Did Buzz Aldrin see a UFO near the moon ?

There's every chance aliens exist, and there's every chance they are here now, and there's every chance they have built every anomalous structure detected in the solar system. Things that look like buildings on mars, might well be buildings. No other deceptive or long winded pompous-assed pseudo-scientific explanation needed, thanks. Why doesn't a proper space agency like the ESA grow some cojones and say publically... "Dr. Neukum has found something that looks like a giant statue of the head of an elf-like alien in his image Coloredmap.jpg, but please make up your own minds".

... Why doesn't a proper space agency like the ESA grow some cojones and say publically... "Dr. Neukum has found something that looks like a giant statue of the head of an elf-like alien in his image Coloredmap.jpg, but please make up your own minds". Why should they?. Cheers, Badeskov

Why should they?. Cheers, Badeskov Well true, some people might say that academic's are spineless people that are easily manipulated by government. Perhaps they enjoy the eunuch life. Growing cojones may not have any benefit as the closest they get to needing courage is playing WoW every night in cyberspace...some might say Bottoms up Rach

Well true, some people might say that academic's are spineless people that are easily manipulated by government. Perhaps they enjoy the eunuch life. Growing cojones may not have any benefit as the closest they get to needing courage is playing WoW every night in cyberspace...some might say It has nothing to do with being spineless, actually, rather the opposite. Most prominent scientists have brass cojones and will certainly not let any Government dictate anything that would question the integrity of their research. Additionally, it is most certainly not the job of scientists to run around gue... [More]

It has nothing to do with being spineless, actually, rather the opposite. Most prominent scientists have brass cojones and will certainly not let any Government dictate anything that would question the integrity of their research. Additionally, it is most certainly not the job of scientists to run around guessing without data to back them up, nor is it their job to ask others to run around guessing. People will do that anyways (examples are more than plentyful, sadly). It is the job of scientist to convey the data they know, not engage in wild speculation. And, frankly, we know what happens wh... [More]

It will be dark and runny, but it wont be ale. Cheers Rach So I take it you disagree with my assessment of what scientists should and should not do. Is that correct? If so, maybe you could elaborate a bit on that? Cheers, Badeskov

There's every chance aliens exist, and there's every chance they are here now, and there's every chance they have built every anomalous structure detected in the solar system. ...I am supposing that some words simply fall on deaf ears here... Things that look like buildings on mars, might well be buildings. No other deceptive or long winded pompous-assed pseudo-scientific explanation needed, thanks. And the deception involved in a proper scientific explanation, clearly outlining the most likely scenario lies where? I can answer that... The "deception" lies in the mind of the one who can't unde... [More]

Well true, some people might say that academic's are spineless people that are easily manipulated by government. Perhaps they enjoy the eunuch life. Growing cojones may not have any benefit as the closest they get to needing courage is playing WoW every night in cyberspace...some might say Bottoms up Rach Some might say...sure. In fact, many these days do. But they simply don't understand that the vast majority of scientists are neither employed by the government, nor are they controlled by government in the slightest. Actual scientific discovery is distributed rapidly, and without the governm... [More]

Things that look like buildings on mars, might well be buildings. No other deceptive or long winded pompous-assed pseudo-scientific explanation needed, thanks. So we must all fall into step with Hoagland style nonsense about artificiality, because actual evidence indicating lack of artificiality will be ignored? ...and just who are the "sheeple"??

So we must all fall into step with Hoagland style nonsense about artificiality, because actual evidence indicating lack of artificiality will be ignored? ...and just who are the "sheeple"?? Nibs