Astronomy

Have Mars rovers destroyed signs of life ?

By T.K. Randall
May 25, 2009 · Comment icon 4 comments



Image Credit: NASA
The Mars rovers may have been inadvertantly destroying signs of life in the methods employed to detect them it has been claimed. A new improved instrument for detecting life that should resolve the issue will be used in the 2016 ExoMars rover.
Have Mars landers been destroying signs of life? Instead of identifying chemicals that could point to life, NASA's robot explorers may have been toasting them by mistake."


Source: New Scientist | Comments (4)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by :PsYKoTiC:BeHAvIoR: 14 years ago
Although I'm sure it's plausible to say the rovers may be inadvertantly removing any possible signs of life, I think the article is being a bit dramatic. The rovers only explored what would be the "tip of the iceberg" on Mars. There's a planet's worth of land yet to be explored that hasn't been touched by any human contraptions. Just keep the rovers where they have been already and everything will be fine.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Lady Amethyst 14 years ago
What would be the point in that?
Comment icon #3 Posted by OilFight 14 years ago
Image credit: NASA The Mars rovers may have been inadvertantly destroying signs of life in the methods employed to detect them it has been claimed. A new improved instrument for detecting life that should resolve the issue will be used in the 2016 ExoMars rover. "Have Mars landers been destroying signs of life? Instead of identifying chemicals that could point to life, NASA's robot explorers may have been toasting them by mistake." View: Full Article | Source: New Scientist lol, oops!
Comment icon #4 Posted by MindFire 14 years ago
So are the perchlorate's somehow used in the identification process or are they there for some other reason? The article never says why perchlorate's should be suspected to be present in the rover or samples. Are they common? Ideas?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

 Total Posts: 7,399,338    Topics: 304,496    Members: 199,471

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles