Thursday, May 1, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Mind-controlled weapons of the future

By T.K. Randall
February 10, 2012 · Comment icon 21 comments

Image Credit: sxc.hu
Scientists are considering the concept of mind-controlled weapon system and drone interfaces.
A study conducted for Britain's national academy of science took a look at many ways in which modern advances in technology could benefit military hardware and tactics, one of which being a system to connect a soldier's mind directly to the targetting systems of an armed drone. "Since the human brain can process images, such as targets, much faster than the subject is consciously aware of, a neurally interfaced weapons system could provide significant advantages over other system control methods in terms of speed and accuracy," the report states.
Researchers found the Armed Forces could harness the rapid advance of neuroscience to improve the training of soldiers, pilots and other personnel. A study, from the Royal Society, Britain’s national academy of science, showed the possible benefits of neuroscience to military and law enforcement.


Source: Telegraph | Comments (21)

Tags:


Other news and articles

Recent stories:

Isle of Lewis Scottish islanders are being driven mad by pervasive 'Hebridean Hum'
4-30-2025
Jacques Vallee Aliens are killing people, claims real-life 'Close Encounters' scientist
4-30-2025
Vatican secret archives. Next pope to be urged to release UFO files from Vatican's archives
4-29-2025
Rover from Space First-of-its-kind NASA image shows rover on Mars taken from space
4-29-2025
Phrenologist The strange world of phrenology, or 'reading the bumps on your head'
4-28-2025
80-year-old falls from 6th floor window... then walks away unscathed
4-28-2025
<< Previous story
How did zebras get their stripes ?
Next story >>
Cardinal predicts Pope's death within a year
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #12 Posted by Spock_the_Future 13 years ago
Finding new and better ways to kill doesn't seem appealing to me. Why not make a mind controlled space exploration ship instead ? or try to find if warp technology is possible ?
Comment icon #13 Posted by aquatus1 13 years ago
Finding new and better ways to kill doesn't seem appealing to me. Really? The old ways of killing tend towards more and more indiscriminate and painful the farther back you go. New technology allows more and more accuracy, lower collateral damage, and faster termination than ever before. Heck, we've even outlawed certain weapons which we consider to be too cruel and barbaric, even if they were a bit more effective than the one's we use now. Finding new and better ways to kill people seems to me to be a fine indicator that we are moving away from our brutal and barbaric path to a more peaceful ... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Spock_the_Future 13 years ago
Really? The old ways of killing tend towards more and more indiscriminate and painful the farther back you go. New technology allows more and more accuracy, lower collateral damage, and faster termination than ever before. Heck, we've even outlawed certain weapons which we consider to be too cruel and barbaric, even if they were a bit more effective than the one's we use now. Finding new and better ways to kill people seems to me to be a fine indicator that we are moving away from our brutal and barbaric path to a more peaceful future. Come On. Is Killing really that necessary ? Killing in bet... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by aquatus1 13 years ago
Come On. Is Killing really that necessary ? Not anymore. That's why we can spend ten years trying to negotiate peace before having to actually shoot anyone. Killing in better way is humane ? Well, yeah, pretty much by definition. why not endorse mercy killing then ? Because mercy killings, not being war, are an entirely different ballgame. It's a different ballgame entirely and seems more humane then trying to find better ways for killing people who still wish to live. You are certainly entitled to hold your opinions on subject other than the one actually being discussed in this thread. Why no... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by Spock_the_Future 13 years ago
Not anymore. That's why we can spend ten years trying to negotiate peace before having to actually shoot anyone. And the good thing about it is ? Well, yeah, pretty much by definition. So killing is necessary (Evil, I hope that you think that it is wrong in someway) by what you are saying ? Because mercy killings, not being war, are an entirely different ballgame. Yep they are, but in the end, some human life is lost in the end, which we maybe able to avoid with mind controlled limbs and so on and so forth. You are certainly entitled to hold your opinions on subject other than the one actually... [More]
Comment icon #17 Posted by aquatus1 13 years ago
And the good thing about it is ? *blinks* Seriously? The good thing about being able to talk about a problem for ten years, as opposed to just killing people deemed a threat? I guess I always just took it as a given that it was inherently a good thing, but if I had to think about it, I supposed I would say that the good thing about killing no longer being really necessary would be that it is a gradual process of removing ourselves from our more brutal past. So killing is necessary (Evil, I hope that you think that it is wrong in someway) by what you are saying ? Ah, no? That killing in a faste... [More]
Comment icon #18 Posted by Spock_the_Future 13 years ago
*blinks* Seriously? The good thing about being able to talk about a problem for ten years, as opposed to just killing people deemed a threat? I guess I always just took it as a given that it was inherently a good thing, but if I had to think about it, I supposed I would say that the good thing about killing no longer being really necessary would be that it is a gradual process of removing ourselves from our more brutal past. Ah, no? That killing in a faster, less painful, and more precise way is more humane does not really lead to the conclusion that killing is necessary. Using a piston gun to... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by aquatus1 13 years ago
Well I must say that your sense of fatality and the finality when you say that we will always indulge in some kind of killings and war kind of saddens me. Accepting that it is a reality today does not mean that one believes that it can never change, so it is hardly fatalistic. Nor is finality a bad thing when it concerns the frank reality in front of us today. Why would you call the concept of not thinking of killing fellow beings "Philosophy" ? When a subjective concept influences morality and ethics in your worldview and causes you to behave in certain cultural manners, it is referred to as ... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by Spock_the_Future 13 years ago
Accepting that it is a reality today does not mean that one believes that it can never change, so it is hardly fatalistic. Nor is finality a bad thing when it concerns the frank reality in front of us today. Reality today is not a change. We do tend to change, we can change, and I hope that we will change. When a subjective concept influences morality and ethics in your worldview and causes you to behave in certain cultural manners, it is referred to as a philosophy. Morality defines us humans. I've seen a video of US skinning animals alive for selling FUR(And It's just the starting point). If... [More]
Comment icon #21 Posted by aquatus1 13 years ago
Reality today is not a change. We do tend to change, we can change, and I hope that we will change. As do I. Which is why one can have hope for the future, but still act on the reality of today. Morality defines us humans. I've seen a video of US skinning animals alive for selling FUR(And It's just the starting point). If it's still philosophy for you than then we will not discuss this. Also I agree it's not relevant to the topic. Humans define morality, not the other way around. There is no absolute morality that dictates who is human and who is not. For example, I cannot consider skinning an... [More]
 Click here to view all 21 comments on this story    


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles
Isle of Lewis
Modern Mysteries

Scottish islanders are being driven mad by pervasive 'Hebridean Hum'

4-30-2025 | 4
Jacques Vallee
The UFO Phenomenon

Aliens are killing people, claims real-life 'Close Encounters' scientist

4-30-2025 | 7
Vatican secret archives.
The UFO Phenomenon

Next pope to be urged to release UFO files from Vatican's archives

4-29-2025 | 12
Rover from Space
Space & Astronomy

First-of-its-kind NASA image shows rover on Mars taken from space

4-29-2025 | 1
Phrenologist
Metaphysics & Psychology

The strange world of phrenology, or 'reading the bumps on your head'

4-28-2025 | 12
World of the Bizarre

80-year-old falls from 6th floor window... then walks away unscathed

4-28-2025 | 20
View More News