Thursday, April 25, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Creatures, Myths & Legends > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Creatures, Myths & Legends

New 'Bigfoot' video recorded at Bluff Creek

By T.K. Randall
August 23, 2015 · Comment icon 61 comments

Does Bigfoot still lurk near Bluff Creek ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 anglerp1
Footage has emerged showing a dark figure crouching down next to a stream in a secluded forest.
Bluff Creek, a tributary of the Klamath River located 25 miles northwest of Orleans in California, was the site of the best known Bigfoot video of all time - the Patterson/Gimlin footage of 1967.

Now however a second video from the same area has emerged - a recording taken in 2008 by Bigfoot researcher M.K. Davis who maintains that he hadn't seen anything unusual at the time.
When he later analyzed his footage however he noticed that there seemed to be a figure sitting at the side of the creek playing around with some sort of white cloth. Upon closer inspection he noted that the figure appeared to be either covered in dark hair or was wearing very dark clothing.


"I was there with Don Monroe and Ken Iddins. Both men were accounted for in the video," he said. "We do not know who or what this is as no one else was there with us. It has a cloth of some sort."

Davis later uploaded an enhanced close-up video ( see below ) of the figure to help see it more clearly. While there is undoubtedly someone sitting next to the creek the figure looks more like an actual person, perhaps washing themselves in the water, than an unidentified species of hominid.

"I didn't see this live. I walked right by it. It just backed into the brush with only its knees showing and didn't move," he said. "I walked downstream and met my two friends coming upstream, so it was not them. I did some brightening on it and it does appear to be hair covered."



Source: Inquisitr.com | Comments (61)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #52 Posted by Cavan 9 years ago
I will say that far-fetched and silly applies to most bigfoot evidence. I still haven't seen any footage yet that can't be explained logically.But, as of the posting of this post, no evidence to this date and counting... Welcome to the forums if you haven't been welcomed yet. You'll find that most posters around here are sane and use common sense, some of those are pretty damned intelligent, both "skeptics" and "believers". Some "believers", you'll have to watch out for, those naive ones that are so close-minded they won't accept any questions, any request for proof, or any sort of sensible de... [More]
Comment icon #53 Posted by Thorvir Hrothgaard 9 years ago
I think bigfoot needs renamed to match all the other "bigfoot" videos. I'm shooting for Inconclusive-foot. I like that. Except for this one, it's conclusive: it's not bigfoot.
Comment icon #54 Posted by Aardvark-DK 9 years ago
In coming weeks, I will not shave, then go into forest, with towel, with coca-cola print, and take a selfie --- Very skinny ugly Bigfoot new new new, bigfoot captured on cam Ok I guess not...
Comment icon #55 Posted by freetoroam 9 years ago
In coming weeks, I will not shave, then go into forest, with towel, with coca-cola print, and take a selfie --- Very skinny ugly Bigfoot new new new, bigfoot captured on cam Ok I guess not... Do it Aardvark-DK, it can not possibly be any more ridiculous than what we have been shown so far.
Comment icon #56 Posted by woodsbooger 9 years ago
I hate how its always ten seconds of video then they pan away. I know if I ever saw an unknown creature in the woods I would run away crying like a baby. But I would think that someone who had the courage to start a video would have the nerve to continue, and keep going for more than eight seconds!
Comment icon #57 Posted by freetoroam 9 years ago
I hate how its always ten seconds of video then they pan away. I know if I ever saw an unknown creature in the woods I would run away crying like a baby. But I would think that someone who had the courage to start a video would have the nerve to continue, and keep going for more than eight seconds! Absolutely, we have questioned this before, but it does not get answered. I guess the answer is ... because it would debunk the story.
Comment icon #58 Posted by Atuke 9 years ago
Absolutely, we have questioned this before, but it does not get answered. I guess the answer is ... because it would debunk the story. Except on this particular video MK Davis was filming upstream while fellow Bigfoot researcher Don Monroe was downstream. Nobody else was in the area. MK was filming to get some perspective because there had been numerous wildfires in the area. This alleged Sasquatch wasn't seen until MK cleaned it up and he stumbled across the figure you see in this video. It was accidentally filmed
Comment icon #59 Posted by Atuke 8 years ago
Bigfoot uses a towel? LOL... Who says Sasquatch wouldn't use a towel? There are reports of them collecting trash for all sorts of Sasquatch reasons, hence so many reports along the highways. But I'm not seeing a towel btw. Anyway if you would study the PGF a little more in depth you would notice Patty is carrying a "medicine bag" or something of that ilk on her left side. A strap can clearly be seen around her neck with today's technology. These animals, as most suspect they are, are actually relic humanoids. And her clan appears to still be in the Klemath River basin. Perhaps this is one of t... [More]
Comment icon #60 Posted by Thorvir Hrothgaard 8 years ago
Who says Sasquatch wouldn't use a towel? There are reports of them collecting trash for all sorts of Sasquatch reasons, hence so many reports along the highways. But I'm not seeing a towel btw. Anyway if you would study the PGF a little more in depth you would notice Patty is carrying a "medicine bag" or something of that ilk on her left side. A strap can clearly be seen around her neck with today's technology. These animals, as most suspect they are, are actually relic humanoids. And her clan appears to still be in the Klemath River basin. Perhaps this is one of them. Use your imagination....... [More]
Comment icon #61 Posted by Cavan 8 years ago
Patty is carrying a "medicine bag" or something of that ilk on her left side. Comforting to know Patty's always there for me when I feel under the weather. Does she carry Calpol?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles