Friday, April 26, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

UK MPs vote to allow three-parent babies

By T.K. Randall
February 3, 2015 · Comment icon 49 comments

A baby can now technically have both a father and two mothers. Image Credit: sxc.hu
In a historic vote today British MPs voted in favor of allowing mitochondrial DNA replacement.
Britain is now set to become the first country in the world where it is legal for a baby to have three biological parents.

The controversial new law change will make it possible for doctors to perform an IVF technique that involves replacing defective mitochondrial DNA in one egg with healthy DNA from another.

The method was approved in order to help ensure that children aren't born with debilitating genetic conditions.

"All reasonable and rigorous steps have been followed to reach this point," said health minister Jane Ellison. "This is a bold step for parliament to take but it is considered an informed step. For many families affected it is light at the end of a very dark tunnel."
Reactions to the decision however have been mixed with criticis arguing that the process is unethical and could lead to the creation of three-parent "designer babies" in the future.

"You are not curing somebody of something you are creating someone different," said Jacob Rees-Mogg MP. "People have compared it to blood transfusions. That is simply wrong."

Human bioethics councilor Dr Calum MacKellar warned of where such practices may ultimately lead.

"The legalisation of such procedures opens the door to a dangerous brave new future for humanity where further genetic alterations of human beings become inevitable," he said.

Source: Telegraph | Comments (49)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #40 Posted by Leonardo 9 years ago
Doesn't really matter, once you open the door to genetic manipulation to prevent some disease, then people will look at perhaps autism, and then...... lefthandedness. Changing a marker that is connected to homosexuality, or lefthandedness, or whatever will be called a medical treatment also. Autism is a disability, left-handedness or homosexuality - not so much. Neither is having brown eyes as opposed to blue; having an IQ of 120 as opposed to 180; not being able to run a marathon in 2 hrs 10 mins; etc. In general someone with good mDNA will have better health and live longer then those with i... [More]
Comment icon #41 Posted by Calle 9 years ago
If things continue this way we will have mutated generations in few decades. like this current generation is any better.
Comment icon #42 Posted by DieChecker 9 years ago
Autism is a disability, left-handedness or homosexuality - not so much. Neither is having brown eyes as opposed to blue; having an IQ of 120 as opposed to 180; not being able to run a marathon in 2 hrs 10 mins; etc. Those are still subjective. YOU think autism is a disability, and other things not so much. But that is you, not everyone. Once all other disabilities are gone, those non-disability traits may become disabilities. Apart from the distinction between mitochondria that function as expected and mitochondria that don't, there is no 'selection process' in choosing what donor cells to rep... [More]
Comment icon #43 Posted by LV-426 9 years ago
Those are still subjective. YOU think autism is a disability, and other things not so much. But that is you, not everyone. Once all other disabilities are gone, those non-disability traits may become disabilities. There's no sense to following this kind of logic. Ultimately, everything from 'fire' to 'the internet' has the potential for misuse. You can't ignore the potential benefits of a concept, as it might be abused. We'd still be huddled in caves with that kind of thinking.
Comment icon #44 Posted by Leonardo 9 years ago
Those are still subjective. YOU think autism is a disability, and other things not so much. But that is you, not everyone. Once all other disabilities are gone, those non-disability traits may become disabilities. No, autism is a disability as described by the health authorities of every major nation that I am aware of. This is not my opinion, but the opinion of medical experts in whom I have confidence.
Comment icon #45 Posted by DieChecker 9 years ago
No, autism is a disability as described by the health authorities of every major nation that I am aware of. This is not my opinion, but the opinion of medical experts in whom I have confidence. That is not the point. You conveniently go after a detail and fail to answer the actual question. Good deflection attempt. Do you believe that if most disabilities were eliminated that stuff that would not be considered a disability today, such as male pattern hair lose, or nearsightedness, would then be the subject of genetic modification? And then doesn't if follow that parents would want anything the... [More]
Comment icon #46 Posted by DieChecker 9 years ago
There's no sense to following this kind of logic. Ultimately, everything from 'fire' to 'the internet' has the potential for misuse. You can't ignore the potential benefits of a concept, as it might be abused. We'd still be huddled in caves with that kind of thinking. Hey, I'm actually in favor of genetic modification. I'm just pointing out a reality that eventually parents will be able to modify just about anything they like... handedness, hair color and thickness, eye color.... Whatever they want. It is only logical. It will happen, if we allow genetic modifications to become legal. I also n... [More]
Comment icon #47 Posted by LV-426 9 years ago
Hey, I'm actually in favor of genetic modification. I'm just pointing out a reality that eventually parents will be able to modify just about anything they like... handedness, hair color and thickness, eye color.... Whatever they want. It is only logical. It will happen, if we allow genetic modifications to become legal. Possibly. Like I say though, anything that can be beneficial, can (and will) invariably be used for selfish or even harmful motives. All that can be done is to attempt to maintain tight regulation over what is permitted. In all honesty, I don't think it'll eventually matter wh... [More]
Comment icon #48 Posted by Grey Area 9 years ago
Of course, other questions then come into play. How long should an individual lifespan be if science counters natural mortality. How would it affect the world's population without limiting birthrates (and should it even be allowed to affect birthrates). For once, I can sympathize with religious views on the subject too, as it is a huge ethical question. I don't think it will happen like that. There will not be a super pill released that will suddenly flick a switch and all humans will live an extra hundred years. What you are describing is a process, a very subtle one, but it has already start... [More]
Comment icon #49 Posted by Moon Gazer 9 years ago
I think that as long as it is regulated and only used for medical purposes and not "designer babies" then it's a very good thing. Regarding the 3 people responsible for the child, I don't think it would work like that. Usually the birth mother is the one responsible, no matter who has input in to it. I am currently pregnant as a surrogate for my sister who is unable to have her own children. It's my egg and her husbands sperm. I give birth to this child so I legally go on the birth certificate as mother and am the one who receives all the maternity benefits (although obviously we apply for par... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles