Monday, June 16, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

China completes world's largest telescope

By T.K. Randall
July 4, 2016 · Comment icon 27 comments

The massive 500-meter dish will be used to help scientists hunt for signs of extraterrestrial life.
Situated in southwest China's Guizhou Province, the 500m-wide Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) cost $180 million to build and is around the size of 30 football pitches.

The enormous telescope is almost twice as large as the current record holder - Puerto Rico's Arecibo Observatory - and is ten times more sensitive than Germany's Effelsberg telescope.

It is set to begin operations from the beginning of September.

"The project has the potential to search for more strange objects to better understand the origin of the universe and boost the global hunt for extraterrestrial life," said Zheng Xiaonian, deputy head of the National Astonomical Observation under the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Source: Telegraph | Comments (27)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #18 Posted by jpjoe 9 years ago
A culture which drives many species to extinction and suffocates their own citizens for the sake of money, is suddenly interested in spending millions on an unproven ET hunt. Are they going to claim that alien slime can cure cancer? Nothing but another communistic propaganda. Jinping's north korean allies must be very proud.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Nnicolette 9 years ago
No. Thats ridiculous.
Comment icon #20 Posted by Nnicolette 9 years ago
Why would knowing they are here be reason not to locate them? Seems more likely to me that all these hunts we are on mean that they do know that.
Comment icon #21 Posted by Nnicolette 9 years ago
I dont believe i said they wre. Doesnt thier presence on bodies that dont contain life mean that thier presence elsewhere would also not necessarily involve life? Once again that would not necessarily connotate life.
Comment icon #22 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 9 years ago
No, but the way you phrased your post rather implied it.   No one said it did. What I said was: And:   Once again this is a strawman argument as I did not make that claim. There is a huge difference between probability and necessary.
Comment icon #23 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 9 years ago
Why is it ridiculous? Several advocates of the pamspermia hypothesis have suggested that life could have originated on comets.
Comment icon #24 Posted by Nnicolette 9 years ago
Oh i know i got the highest score in my class for writing about panspermia which i thought i came up with in grade school as we were asked to secretly write our beliefs of creatipn or evolution. It has always been a truth to me before outside teachings. But that isnt what i was getting at. My point is that the existence of the molecules on comet does not signify the life exists there, so it isnt really valid to assume that it would exist anywhere else where they are found either. (Phone issues--)arefound
Comment icon #25 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 9 years ago
Do you deliberately misrepresent what people say (including your own posts)? It seems to happen rather too often to be coincidence. You made no such point, you simply dismissed the notion of looking for life on comets as ridiculous. If you had even a tiny fraction of the understanding of panspermia you are claiming to have you would have known that the notion of life on comets is FAR from ridiculous. I'll explain this in simple terms as you don't seem to be grasping the very, VERY simple logic required here: No one is saying that where there are amino acids there MUST be life. Amino acids ARE ... [More]
Comment icon #26 Posted by jpjoe 9 years ago
Contrary to what some scientists onboard the 67P team said in socmed. All of them think that life creation is more plausible on a planet than on a comet. So panspermia is actually not that far from being ridiculous, but not necessarily to be dismissed.
Comment icon #27 Posted by Frank Merton 9 years ago
The Panspermia theory is not that life develops on comets, but that it develops on a planet and then a bit of it gets knocked off onto a comet and transported elsewhere.  The fact that organic chemicals are detected on comets is another issue, and has little to do with the evolution of life unless it should turn out (I think unlikely) that there are certain predecessors for life that can only happen on comets. All this comes, I think, from the fact that some people make a big deal out of how "unlikely" the origin of life is said to be, but the more we learn we seem to be finding out it is not... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles