Lizards' camouflage reveals evolution

Prepare for the hordes of Young Earth Creationists 'debunking' this...

Prepare for the hordes of Young Earth Creationists 'debunking' this... Oh don't you worry. A change in color or size has no connection to the kind of evolution that Darwinists want people to believe. There is no mutational advance whereby new structures are forming changing the one organism to another. There is no evidence for the common ancestry of all living things. Evolutionist tend to utilize the "bait-switch fallacy" when trying to promote one type of evolution publicly by creating press releases about micro-evolution whereby color and size changes are observed; all the while, wanting the... [More]

And yet again I would like to point out that Evolution is Biology... which has no correlation to the debate over how things "began" Though to add something on topic. You can bet if the color change makes it more likely for these lizards to live longer lives. That will also result in them being more likely to produce offspring. And thus more likely to pass their genes on to future members of their kind. Resulting in a higher percentage of lizards having this color change. Rinse, repeat........ evolution. Despite the fact that people like to tell you it's more complex than that. It's very simple... [More]

Oh don't you worry. A change in color or size has no connection to the kind of evolution that Darwinists want people to believe. There is no mutational advance whereby new structures are forming changing the one organism to another. There is no evidence for the common ancestry of all living things. Evolutionist tend to utilize the "bait-switch fallacy" when trying to promote one type of evolution publicly by creating press releases about micro-evolution whereby color and size changes are observed; all the while, wanting the public to accept common ancestry even though the kind of organism has ... [More]

And yet again I would like to point out that Evolution is Biology... which has no correlation to the debate over how things "began" Though to add something on topic. You can bet if the color change makes it more likely for these lizards to live longer lives. That will also result in them being more likely to produce offspring. And thus more likely to pass their genes on to future members of their kind. Resulting in a higher percentage of lizards having this color change. Rinse, repeat........ evolution. Despite the fact that people like to tell you it's more complex than that. It's very simple... [More]

Oh don't you worry. A change in color or size has no connection to the kind of evolution that Darwinists want people to believe. There is no mutational advance whereby new structures are forming changing the one organism to another. There is no evidence for the common ancestry of all living things. Evolutionist tend to utilize the "bait-switch fallacy" when trying to promote one type of evolution publicly by creating press releases about micro-evolution whereby color and size changes are observed; all the while, wanting the public to accept common ancestry even though the kind of organism has ... [More]

didn't they do this with moths in england only years later find that they were wrong.

didn't they do this with moths in england only years later find that they were wrong. Nope, that is a creationist lie.

There is no evidence for the common ancestry of all living things. Despite the fact that you are wrong, it is nice to see a creationist who knows about common ancestry rather than spouting all that rubbish about crocaduck and badgers giving birth to gerbils.

Despite the fact that you are wrong, it is nice to see a creationist who knows about common ancestry rather than spouting all that rubbish about crocaduck and badgers giving birth to gerbils. Wait Crocaducks give birth to gerbils? I always thought it was the Fronky kind that gave birth to gerbils