Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

New treaty to ban space based weapons

Posted on Tuesday, 15 March, 2011 | Comment icon 68 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: AFRL

 
A new treaty has been proposed to disallow the use of weapons in space for humans and for aliens.

The Outer Space Security and Development Treaty of 2011 invites UN members to be signatories and is designed to create a framework "that will assure and verify that space is and will remain a neutral realm from which all classes of space-based weapons are banned in perpetuity".

"The proposed space treaty has roots dating back nearly 40 years, when Rosin worked with Wernher von Braun, the "father of rocketry," who was the chief architect of the giant Saturn V rockets that propelled American astronauts to the moon."

  View: Full article

 Source: AOL News


  Discuss: View comments (68)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #59 Posted by regeneratia on 21 March, 2011, 18:57
As if the predominant dark thoughts of our present governments world-wide could direct some outside-of-earth-and-local-dimension-and-other-timely entity with far greater intelligence and wisdom!! I mean the thought is laughable.
Comment icon #60 Posted by Taun on 21 March, 2011, 19:07
Anyone who has any understanding of even basic physics can tell you, you don't need to take weapons into space... All you need is a big rock (asteroid) and a gravity well... the Earth... Read Robert Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress"....
Comment icon #61 Posted by arenee on 21 March, 2011, 19:38
And how many of you read the Borg's lines in the 'collectives voice' in your head? (If so does that mean they are already here? ) I admit it without shame...I had fun, I even read it more than once...in the voice of course.
Comment icon #62 Posted by Druidus-Logos on 21 March, 2011, 20:30
Anyone who has any understanding of even basic physics can tell you, you don't need to take weapons into space... All you need is a big rock (asteroid) and a gravity well... the Earth... Read Robert Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress".... That's an EXCELLENT book, Taun. Nice literary taste. Indeed, why use weaponry when you could launch a small moon or asteroid at a planet? Again, they would be capable of this, with their harnessing of extreme energy levels. The fact is, if aliens get here while we haven't mastered much higher energy levels, then they can do whatever they want, regardles... [More]
Comment icon #63 Posted by AZDZ on 21 March, 2011, 22:56
Is this a joke, or another preliminary step towards Disclosure? Given they existed at all, how the hell could we prevent them from doing anything they wanted? Wouldn't a space weapons ban with them only make sense if they were 'at the table' too? Anyone who has any understanding of even basic physics can tell you, you don't need to take weapons into space... All you need is a big rock (asteroid) and a gravity well... the Earth... Read Robert Heinlein's "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress".... What if they wanted to preserve our structures for their own habitation?
Comment icon #64 Posted by Druidus-Logos on 22 March, 2011, 0:06
Is this a joke, or another preliminary step towards Disclosure? Given they existed at all, how the hell could we prevent them from doing anything they wanted? Wouldn't a space weapons ban with them only make sense if they were 'at the table' too? What if they wanted to preserve our structures for their own habitation? Well, likely, their body plans would be different, and they'd have no need for colonization. The point of banning it for them is just to show that we want peace with them. Of course we can't do anything if they don't want it. But at least it shows we're trying to do better than w... [More]
Comment icon #65 Posted by tlsmith1138 on 22 March, 2011, 0:21
The only reality here is, we are trying to save face by declaring we can't stop an advanced alien civilizations boy scout group from handing us our butts not because we technologically suck, but because we choose to have our butts handed to us. I'm sure the aliens will have a chuckle. . . as they take this mutha over.
Comment icon #66 Posted by Grey Area on 22 March, 2011, 2:24
No, I'm using logic. To travel the void requires vast amounts of energy. To produce that energy, you'd have to be beyond petty needs. You'd need to harness SUNS, not just planetary energy sources. Don't you see? There's no reason to harm us if you can already do that. You can do nearly anything with those energy levels. Exactly, and not a projection to future behaviour. If you think we will still be at the mercy of our history by the time we harness Sol's energy, than I'm afraid I see that as ridiculous. We are going to change ourselves as a species in order to get to that state. Human history... [More]
Comment icon #67 Posted by Lcvec on 22 March, 2011, 16:26
Why are most of you being so negative about this? Who cares if there is no real weight to it or if some nations won't participate or if aliens visit or not? The GOOD thing about it is that we are thinking along the right lines! The good thing is that there are many people getting together and saying something far more enlightened than those clods who shoot at UFOs! It's a 'step' in the right direction. Now look at a hypothetical. Imagine if aliens were monitoring us. Don't you think they'd be glad to see something like this? Don't you think they'd be more likely to make contact when they see u... [More]
Comment icon #68 Posted by Rlyeh on 22 March, 2011, 17:12
You'd need to harness SUNS, not just planetary energy sources. Don't you see? There's no reason to harm us if you can already do that. You can do nearly anything with those energy levels.Exactly, and not a projection to future behaviour. If you think we will still be at the mercy of our history by the time we harness Sol's energy, than I'm afraid I see that as ridiculous. We are going to change ourselves as a species in order to get to that state. Thats a bit of a jump. Harnessing the power of stars in no shape or form implies lack of aggression or hostility. We haven't harnessed the power of ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Time is key to happiness, new study claims
7-25-2017
According to researchers, stressing out over a lack of time is a leading cause of anxiety and depression.
Eden Project UFO revealed as publicity stunt
7-25-2017
Videos and pictures of an alleged UFO over Cornwall have turned out to be part of a promotional exercise.
Moon is much wetter than previously thought
7-25-2017
Satellite data has revealed that there is water trapped all across the Moon's surface, not just at the poles.
New species of giant sunfish discovered
7-24-2017
Marine researcher Marianne Nyegaard has identified the first new species of sunfish in over 130 years.
Other news in this category
Moon is much wetter than previously thought
Posted 7-25-2017 | 6 comments
Satellite data has revealed that there is water trapped all across the Moon's surface, not just at the poles....
 
SpaceX ditches plans for 2018 Mars landing
Posted 7-21-2017 | 5 comments
Plans to land a modified version of the company's reusable Dragon capsule on Mars have been scrapped....
 
Today marks 48 years since first Moon landing
Posted 7-20-2017 | 13 comments
Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong made history when they set foot on the lunar surface 48 years ago today....
 
NASA reveals amazing new Pluto flyover video
Posted 7-16-2017 | 14 comments
The footage has been constructed from the thousands of photographs taken by the New Horizons probe....
 
NASA doesn't have the funds to land on Mars
Posted 7-14-2017 | 24 comments
The space agency has admitted that it cannot currently afford to land humans on the surface of Mars....
 
Juno offers up stunning new images of Jupiter
Posted 7-13-2017 | 10 comments
The space probe has captured staggeringly detailed shots of Jupiter's centuries-old Great Red Spot....
 
Juno set to fly over Jupiter's Great Red Spot
Posted 7-10-2017 | 1 comment
NASA's Juno probe will soon be embarking on a long-awaited flyby of Jupiter's most prominent feature....
 
Mars may be a lot more toxic than we thought
Posted 7-7-2017 | 8 comments
New research has shown that the Martian soil is quite an inhospitable environment for microbial life....
 
Astronomers discover methanol on Enceladus
Posted 7-5-2017 | 11 comments
An unexpectedly high amount of the organic molecule has been found coming from Saturn's icy moon....
 
Hawking: 'Trump could turn Earth in to Venus'
Posted 7-5-2017 | 177 comments
In an interview on his 75th birthday, Professor Stephen Hawking warned of the dangers of global warming....
 
First Mars rover landed 20 years ago today
Posted 7-4-2017 | 2 comments
It has been exactly two decades since NASA's Pathfinder mission touched down on the surface of Mars....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ