Sunday, April 22, 2018
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Mystery of the 100-million-year old hammer


Posted on Wednesday, 9 April, 2014 | Comment icon 72 comments

The hammer was found near London, Texas. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Rolintt
A mysterious hammer was discovered in Texas in 1934 embedded inside a rock several million years old.
The peculiar object is an example of an out of place artifact (oopart), a term that is generally applied to the discovery of a modern object that seems to have originated from a time period that pre-dates its invention.

The 'London Hammer' has been the subject of several tests and a lot of controversy since it was first discovered in Texas by a hiker in the 1930s. An analysis conducted at the Battelle Laboratory in Ohio, the same place that NASA sent some of the moon rocks for testing, was said to have determined that the hammer possessed unusual metallurgical properties.

The question of the hammer's age however is one that has divided researchers. Carl Baugh, who currently possesses the artifact, maintains that the hammer is literally prehistoric and that its handle has turned to coal over the ages. He also writes that fossils within the surrounding rock "retain fine detail, indicating that they were not reworked, but part of the original formation," suggesting that both the rock and the hammer are from the same time period.

Skeptic Glen J. Kuban however believes differently. In a 1997 paper he claimed that all testing on the object had been conducted privately and not at the Battelle Laboratory as had been originally implied. He also maintained that inconclusive test results had dated the hammer back just 700 years and that Baugh had delayed a full carbon dating test because he didn't want to be proven wrong.

So does the London Hammer really date back several million years or is it simply a relic from the recent past ? To date the true age and origins of this enigmatic tool continue to remain a mystery.

Source: The Epoch Times | Comments (72)

Tags: Out of Place Artifacts

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #63 Posted by Rose-Red Howler on 17 July, 2014, 10:57
There's a few of these objects found to be millions of years old. I'm starting to wonder where did we come from or was someone here before us or is there going to be time travel?????
Comment icon #64 Posted by Harte on 17 July, 2014, 12:22
Carbon dating is one of the most evil and inaccurate technology mankind and science has ever come up with. There you go; i said it again! Oop parts are just simple proofs and this huge misbelieve...dinosaurs living 300 million years ago ? Wth? Yes, "Wth?" indeed. The first dinosaurs arose 230 million years ago. So, "Wth?" Harte
Comment icon #65 Posted by 95-Nasty on 17 July, 2014, 14:13
ever notice how everything that is interesting is also controversial? can't get a straight answer to anything. very frustrating. It's like, why read? whatever you find that is interesting, already has twenty authorities saying "FAKE"!! I completely agree with you, well said
Comment icon #66 Posted by stereologist on 17 July, 2014, 16:04
ever notice how everything that is interesting is also controversial? can't get a straight answer to anything. very frustrating. It's like, why read? whatever you find that is interesting, already has twenty authorities saying "FAKE"!! Even in science things are controversial. An example is the issue at CERN with the supraluminal, faster than light speed, neutrinos. The people at CERN are pretty smart and know that supraluminal claims come and go every few years. it took a while, but the problem was related to a bad connection of a cable. The supraluminal issue was controversial. That is the w... [More]
Comment icon #67 Posted by sargo on 17 August, 2014, 15:09
Due to natural processes forests are slowly converted to coal. Therefore, it is completely impossible that a wooden stick would look like the one in picture after 100 million years. Also the hammer does not fit the rock so well as it should and it seems that the stick has been broken to put it inside the rock.
Comment icon #68 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 18 August, 2014, 1:23
I'm a bigfoot fancier that thinks the creature exists, but I refuse to look at a phony film of a BF and say it is real to make myself happy. My eye is pretty good, and if the BF footage looks phony to me, I say it's phony. Very simple When I look at that hammer in the rock, it smells real to me. The sediment that left a yellow hue all around the hammer and rock, the broken handle that is embedded, it just looks real to me. If it could ever be proven to be real, then what? that is the real question. how to explain it.
Comment icon #69 Posted by stereologist on 18 August, 2014, 1:40
I'm a bigfoot fancier that thinks the creature exists, but I refuse to look at a phony film of a BF and say it is real to make myself happy. My eye is pretty good, and if the BF footage looks phony to me, I say it's phony. Very simple When I look at that hammer in the rock, it smells real to me. The sediment that left a yellow hue all around the hammer and rock, the broken handle that is embedded, it just looks real to me. If it could ever be proven to be real, then what? that is the real question. how to explain it. The hammer of course is real. It is a real hammer, but not an old one. It has... [More]
Comment icon #70 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 18 August, 2014, 1:55
The hammer of course is real. It is a real hammer, but not an old one. It has become encrusted with rock which can form in a short period of time. The problem here is that the creationist with it has assigned a date to the hammer that is not warranted. The hammer was found in an area with rock dated to something like 100Ma. The hammer was not found in a rock layer. It was found loose. It was found loose with some minerals encrusted on it. The date of the hammer cannot be assigned to the nearest rock. Button Bay in Vermont has been the site of many concretion finds. They are even on display in ... [More]
Comment icon #71 Posted by stereologist on 18 August, 2014, 2:29
Sure looks like the hammer was embedded into the rock to me. Maybe I should check my glasses? Now if someone faked that they did one hell of a job. Like I say the yellow hue is consistent throughout, rock or hammer. That is pretty hard to fake. The hammer was never imbedded in bedrock. The hammer is encrusted with minerals. It is covered by a concretion which can form in only a few years as evidenced by them forming on roots. Pieces of trash have been encrusted in a few years. It is not a matter of checking glasses, but realizing that the material on the hammer is recent. The fact that the col... [More]
Comment icon #72 Posted by Hanslune on 18 August, 2014, 2:30
A mining tool left in a limestone cave will be dripped on and covered with a concretion, rather common. Full report on that silly thing http://paleo.cc/paluxy/hammer.htm


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6166374
262549
174755

 
Work on lunar space station to begin in 2019
4-21-2018
NASA has revealed that its ambitious Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway will launch as early as 2022.
Cows could end up as world's largest mammals
4-21-2018
Scientists have warned that cows could eventually become the largest remaining mammals on Earth.
New species of 'exploding ant' discovered
4-20-2018
Capable of taking drastic action to protect their colonies, these ants have a rather unusual defense mechanism.
Missing Nazi submarine mystery finally solved
4-20-2018
The wreckage of one of Germany's most advanced U-boats has been discovered off the coast of Denmark.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Revealing the secrets of the deep ocean
Posted 4-19-2018 | 0 comments
Scientist Mandy Joye has dedicated her life to exploring the depths of the world's oceans.
 
Giant 3D-printed man
Posted 4-15-2018 | 2 comments
British YouTuber James Bruton has created a giant 3D-printed sculpture of himself.
 
The world's roundest object
Posted 4-12-2018 | 2 comments
A look at how the roundest object can help us to define the humble kilogram.
 
Do fish talk to each other ?
Posted 4-10-2018 | 11 comments
Fish might seem silent, but in actual fact they make a wide range of different sounds.
 
The great Jaffa Cake debate
Posted 4-8-2018 | 4 comments
Revisiting the age-old question - is the humble Jaffa Cake a cake or a biscuit ?
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Dreams and clues to the future
3-31-2018 | Philippines and Germany
 
Black cloaked figure
3-31-2018 | Carlisle, Cumbria, England
 
Three knocks
3-8-2018 | Canada
 
Two shadows of me
3-8-2018 | Bellflower, LA
 
I think I know what I saw
3-5-2018 | Near Sultan, Washington
 
Ghost, or something else ?
3-5-2018 | Ohio, USA
 
 
Black hole in Bismarck
2-14-2018 | Mandan
 
 
Trapped and chased
2-9-2018 | Saskatchewan canada
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2018
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ