Monday, September 9, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

'Doomsday wreck' could explode and produce a tsunami, experts warn

By T.K. Randall
August 16, 2024 · Comment icon 15 comments
Wreck of the SS Richard Montgomery
The ship's masts are still visible above the water. Image Credit: CC BY SA 2.0 Christine Matthews
The wreck of a World War II era cargo ship off the coast of England is still carrying a large amount of explosives.
Built during the Second World War, the SS Richard Montgomery is perhaps the most dangerous shipwreck in the world thanks to its cargo of over 1,400 tons of explosives.

Ever since it sank beneath the Thames Estuary back in 1944, other ships have steered well clear of its large masts which, even today, continue to protrude from the water's surface.

Most worrying of all, however, is the fact that its explosive cargo still has the potential to detonate, especially if another ship were to accidentally collide with its masts.

In a worst case scenario, in which the vessel's entire ordnance explodes at the same time, it could send a potentially catastrophic tsunami up the River Thames in the direction of London.

Determining exactly what to do to make the wreck safe, however, has long proven a challenge.
Plans are currently in motion to remove the masts, but some experts argue that this will not be enough.

David Welch - a senior explosives officer at bomb disposal company Ramora - maintains that the only way to render the wreck safe is for the UK government to actively remove the explosives from it.

"I do think that someone's going to have to do something soon, in the next decade, or we're going to miss the boat," he said. "The wreck is falling apart, as all wrecks do, and munitions are falling out of it."

"Over time, that's only going to get worse and then you'll end up with an uncontained area of munitions. There's small fishing vessels in the area, there's all sorts of other activities, and you don't want these items to become lost."

"If you fast forward 100 years, the likelihood is the wreck won't be there, but the pile of munitions will."

Source: Mail Online | Comments (15)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #6 Posted by CrimsonKing 24 days ago
I honestly don't believe it could cause a tsunami... It takes an incredible amount of energy to do so,and I'm just not sure 1 ship even loaded down could create such a force....maybe 5-10 packed ships.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 24 days ago
I agree with you, but keep in mind this wreck is in the Thames River and not in the open ocean.
Comment icon #8 Posted by CrimsonKing 24 days ago
You're correct, it's also fairly shallow,so I guess it could be possible...
Comment icon #9 Posted by Skulduggery 23 days ago
Out of curiosity, would it not be reasonable to just evacuate the area around the river and just blow it to smithereens and get it over with? This isn't my area of expertise so I am posing this question to those more knowledgeable on the subject than I am.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 22 days ago
It's in the estuary to the river, not in the narrow part of the river itself. This, in fact, makes it worse, since any waves generated would be funnelled from the wide river mouth into the narrower river. This increases the height of the waves as the river narrows. Not great in a densely populated region. Image from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Richard_Montgomery  
Comment icon #11 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 22 days ago
No it's not, the exact opposite in fact. Since these explosives are now unstable and as @A rather obscure Bassoon pointed out, sensitive to impacts then it brings the chances of a chain reaction into play. All it would take is one shell to explode, the force of that small explosion would cause surrounding munitions to explode and so on. One small bang triggers one massive boom.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Jon the frog 22 days ago
Making publicity out of it and some insane people will try to make it blow for their own agenda... they need to get rid of it before something happen. Don't know if they can have issue with thunder hitting the mast ???.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Buzz_Light_Year 22 days ago
Images of another ammo ship that exploded during WWII. USS Mount Hood was literally obliterated by the blast and a repair ship along side the USS Mindanao and all the holes caused by the blast. Everybody on deck died on the USS Mindanao. As far as I know there weren't any reports of a Tsunami occurring in the aftermath.  https://www.historynet.com/mount-hood-explosion/ So the explosion would be immense should the ship explode. I always thought it was ironic that two ships with the name Hood were both obliterated in WWII. Then there was the Port Chicago disaster in California when the E.A. Br... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by A rather obscure Bassoon 20 days ago
It seems this is based on a MOD assesment  back in the 70’s and is now an unlikely scenario as the wreck sits in more than 15 metres of water.   https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/uk-most-dangerous-shipwreck-ss-richard-montgomery-packed-tnt-thames-tsunami-1704484#:~:text=The scenario of a five-metre tsunami%2C which dates,about 15m – to cause such a wave.  
Comment icon #15 Posted by Dejarma 20 days ago
i agree


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles