Thursday, April 25, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Nuclear fusion propulsion proposed

By T.K. Randall
June 28, 2012 · Comment icon 19 comments

Image Credit: NASA/ESA
Physicists are developing a pulsed nuclear fusion system to propel spacecraft in to deep space.
Conventional spacecraft propulsion systems are too slow to enable practical manned space travel beyond the moon, a mission to Mars alone could take up to eight months. With nuclear fusion however this travel time could be reduced to just eight weeks or less, harnessing the same processes that take place within the heart of the sun.
A physics team from The University of Alabama in Huntsville's Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering soon will take delivery of a specialized system to see if they can "Z-pinch" a tiny bit of that salt into the heart of a star.


Source: Phys.org | Comments (19)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by Junior Chubb 12 years ago
While the combustion engine is being mentioned, anyone any idea how much horse-power Pulsed Nuclear Fusion Propulsion would produce?
Comment icon #11 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 12 years ago
While the combustion engine is being mentioned, anyone any idea how much horse-power Pulsed Nuclear Fusion Propulsion would produce? Not much in comparison to a chemical rocket, but power isn't really the point. It's the fact that the engine continues to accelerate the vehicle for weeks on end that makes it so effective.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Junior Chubb 12 years ago
Not much in comparison to a chemical rocket, but power isn't really the point. It's the fact that the engine continues to accelerate the vehicle for weeks on end that makes it so effective. Thanks for the clarification Waspie What I was really hoping for was 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 hp
Comment icon #13 Posted by paul the walrus 12 years ago
Sounds risky to me. Do we really want this type of material raining down on us, if or when, an accident occurs during lift off?
Comment icon #14 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 12 years ago
Sounds risky to me. Do we really want this type of material raining down on us, if or when, an accident occurs during lift off? This is fusion, not fission. Hydrogen is fused together to form helium. There are no radioactive fuels and no radioactive byproducts.
Comment icon #15 Posted by csspwns 12 years ago
tats cool but we stll gotta find a way to make spacecrafts move the speed of light
Comment icon #16 Posted by WillSoMysterious 12 years ago
Thanks for the clarification Waspie What I was really hoping for was 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 hp Or 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 HamsterPower! Or 230,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 GoldfishPower! If anyone would like to try and correct me on my calculations for making animals equivilents to horsepower, please feel free to do some tests and prove me wrong.
Comment icon #17 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 12 years ago
If anyone would like to try and correct me on my calculations for making animals equivilents to horsepower, please feel free to do some tests and prove me wrong. The beauty of science is that we don't need to. A hypothesis is considered false unless proven to be true. The burden of proof lies totally with you. As you have presented no evidence you are automatically assumed to be wrong.
Comment icon #18 Posted by Junior Chubb 12 years ago
Or 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 HamsterPower! Or 230,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 GoldfishPower! If anyone would like to try and correct me on my calculations for making animals equivilents to horsepower, please feel free to do some tests and prove me wrong. The beauty of science is that we don't need to. A hypothesis is considered false unless proven to be true. The burden of proof lies totally with you. As you have presented no evidence you are automatically assumed to be wrong. I did see him heading home from an aquarium with 230,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by lightly 12 years ago
Great. I hope it works as they hope. This type of propulsion couldn't lift off from the ground though? Could only be engaged once out of earth's grip?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles