Monday, January 13, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Palaeontology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All â–¾
Search Submit

Palaeontology

Newly identified species of human may have been more intelligent than us

By T.K. Randall
December 2, 2024 · Comment icon 27 comments
Early humans
We now know of multiple distinct human species. Image Credit: Pixabay / Jackdrafahl
Palaeontologists have discovered a previously unrecognized species of ancient human that lived 100,000 years ago.
Could we have once lived alongside another species of human that was more intelligent than us ?

That is the possibility raised by the recent discovery that certain fossils previously thought to have belonged to other species were actually those of an entirely new group of ancient humans.

These have since come to be named Homo juluensis (or "large head people").

As the name suggests, these ancient humans, who roamed what is now China, had a significantly larger head and brain size than any other human species - including ourselves - raising the possibility that they may have been more intelligent than even we are today.

Scientists believe that they likely hunted horses and other animals in small groups.
Little else, however, is known about these mysterious humans.

If they were more intelligent than we are - why did they go extinct and we didn't ?

Could they be a hybrid of two or more other species of human ?

"It is becoming increasingly clear that [in] the eastern Asian hominin fossils... a greater degree of morphological variation is present than originally assumed or anticipated," the study authors wrote.

"If anything, the eastern Asian record is prompting us to recognize just how complex human evolution is more generally and really forcing us to revise and rethink our interpretations of various evolutionary models to better match the growing fossil record."

Source: Science Alert | Comments (27)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #18 Posted by Portre 1 month ago
I'm sure it was a good time for all involved.
Comment icon #19 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
Is "species" better or worse than "race?" And how do we know it was "back"-breeding? Sounds racist, to me. A bit 19th-century. History is written by the winner. We think our traits are the most positive ones because we are the extant population and our current lifestyle and culture is adapted to our physical and intellectual needs. 
Comment icon #20 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
"That concept went out of fashion..." I get that, for current populations it's a very gray area and frankly, given the amount of overlap, nonsensical. However, I daresay it makes more sense than calling populations that can breed and produce viable offspring different species from each other. The nomenclature just seems to be getting out of hand. It is something of a testament to the ever-changing nature of the classification system, I suppose. Kingdom Monera being divided up as late as 1977, for example, shows not only my age but also the idea that classifications are subject to adaptation. ... [More]
Comment icon #21 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
Gyrification would be the academic term. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4879055/ Me, I'm just a normie.
Comment icon #22 Posted by Ell 1 month ago
The distinctions are sometimes subtle. Some populations once thought to be one species, upon more research proved to be two or more distinct species. Recently in the news were two species of Galapagos finch breeding and producing hybrid offspring that is recognized as a new species of finch.
Comment icon #23 Posted by C L Palmer 1 month ago
If they were human, would that be considered a species or just a sub-population? It's interesting how culture and political dynamics play into this when it comes to humans. Not that it should or shouldn't. Just that it does.
Comment icon #24 Posted by Piney 1 month ago
Our "Molecular Clock" tells us. I have Neanderthal and Denisovan traits. You just Neanderthal.
Comment icon #25 Posted by Ell 1 month ago
The hybrid finch? From what I recall it breeds true, so that would make it a species. Time will tell, though.
Comment icon #26 Posted by jethrofloyd 1 month ago
Just put them in the 'Aliens' section.
Comment icon #27 Posted by simplybill 1 month ago
Without the presence of nearby artifacts, I suppose it’s possible they were more intelligent than us, but not necessarily more advanced. I mean, not everyone craves the latest iPhone.  ?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles