Friday, April 19, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

SpaceX plans to send humans to Mars by 2022

By T.K. Randall
September 28, 2016 · Comment icon 23 comments

Can humans really get to Mars within just six years ? Image Credit: NASA / Pat Rawlings
Elon Musk has outlined his extraordinarily ambitious plans to make mankind an interplanetary species.
Speaking at the International Astronautical Congress in Guadalajara, Mexico this week, the SpaceX CEO suggested that a manned mission to Mars could happen within as little as six years.

"What I really want to try to achieve here is to make Mars seem possible - like it's something we can achieve in our lifetimes," he told the audience.

To this end, Musk outlined the design and development of a new multi-stage launch and transport system with a massive reusable rocket booster that would be as long as two Boeing 747 aircraft.

Capable of carrying up to 100 people, this gargantuan booster could be refuelled in orbit and may eventually even be able to travel beyond Mars to other worlds such as Jupiter and Saturn.
Musk also suggested that the first ship should be named "Heart of Gold" as a tribute to Douglas Adams' science fiction novel The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

While questions still remain about the cost and technological feasibility of sending humans to Mars so soon, the plans have been generally well received elsewhere in the scientific community.

"NASA applauds all those who want to take the next giant leap - and advance the journey to Mars," NASA said in a statement. "We are very pleased that the global community is working to meet the challenges of a sustainable human presence on Mars."

"This journey will require the best and the brightest minds from government and industry, and the fact that Mars is a major topic of discussion is very encouraging."



Source: The Guardian | Comments (23)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #14 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 8 years ago
Elon Musk is a multi-billionaire business man and owner of the most successful private launch vehicle company in history, you aren't. Elon Musk's company have successfully developed their own launch vehicles, pioneered reusable rockets and become the first private company in history to successfully recover a spacecraft from orbit. In short Elon Musk has vast experience when it comes to spaceflight and launch vehicles, you don't. Elon Musk's SpaceX has reduced the cost of launching large payloads to orbit and, as a result, won a vast number of orders to launch satellites and forced his closest ... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by highdesert50 8 years ago
The dreamers, visionaries and adventurers define a civilization. If it were not for the like, we would still be awaiting the first wave of humans to depart Africa. How interesting it might be if Mr Musk were to establish a kickstarter where individuals could vote with a one dollar contribution to both recognize the importance of moving civilization to another planet but to do so as an international community. Even the most obtuse politicians might take notice.
Comment icon #16 Posted by Habitat 8 years ago
  I am not dumb enough to fall for this guff about reducing the cost of getting payloads into orbit somehow equating to a  bunch of people being sent one-way to Mars to set up a self-sustaining colony. Literally, the two are worlds apart. This $200,000 ticket garbage is just that, garbage. Thanks for your pomposity anyhow. 
Comment icon #17 Posted by Derek Willis 8 years ago
Whilst Elon Musk is undoubtedly a pioneering entrepreneur, it ought to be remembered that Space-X only got properly going through being given $400 million of taxpayers money via NASA towards developing the Falcon rocket and Dragon capsule (about half the overall cost), and a $1.6 billion dollar contract to launch supply missions to the ISS. Without $2 billion of taxpayers money it would have taken far longer for Space-X to - literally - get off the ground. Edit: and to put the ticket price into context, Virgin Galactic are charging $250,000 for a five minute lob into space. Who am I to doubt E... [More]
Comment icon #18 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 8 years ago
Let's put it FULLY into context. The cost of a Virgin Galactic ticket is the INITIAL cost of a ticket. Richard Branson fully expects the price to drop when he has a large fleet of spacecraft operating from multiple spaceports.  The cost of the SpaceX ticket is the price Elon Musk believes he can EVENTUALLY charge once he has a large fleet of spacecraft in operation.  I agree that this price is optimist, the entire project is, that is not what I was objecting too. What I was objecting too was Habitat just inventing a figure out of thin air.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Derek Willis 8 years ago
Well let's add some figures to the context. So far $600 million has been invested in Virgin Galactic. Each flight will carry six passengers at $250,000 per ticket, a total of $1.5 million per flight. Let's be optimistic and say they can achieve a 20% net profit per flight. That is a net profit of $300,000 per flight. At that rate it will take 2,000 flights to cover the investment. Building new spaceports and more space-planes will of course cost more money. It is going to be a very long time before Virgin can reduce the cost of the tickets. My suggestion regarding the $200,000 mentioned by E... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by Clair 8 years ago
Doesn't look as though Musk will be on board the fist Mars colony ship...
Comment icon #21 Posted by Derek Willis 8 years ago
Australia became a British colony in 1770. The first member of the Royal Family did not go to Australia until almost a century later, when Prince Alfred visited in 1867. During his second visit someone shot him! Because of the various dangers involved, and the time needed to get there by ship, the first ruling monarch to visit Australia was Queen Elizabeth, who went there in 1954. So it is understandable that Elon Musk will not want to go to Mars until the journey is considered safe. He once said he wanted to die on Mars - as an old man!
Comment icon #22 Posted by Habitat 8 years ago
Any nation with a public debt of near $20 Trillion would have rocks in its collective head to subscribe to subsiding this absurdly expensive exercise, which will make the bill for the Apollo program look like small change. The $200,000 is just a nonsense figure to drum up public interest, but there is no way this scheme should be on the public tit, even if the treasury was in surplus.
Comment icon #23 Posted by Derek Willis 8 years ago
Throughout history the early stages of colonisation - the Americas, for instance - were funded by monarchs, the church, and merchants. The colonists themselves didn't have to come up with the money, or if they did it was heavily subsidised. The motive for everyone involved was to gain riches and/or a better life. Whether Mars can provide those things is debatable. I may be totally wrong about this, but I think Elon Musk's long term goal is to develop the necessary technology and then say to the governments of the world: "If you pay for it, I will provide the transport and infrastructure to co... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles