Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Extraterrestrial > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Extraterrestrial

Roswell officer speaks from the grave

By T.K. Randall
December 8, 2012 · Comment icon 92 comments

Image Credit: Newspaper
A tape has been unveiled that was recorded by a now deceased officer involved in the Roswell incident.
Lieutenant Colonel Walter Haut made headlines when he signed a notarized declaration in 2002 to confirm his full knowledge of the events that took place at Roswell, New Mexico in 1947. Four years earlier however he had recorded an audio tape detailing various aspects of the incident including the crashing of an extraterrestrial craft and the recovery of the occupant's body. The tape was kept under wraps at the time because Haut did not want it to be released until after his death.

The recording is an interview between Haut and Wendy Connors, a pioneering researcher from New Mexico. "To the best of my remembrance there was one body," Haut had stated during the interview. "It was a relatively small body, comparable to, oh, maybe to an 11 year old or a 10 year old child." He also described having witnessed the wreckage from the crash stored at a hangar at his base.[!gad]Lieutenant Colonel Walter Haut made headlines when he signed a notarized declaration in 2002 to confirm his full knowledge of the events that took place at Roswell, New Mexico in 1947. Four years earlier however he had recorded an audio tape detailing various aspects of the incident including the crashing of an extraterrestrial craft and the recovery of the occupant's body. The tape was kept under wraps at the time because Haut did not want it to be released until after his death.

The recording is an interview between Haut and Wendy Connors, a pioneering researcher from New Mexico. "To the best of my remembrance there was one body," Haut had stated during the interview. "It was a relatively small body, comparable to, oh, maybe to an 11 year old or a 10 year old child." He also described having witnessed the wreckage from the crash stored at a hangar at his base.
A Lieutenant Colonel and Press Officer at Roswell Army Air Field (RAAF) in 1947 left a testament to the reality of fallen ET in a rare audio recording that was meant to be heard after his death. A portion of it is revealed here publicly for the first time.


Source: The Bragalia Files | Comments (92)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #83 Posted by praetorian-legio XIII 13 years ago
My take on Roswell has always been that the US military got caught with their pants down. At that time (40's) they did not have an effective, experienced response team or plan. Hence so much information got out about it before they could control the site and create a cover story. Today, a "UFO" goes down and they are all over it. Total information blackout.
Comment icon #84 Posted by Sweetpumper 13 years ago
My take on Roswell has always been that the US military got caught with their pants down. At that time (40's) they did not have an effective, experienced response team or plan. Hence so much information got out about it before they could control the site and create a cover story. Today, a "UFO" goes down and they are all over it. Total information blackout. And it's a good take.
Comment icon #85 Posted by psyche101 13 years ago
Morning mate, What I am driving at here is that it is not 75% of people convicted by eyewitness testimony but 75% of those found to be wrongly convicted.....Yes I am using a total count but only when directly related...let me try another way... Gidday Quillius Sorry, but I think we are still saying the same thing in some respect, my initial post said: Eyewitness testimony is directly responsible for 75% of Wrongful convictions overturned by DNA. Isn't the bolded the same as your qualifier? of all wrongful convictions, that have been proven incorrect by way of DNA evidence, 75% of those example... [More]
Comment icon #86 Posted by psyche101 13 years ago
Psyche,mate I think we have to agree to disagree here. You are truly a scholar on the UFO subject and I hasten to add a gentleman. Your one of the reasons I generally don't scuff and deride debunkers and skeptics. You provided a compelling case and addressed every point perfectly. However there's still a teeny-weeny glimmer of doubt in my eyes about the official story. Despite all this I've still got a limit of belief when it comes to certain incidents. I would be a cad to refuse such a polite and well written response. Sir, you humble me. With regards to your personal pursuit, please do carry... [More]
Comment icon #87 Posted by psyche101 13 years ago
Personally I would need to see something more along the Walter Haut claims to make it valid for me. I tried listening to the MP3 but the volume was so low I couldn't make out anything. Then there is this site http://roswellproof....t.html#anchor_8 Towards the bottom of the page you will see his 2002 affidavit followed by his 1993 affidavit. The differences in the affidavits are a problem for me. Then there are sections like this one from the 2002 affidavit: [/left] The bold part is of concern. Having been in the military, if something comes up that needs to be dealt with, your superiors do not... [More]
Comment icon #88 Posted by psyche101 13 years ago
Its not what you did say , it's what you don’t .... Quillius summed up what I was trying to explain ......... Without the appropriate numbers , I.E - total cases convicted by eye-witness testimony proven to be correct versus the total cases over turned by DNA after the fact , I don't think it is correct to use those figures to justify your position on eye-witness testimony . I do agree that one is too many , especially if that one is you or I with our neck on the line so to speak but as a whole I would be confident in saying that eye-witness testimony has been right many more times than it h... [More]
Comment icon #89 Posted by psyche101 13 years ago
For clarification: 10000 convicted Why does the 10,000 matter? Only the very next step is the figure being sought. Those who are directly affected by eyewitness testimony. 5000 of these are through eyewitness testimony alone OK, so we have out sample of those convicted by eyewitness testimony. 5,000 people. out of the 10000 convicted 10 are found to be innocent through modern techniques. ​Why are we back to the ten thousand? if the 5,000 directly pertains to eyewitness testimony? We are only considering those that have been reinvestigated are we not? And we have not got to that number yet. W... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by quillius 13 years ago
For clarification: 10000 convicted Why does the 10,000 matter? Only the very next step is the figure being sought. Those who are directly affected by eyewitness testimony. Gidday Psyche, This is in response to both of your posts for me...its that time thing again...gets worse this time of year... anyhow the 10000 figure is crucial in determining what that 75% figure really represents 5000 of these are through eyewitness testimony alone OK, so we have out sample of those convicted by eyewitness testimony. 5,000 people. out of the 10000 convicted 10 are found to be innocent through modern techni... [More]
Comment icon #91 Posted by psyche101 13 years ago
Gidday Psyche, This is in response to both of your posts for me...its that time thing again...gets worse this time of year... anyhow the 10000 figure is crucial in determining what that 75% figure really represents we have to always go back to the 10k figure because we are using the number 10, this number is not resctricted to eyewitness testimony alone ...just 75% of it is. Gidday Mate I hear you, quiet day for me too. No time to feed to trolls today. They will have to go hungry for a day.' What I find hard to understand is that the sample of 300 cases was restricted to testimony alone. If we... [More]
Comment icon #92 Posted by Mag357 13 years ago
They want you to think that all these hundreds of Roswell witnesses are lying. Don't believe them. These UFOs crashes are real and they have happened more than once. Maybe the debunkers are getting paid not by the dollar, pound or euro... but by the shilling.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles