Wednesday, July 26, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Were early human ancestors ‘aquatic apes’ ?

Posted on Monday, 29 April, 2013 | Comment icon 65 comments | News tip by: Roiberto


Image credit: Robert Griner

 
The controversial theory that humans evolved from amphibious apes has been gaining new support.

The aquatic apes theory suggests that apes first emerged from the water, lost their fur, started walking upright and then went on to develop large brains. The idea was widely publicized over 50 years ago by marine biologist Alister Hardy and now enjoys support from several big names including naturalist Sir David Attenborough.

Of particular note with regard to the theory is the fact that humans are very different from other apes in that we possess attributes that are more common in aquatic mammals. Did these traits appear at different times as conventional theories suggest or was it because our ancestors lived in or near water for millions of years ?

"A controversial theory that humans evolved from amphibious apes has won new support."

  View: Full article

 Source: Complete Genomics


  Discuss: View comments (65)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #56 Posted by docyabut2 on 15 May, 2013, 23:00
We can tell by the expression of the genes responsible for the presence or lack of hair. And as posted earlier said genes date to c. 1.2 million years ago. And the 'earlier homo sapiens' only date to c.200,000 years ago, so well within the timeframe for the overall loss of body hair. All of which makes the 'aquatic ape theory' about as useless as a leg-less man at a butt kicking contest. cormac How can they judge the gene of hairlessness went dorment 1,2million years ago.? by other mammels, hommids or what?
Comment icon #57 Posted by EnderOTD on 15 May, 2013, 23:20
One of the faux educational channels did a mock-u-mentary about this, Mermaids!!! Most of the people i know that brought it up believed it was the honest to god truth because the saw it on T.V. I call it A.A. syndrome. Any ways who's to say we didn't lose our body hair(some of us did, not me lol), because we started makeshifting animal skins and furs to clothes our bodies as we slowly migrated to cooler climates? I didn't see that anywhere but just my couple cents.
Comment icon #58 Posted by cormac mac airt on 15 May, 2013, 23:21
How can they judge the gene of hairlessness went dorment 1,2million years ago.? by other mammels, hommids or what? They compare the expression and differences between the gene from looking at same within 1) humans versus chimpanzees; 2) Africans versus Europeans and 3) include a comparison of Hss (us) and Neanderthal genes. All together of which points to a timeframe of c.1.2 million years BP. cormac
Comment icon #59 Posted by docyabut2 on 16 May, 2013, 7:49
They compare the expression and differences between the gene from looking at same within 1) humans versus chimpanzees; 2) Africans versus Europeans and 3) include a comparison of Hss (us) and Neanderthal genes. All together of which points to a timeframe of c.1.2 million years BP. cormac Cormac gee maybe I don`t understand:),but how can they compare a hair growing gene that supposely went dorment in parts of our bodies to the chimpanzees and in the Neaderthals to 1,2million years ago when hair still grows. The Neaderthals were only about 40,000 years ago, how do we know they were as hairless a... [More]
Comment icon #60 Posted by cormac mac airt on 16 May, 2013, 12:56
Cormac gee maybe I don`t understand:),but how can they compare a hair growing gene that supposely went dorment in parts of our bodies to the chimpanzees and in the Neaderthals to 1,2million years ago when hair still grows. The Neaderthals were only about 40,000 years ago, how do we know they were as hairless as us? It's the same gene expressed in different ways over the timeframe of the groups I mentioned previously. Meaning that it didn't just magically appear one day, it's always been there. And while Neanderthals went extinct c.40,000 BP, they and Homo sapiens diverged from their common anc... [More]
Comment icon #61 Posted by Chooky88 on 18 May, 2013, 23:22
I first heard this theory in high school in the 80s and I think it's very plausible. Look at your nose. Unlike other 'apes' our nostrils point down, not out front. Theorists state this is so they don't fill with water when swimming.
Comment icon #62 Posted by docyabut2 on 19 May, 2013, 23:01
Well I still don`nt get it, I think we were all a bunch of hairy beings just like the apes, until we went swimming in the ocean waters.:)
Comment icon #63 Posted by cormac mac airt on 19 May, 2013, 23:09
Well I still don`nt get it, I think we were all a bunch of hairy beings just like the apes, until we went swimming in the ocean waters. :) You're entitled to believe what you want. The evidence however suggests otherwise. cormac
Comment icon #64 Posted by lightly on 20 May, 2013, 0:56
Aquatics were thought to be extinct , until pods were spotted on the Florida coast. Pod of female aquatics performing a courting ritual to attract male aquatics
Comment icon #65 Posted by marc verhaegen on 31 May, 2013, 19:14
Humans didn’t descend from aquatic apes, of course, although our ancestors were too slow & heavy for regular running over open plains as some anthropologists still believe. Instead, Pleistocene Homo populations simply followed the coasts & rivers in Africa & Eurasia. 800,000 years ago, they even reached Flores more than 18 km overseas. - google “econiche Homo” - eBook “Was Man more aquatic in the past?” introd.Phillip Tobias http://www.benthamscience.com/ebooks/9781608052448/index.htm - guest post at Greg Laden’s blog http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2013/01/30/common-misconceptio... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Time is key to happiness, new study claims
7-25-2017
According to researchers, stressing out over a lack of time is a leading cause of anxiety and depression.
Eden Project UFO revealed as publicity stunt
7-25-2017
Videos and pictures of an alleged UFO over Cornwall have turned out to be part of a promotional exercise.
Moon is much wetter than previously thought
7-25-2017
Satellite data has revealed that there is water trapped all across the Moon's surface, not just at the poles.
New species of giant sunfish discovered
7-24-2017
Marine researcher Marianne Nyegaard has identified the first new species of sunfish in over 130 years.
Other news in this category
Could a human actually outrun a T. rex ?
Posted 7-17-2017 | 17 comments
Contrary to the plot of Jurassic Park, a rampaging Tyrannosaurus rex wouldn't actually move very fast....
 
Giant prehistoric crocodile had T. rex teeth
Posted 7-4-2017 | 2 comments
Palaeontologists have been studying the remains of a crocodile-like land predator from the Jurassic era....
 
Intense volcanism gave rise to the dinosaurs
Posted 6-20-2017 | 5 comments
A mass extinction event 200 million years ago made it possible for the dinosaurs to dominate the planet....
 
T. rex did not have feathers, say scientists
Posted 6-10-2017 | 16 comments
The idea that Tyrannosaurus rex had a thick plumage of feathers has been called in to serious doubt....
 
Ancient fossil bird found trapped in amber
Posted 6-9-2017 | 1 comment
The incredibly well-preserved hatchling is believed to date back 99 million years to the Cretaceous Era....
 
Earliest Homo sapiens unearthed in Morocco
Posted 6-8-2017 | 8 comments
The discovery casts doubt on the idea that modern humans evolved in a single 'cradle of humanity'....
 
Giant prehistoric sloth unearthed in LA metro
Posted 6-3-2017 | 4 comments
A recent excavation in the heart of Los Angeles has yielded evidence of giant prehistoric beasts....
 
Ancient sea monster was the size of a bus
Posted 5-26-2017 | 3 comments
Palaeontologists in Russia have discovered a huge new sea creature that lived 130 million years ago....
 
Europe, not Africa, was birthplace of mankind
Posted 5-23-2017 | 25 comments
A remarkable new palaeontological discovery in Europe could rewrite the history of human evolution....
 
Tyrannosaurus rex bit with incredible force
Posted 5-19-2017 | 1 comment
The prehistoric carnivore was capable of exerting 8,000 pounds of force with its huge gaping jaws....
 
Extinction asteroid hit 'worst possible place'
Posted 5-15-2017 | 6 comments
Scientists have been drilling in to the crater left behind by the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ