Saturday, May 11, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > The UFO Phenomenon > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

The UFO Phenomenon

Officers recall Vietnam UFO encounters

By T.K. Randall
April 23, 2015 · Comment icon 944 comments

UFOs were reported by pilots during the Vietnam War. Image Credit: US Army
US military personnel reported several unusual incidents involving UFOs during the war in Vietnam.
One such encounter allegedly took place in 1968 when the crew of an American patrol boat came across two strange luminous objects in the sky over the zone dividing North and South Vietnam.

Roughly circular in shape, the objects were later seen again by a second patrol vessel whose crew witnessed them hovering above the first. A few moments later a sudden flash of light was observed and the boat was seen exploding in to a ball of flames. No further trace of the two objects was ever found.

Another source of UFO stories during the war in Vietnam was Capt. George Filer, an Air Force intelligence officer who was tasked with submitting daily reports to Gen. George S. Brown.
"You'd have an aircraft flying along, doing around 500 knots and a UFO comes alongside and does some barrel rolls around the aircraft and then flies off at three times the speed of one of the fastest jets we have in the Air Force," he said.

"So, obviously, it has a technology far in advance of anything we have."

Filer would later go on to collect and release details of UFO sightings from all over the world.

"People tell you a lot of things that they don't put in writing or sign their name to," he said. "There was always this part of UFOs that, if you got too interested, it could mess up your career."

Source: Huffington Post | Comments (944)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #935 Posted by Merc14 9 years ago
Good, because I want that person to confirm to everyone on this thread as to why temperature inversion cannot account for the UFOs in question, and I can tap Air Force radar operators as well if it comes to that. Seriously? F temeprature inversions and your other sidetracks, I want to know why you posted that radar scope image when we were discussing a scope from the 50's? Were you trying to fool us, mistaked a C&P or trying to make some point you forgot to make? Since you have avoided answering I am going for answer one. There is no way you couldn't know what you are looking at so waiting... [More]
Comment icon #936 Posted by ChrLzs 9 years ago
Seriously? F temeprature inversions and your other sidetracks, I want to know why you posted that radar scope image when we were discussing a scope from the 50's? Were you trying to fool us, mistaked a C&P or trying to make some point you forgot to make? Since you have avoided answering I am going for answer one. There is no way you couldn't know what you are looking at so waiting for an answer......... I'd REALLY like to see sky answer this IN DETAIL, as this is just one more in a looong series of misinformation attempts by him. Given that it would VERY OBVIOUSLY be misleading to suggest ... [More]
Comment icon #937 Posted by skyeagle409 9 years ago
No Sky, Merc is, try to keep up. And was the B-52 in the particular instance in which you are interested so equipped? And if it was, would it have been in use? Would it not just be used when one was dropping bombs? I don't think that I am getting through, and that is, the B-52 is equipped wiith a multi-purpose radar system and among its capabilities is the ability to map the terrain ground targets and then, photograph the area, before, and after a bombing run, not to forget the capability of the B-52 to detect and bomb targets through clouds with its onboard system.
Comment icon #938 Posted by skyeagle409 9 years ago
Seriously? F temeprature inversions and your other sidetracks, I want to know why you posted that radar scope image when we were discussing a scope from the 50's? Were you trying to fool us, mistaked a C&P or trying to make some point you forgot to make? Since you have avoided answering I am going for answer one. There is no way you couldn't know what you are looking at so waiting for an answer......... No, because reading comments, I had the impression that some folks think that only simple blips is recorded on radar, but I wanted to show that radar can see and do much more than that. It ... [More]
Comment icon #939 Posted by psyche101 9 years ago
Know it wasn't. The depiction of the object is definitely not plasma. Do you read any of the posts you answer?? Who said that case was described by plasma is what I said, and what is wrong with the link I offered??
Comment icon #940 Posted by psyche101 9 years ago
In a report's conclusion it said that It is certainly interesting to consider that this apparently non-aerodynamic aerial device has no comparison with all currently known technological developments. We can take a look here and notice that the return of the UFO is similar to the depiction in the picture drawn by the B-52 crewman who tried to look inside the UFO as they passed by the object.. Actural photo of the radar return of the UFO from the radar scope of the B-52. According to the report, the main body of the echo has a length in the order of 820 / 918 feet and a width in the order of 459... [More]
Comment icon #941 Posted by psyche101 9 years ago
Good, because I want that person to confirm to everyone on this thread as to why temperature inversion cannot account for the UFOs in question, and I can tap Air Force radar operators as well if it comes to that. You are not getting a lot of support there. I suggest you have a look at this:
Comment icon #942 Posted by psyche101 9 years ago
No, because reading comments, I had the impression that some folks think that only simple blips is recorded on radar, but I wanted to show that radar can see and do much more than that. You took far too much poetic license and ended up shooting yourself in the foot, Do not overreach your data sets Sky. You do that all the time. Stop trying to convolute issues, explain it like you are explaining it to a 5 year old. You can't go wrong then. It is very clear from the size and speed of the UFO (up to 3000 mph) that the object had nothing to do with AP or natural-occurring plasma, both of which wer... [More]
Comment icon #943 Posted by psyche101 9 years ago
That's what I'd like to know. The issue isn't about what radar is capable of in general, it's what the specific radar in question for each individual case is capable of. It's a strange argument that Sky is using, almost like a 'reverse strawman' or something. Same as Birdscan RADAR for JAL1628. Superfluous information to pad out the thread to hide any fact that might be eating away at a UFO tall tale.
Comment icon #944 Posted by Merc14 9 years ago
Because I wanted to make people aware of similar capabilities of the B-52. For an example, the B-52's radar has several modes of operation, amongst them, Indirect Bomb Damage Assessment Mode - an automated sequence of groundscan radar modes designed to map and photograph the target area during and after bomb release. Since you are a radar intercept officer, which I am very happy about, I wish for you to confirm what I have just posted above is true and do so for all to read. Why are you happy I was a RIO? Confirming what you said has absolutely nothing to do with the question at hand which is,... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles