Tuesday, February 18, 2020
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Cahokia wasn't actually a 'lost civilization'


Posted on Wednesday, 5 February, 2020 | Comment icon 2 comments

The city's mounds remain a popular tourist attraction. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Skubasteve834
The inhabitants of the pre-Columbian Native American city did disappear for a time, but then they came back.
The vast city, which was once home to the Mississippian indigenous culture, has long been surrounded in mystery and intrigue due to its inhabitants' disappearance in the mid 1300s.

The abandonment of the city - which lasted from around 1450 to 1550 CE - was thought to have been driven by factors such as drought, flooding, climate change and resource shortages.

Now however, scientists from the University of California, Berkeley have shed new light on the enigma by revealing that the city's people may not have actually 'disappeared' at all because they returned to live there again not long afterwards.
It wasn't until the beginning of the 18th Century - long after the arrival of European settlers - that the city's population began to decline again.

The new study involved analyzing the molecular signatures (or stanols) of human faeces in the local sediment. The more stanols they found, the larger the local population would have been.

"It is important to note that the depopulation of Cahokia in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries was not the end of an indigenous presence in the Horseshoe Lake watershed, despite a lack of archaeological evidence and research emphasis on Mississippian occupations," the study authors wrote.

"By acknowledging a repopulation following the Mississippian decline, we move closer to a narrative of native persistence over disappearance."

Source: Science Alert | Comments (2)

Tags: Cahokia

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Piney on 27 January, 2020, 22:18
The Illini were part of the Hopewell Horizon and related to the Fort Ancient Culture. They were probably the original residents. What happened in Cahokia was Algonquians learned fast why not to build a city and went back to agro-foresty. C.G. Mann already noted this and Archaeologists knew it wasn't a "lost tribe" for about 2 decades, at least. 
Comment icon #2 Posted by Myles on 5 February, 2020, 14:01
I've been to the Cahokia Mounds park a few times.  Pretty cool place to visit if you are in the St. Louis area.    If I remember correctly, the population may have reached around 40,000 at one point.   


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6660824
277898
183825

 
Scientists are developing bouncy pavements
2-17-2020
A novel new type of rubber pavement being trialled in Sweden could help to save thousands of lives.
Ice makes strange sounds in bizarre new video
2-17-2020
Dropping a chunk of ice down a 450ft borehole can produce weird sounds resembling cartoon ricochets.
Arrokoth rewrites theory of planet formation
2-17-2020
New Horizons' encounter with a Kuiper belt object has turned what we know of planet formation on its head.
Live tree frog is found inside a green pepper
2-16-2020
An unsuspecting amphibian recently found itself at the center of a very peculiar mystery in Quebec, Canada.
Stories & Experiences
The babysitter
2-8-2020 | ON
 
Mystery brain surgery and JFK
2-7-2020 | Toronto Ontario Canada
 
 
I keep bringing spirits home
2-7-2020 | Michigan
 
Dog and Jamaican statue
1-10-2020 | Canada
 
 
Life changing experience
12-19-2019 | Australia
 
Unexplained smoke or fog
12-19-2019 | West Texas, USA
 
He came in the night
12-19-2019 | CA
 
My reptilian encounter
11-24-2019 | Ireland and Australia
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 Unexplained-Mysteries.com (c) 2001-2020
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ