Wednesday, April 30, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Nature & Environment > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All â–¾
Search Submit

Nature & Environment

Should chimps be granted human rights ?

By T.K. Randall
April 24, 2015 · Comment icon 49 comments

Should chimpanzees be considered people ? Image Credit: GFDL 1.2 Ikiwaner
A case is set to be brought to the New York State Supreme Court to argue that chimps are 'legal persons'.
For years animal rights activists have been attempting to put forward the notion that chimpanzees, which are often used as guinea pigs for medical experiments and drug testing, should be granted the same rights and privileges as human beings.

Now in response to a petition by the Nonhuman Rights Project a court order has been signed enabling the case of two research chimps named Hercules and Leo to be presented in the New York State Supreme Court next month.

The move had been initially celebrated as the first recognition of a chimpanzee as a legal person due to the inclusion of the writ of habeas corpus in the court order which is designed to protect human prisoners from unlawful detention.

Unfortunately however this reference was later removed by the judge.

"She crossed out writ of habeas corpus leaving us with an order to show cause," said Steven Wise, an attorney who has filed multiple lawsuits on the behalf of chimpanzees.
"The only entity that you can even issue an order to show cause for is a person. I think she would not have issued it if she thought there was no way chimpanzees could be considered persons."

At the hearing Wise will be attempting to argue the case for the chimpanzees to be released from the Stony Brook University research center so that they can live in a chimp sanctuary in Florida.

So far however a number of previous similar cases have failed to win success for the animals.

"To recognize personhood in nonhuman animals is to give them legal rights," said attorney Bob Kohn. "You cannot give any creature legal rights without those creatures having legal responsibility."

The hearing is set to take place in just over one month's time on May 27th.

Source: Live Science | Comments (49)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #40 Posted by xxxdemonxxx 10 years ago
What's next i wonder. Chimps being eligible for welfare? I can see it now...every chimp and gorilla in America, discovering the wondrous benefits of Obamacare.
Comment icon #41 Posted by Big Jim 10 years ago
Not human rights, but perhaps we need to codify how we treat animals. There seems to be much confusion in the law over classification of animals but less so in common understanding. Sometimes we let a snail or bird take precedence over human rights when their mere presence puts people out of work. Other times people are terribly cruel to animals with little consequence. Perhaps we should legislate levels of animals, with those we raise to eat in one category and others such as apes and dolphins and pets in another. Wild creatures in general in another and harmful animals in yet another classif... [More]
Comment icon #42 Posted by lightly 10 years ago
Sir Wearer of Hats, on 23 April 2015 - 11:50 PM, said: I've met dogs brighter than some humans. I've met plants. i don't get it I'd like to see all animal testing ended if it's possible.. but, human rights for chimps? could they sue us?
Comment icon #43 Posted by Starhunter 10 years ago
Not human rights, but perhaps we need to codify how we treat animals. There seems to be much confusion in the law over classification of animals but less so in common understanding. Sometimes we let a snail or bird take precedence over human rights when their mere presence puts people out of work. Other times people are terribly cruel to animals with little consequence. Perhaps we should legislate levels of animals, with those we raise to eat in one category and others such as apes and dolphins and pets in another. Wild creatures in general in another and harmful animals in yet another classif... [More]
Comment icon #44 Posted by GreenmansGod 10 years ago
Not human rights, but perhaps we need to codify how we treat animals. There seems to be much confusion in the law over classification of animals but less so in common understanding. Sometimes we let a snail or bird take precedence over human rights when their mere presence puts people out of work. Other times people are terribly cruel to animals with little consequence. Perhaps we should legislate levels of animals, with those we raise to eat in one category and others such as apes and dolphins and pets in another. Wild creatures in general in another and harmful animals in yet another classif... [More]
Comment icon #45 Posted by Zero Fox FK 10 years ago
I understand they are intelligent and all but 'Human' rights? Are they serious? What about Dolphins... surely they have human rights too.
Comment icon #46 Posted by Big Jim 10 years ago
Congress has yet to come to grips that women have human rights, I don't think the current congress could get past the greedy, holy book wavers who believe it is man's manifest destiny to ride roughshod over nature. So far laws that protect animals from cruelty are on a state by state basis. Also, what is harmful and what is not, can be subjective. A rancher sees wolves as harmful and a park ranger sees them as a necessary part of a balanced eco system. I think giving some kind of rights to animals who have been shown to be a certain level of sentients is about as far as we can hope to take it.... [More]
Comment icon #47 Posted by cyclopes500 10 years ago
If they pass this I see a lot of people being killed and injured once the Chimps and Gorillas have been let out of their cages and let loose in the welfare offices let alone on the streets.
Comment icon #48 Posted by Starhunter 10 years ago
Yes it is dangerous to take care of the Earth like we are gods. So far I haven't seen all that much care as much as there is damage from the notion we a gods of the Earth. It is not the Earth that is in danger it is us, because like dinosaurs we too can go extinct. The Earth will go on without us as it has for all the ages before we came along. As far as your last line goes, if I recall, Frank is a vegetarian. You would be surprised what a class in basic logic will do for your life in general, by the way. *anecdotal fallacy **no true scotsmen Thank you Spock.
Comment icon #49 Posted by FlyingAngel 10 years ago
Let's talk about mosquitos with human rights. Oh! We should "jail" and "feed" them instead of killing them !!


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles