The former child actress, who starred in the iconic horror film, suffered significant real-life injuries during filming.
When it was released, the original Exorcist was so terrifying that some unsuspecting cinemagoers ended up passing out in the theater. Things didn't go much better behind the cameras either.
When shooting began in 1972, a fire tore through the set of Regan MacNiel's home, causing extensive damage. In a peculiar twist, the room used for the actual exorcism scenes escaped unscathed.
Actors Jack MacGowran and Vasiliki Maliaros both died shortly after filming had wrapped and both Linda Blair and Max von Sydow suffered the loss of close family members during shooting.
Jason Miller's son nearly died in a motorcycle accident and several actors were injured onset.
One of those who suffered injury was Linda Blair herself who, during filming, had been strapped into a special contraption designed to flail her body around to make her appear possessed.
One day during filming the lacing that was designed to support her came loose, leaving her flailing around so violently that she fractured her lower spine and was left in agony.
Blair herself can be seen speaking out about the incident in the below clip from new docuseries Cursed Films which explores some of the stories behind famous movie curses.
The footage that was recorded at the time of the accident was later used in the actual film.
That's not all that accurate as far as Hollywood goes: http://www.theoccultmuseum.com/haunted-hollywood-10-cursed-movies-time/ People thinking movie productions being cursed is a fairly equal opportunity setting.
Re Seti42 above. Nature is not just chaos & randomness. Otherwise science would be futile. Science itself is about finding patterns in nature. A lot of people jump to conclusions on pretty flimsy evidence but too many scientists only use reason to undermine reason. The universe is not meaningless. Read C.S.Lewis essay "De Futilitate" to see why a materialistic philosophy contradicts itself. .
If the universe is cruel & unfair where do we get this idea from? What are we comparing it to? We have a basic idea of justice that science can't explain. If we were wholly the product of a meaningless universe we wouldn't have. So there must be more to it. The problem of evil remains but the alternative is a universe where nothing matters .
I don't think animals have a sense of justice like we do even if they understand pain & suffering. Justice is a moral sense and relies on abstract reasoning. We are free to flout it or ignore it as many do. Instinct is different. Sometimes justice can get you killed. Not very beneficial if it's all just survival of the fittest .
Instinct and the moral law are not the same although many scientists like to make out that they are. We are not obliged to obey our instincts. We could ignore the child's distress if we were too busy to stop and help or if it involved putting ourselves in danger. Instincts can contradict each other. The moral law is what decides between them. We may choose to help even if we don't want to.
The room with the prayers actually was untouched: This sounds bad: It also says some of the actors died shortly after the filming and there was a motorcycle crash. I recently just watched this movie, and it is a little boring compared to more modern films.
I actually enjoy part 3 with brad Dourif best it had a odd feel like phantasm films which i like, I was young when the first exorcist came out and it did for possession etc, what Jaws did for sharks, close encounters did for aliens etc, people did go nuts for a spell. We have a guest room, that we call Regans room.
Please Login or Register to post a comment.