Thursday, May 1, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

Cis-lunar space station could replace ISS

By T.K. Randall
November 5, 2016 · Comment icon 19 comments

In the future, astronauts could be living and working in lunar orbit. Image Credit: NASA
There are plans to build an ambitious new space station around the Moon within the next two decades.
The International Space Station, which began construction all the way back in 1998, has proven to be both an invaluable scientific asset and an important reminder of what can be achieved when various nations work together in peaceful co-operation towards a common goal.

While there are plans in place to keep the ISS going well in to the 2020s, experts from around the world are already contemplating its successor - a space station in orbit around the Moon.

At a closed-door meeting in Houston last week, officials from NASA and other space agencies met up to discuss the latest ideas and changes to the cis-lunar space station concept.
The current plan would be for the station to be a multi-modular outpost, similar to the ISS, with each section placed in to lunar orbit using NASA's upcoming Space Launch System.

The technologies used in the new station, including a closed-loop life-support system and electric propulsion, would be a lot more advanced than anything seen on the ISS.

While nothing is set in stone at the moment, the ideas being put forward indicate that the Moon will play a key role in the future of manned spaceflight after the ISS is eventually discontinued.

It is also likely to play an important role in future manned missions to Mars as well.

Source: The Planetary Society | Comments (19)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by geraldnewfie 9 years ago
if we built a base on the moon it would be smarter, less danger of debris hitting it, if something happens they have a place to run and maybe..maybe survive, also we can mine there and see if we come up with a new metal, use the ground to cover the base so it can reduce radiation from the sun, we could bring up 3d printers and design stuff to test in low gravity and on the surface on the moon, but i think the real reason they dont want a base because with the space station they can falsify pictures, with men on the moon its kinda hard
Comment icon #11 Posted by schizoid78 9 years ago
Yep why not on the moon... At least there are an advantage to build it around the moon, space garbage up there is probably null (or near null)! S
Comment icon #12 Posted by Parsec 9 years ago
@Waspie_Dwarf I was just wondering why China wasn't part of the group, I didn't know about the ban, thank you for the info Waspie!  It would be important to have them on board as well, both economically and to tighten the relationship.    I understand the security concerns (although they have no problems sharing with Russia, that's interesting to me), but owning China $1.2 trillions of US debt, if they'd agree, in exchange for sharing knowledge they could divert part of that money to space related projects, increasing NASA fundings and reducing the US debt in one move.    So this project ... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by highdesert50 9 years ago
I could imagine that an orbiting lunar space station would present itself as a potential model for similar endeavors, perhaps even Mars. The use of Lagrangian points might be explored too for application as low energy launching platforms.
Comment icon #14 Posted by Nick Rock 9 years ago
    Yet excellent points well made in your post too. And I also think that certainly reaffirms your earlier point about "Whether a lunar base or a cis-lunar base are best depends entirely on the purpose of the base." Indeed. It's easy to see a much more appealing advantage of the cis-luner base pros verses the underground base cons.  
Comment icon #15 Posted by Eye of Giza 9 years ago
they spend so much money trying to get to mars and other places yet cant even get man back on the moon, i wonder why. How long was it now that man supposidly set foot on the moon. Wouldnt you think they would try to go there again or is there something stopping them. Even when you see google earth with all its technology zooming down onto the cities its amazing, yet when you look at the moon is it as detailed. Can we see old abandoned space craft. correct me if i am wrong please
Comment icon #16 Posted by cyclopes500 9 years ago
What sort of orbit will it be in. Equatorial I presume. The problem is a lot of the good stuff like ice is at the poles. Or so I understand.
Comment icon #17 Posted by Astra. 9 years ago
And how sad would it be - if man stopped moving forward with space exploration ? Consider this - what would be the cost if we "didn't "continue with ongoing discovery so we can gain more knowledge and evolve ?      I think the data concerning the moon has probably been exhaustively analysed anyway. We now know a lot about the moon... and returning back there is probably unlikely as we've been there so many times before.  
Comment icon #18 Posted by Astra. 9 years ago
Have you seen this ie; links below. http://www.space.com/12835-nasa-apollo-moon-landing-sites-photos-lro.html http://history.nasa.gov/humanartifacts.html It could be that the images on the moon aren't as clear or as detailed as what we see on google earth... because the moon is much farther away ? ...that's my guess anyway. Maybe somebody like ChrLzs (who knows much about photography and the moon) or Waspie could answer your question in more detail.
Comment icon #19 Posted by ChrLzs 9 years ago
Please do not repeat that ridiculous claim here - there are threads here that comprehensively deal with both the ludicrous claim that we faked the moon landings, and also why we went, and why we haven't don't any more piloted missions yet.  If you are concerned about the money being spent given what we now know about the moon, why would we spend more money putting humans up there?  Do you not understand why we went, and why now we instead want to get people onto a planet with many more potential benefits? You are wrong.  And really, before making claims like these, you should research th... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles