NASA disputes Ed Mitchell camera claim

NASA is in the wrong on this one.

NASA's probably still sore because Edger Mitchell claims NASA is covering up the truth about UFO's. What would they have to be sore about if he were? We're all well aware of Dr. Mitchell's beliefs. Further, he's fully aware that they're beliefs and that there's nothing to oprove his beliefs. It's really rather harmless stuff... NASA is in the wrong on this one. I guess we'll find out about that one day when the litigation regarding legal title to this camera is over, huh?

What would they have to be sore about if he were? We're all well aware of Dr. Mitchell's beliefs. Further, he's fully aware that they're beliefs and that there's nothing to oprove his beliefs. It's really rather harmless stuff... 'What would they have to be sore about..." A high profile retired astronaut, in effect, continues very publically, to accuse NASA of lying to the world... You can 'toe the perty line' if you like but I know what institutions - people - can be like.

I wish I could see your Face Palm on this issue Mid ? It would be worth more than that Hassleblaaa !

'What would they have to be sore about..." A high profile retired astronaut, in effect, continues very publically, to accuse NASA of lying to the world... You can 'toe the perty line' if you like but I know what institutions - people - can be like. High profile? Define that nebulous terminology. I have never heard Ed get vehement about NASA hiding things. He's never been embarrasing...to anyone but himself at times, perhaps. I think he did mildly annoy Al Shepard at times in the day. I've also never heard anyone at NASA complain about him or sanction him at all. And what does "toe the perty li... [More]

I Agree with Device, NASA doesn't like what E. Mitchell has to say about UFO's

I Agree with Device, NASA doesn't like what E. Mitchell has to say about UFO's Well, It is of course one's prerogative to believe anything one wants. Lord knows we've seen that illustrated vigorously on this board in many cases. I don't know of anything I've ever seen to support the idea that NASA is persecuting Dr. Mitchell by making a big deal about this camera because of Mitchell's opinions about ETs and all that. Personally, I'd love to see something substantiating that, so I could personally contact the repsonsible party at the responsible center and then contact the Congressperson and Se... [More]

Well, It is of course one's prerogative to believe anything one wants. Lord knows we've seen that illustrated vigorously on this board in many cases. I don't know of anything I've ever seen to support the idea that NASA is persecuting Dr. Mitchell by making a big deal about this camera because of Mitchell's opinions about ETs and all that. Personally, I'd love to see something substantiating that, so I could personally contact the repsonsible party at the responsible center and then contact the Congressperson and Senator of that district and have them check out what our money is being wasted o... [More]

Well, jeez MID, why wait for substantiation? Go for it. Contact them and let us know the results. I'd be very interested in your research. Jeez. I'd probably have to contact someone at HQ. Ever try to talk to anyone at any HQ and get some information????

'What would they have to be sore about..." A high profile retired astronaut, in effect, continues very publically, to accuse NASA of lying to the world... You can 'toe the perty line' if you like but I know what institutions - people - can be like. I Agree with Device, NASA doesn't like what E. Mitchell has to say about UFO's I'm with MID on this one. I've never seen Mitchell accuse NASA of anything. You would be hard pressed to find him doing so because I'm fairly confident that he never has. On the contrary, I can recall occasions where he has directly stated that as far as he is aware NASA ... [More]