Friday, May 15, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

NASA cancels lunar space station in favor of more ambitious plan

By T.K. Randall
March 25, 2026 · Comment icon 14 comments
Moon colony
Image: Moon Colony
Credit: (PD) NASA/SAIC/Pat Rawlings
The long-awaited 'Lunar Gateway' space station has been scrapped but will be repurposed for something else.
With the first manned mission around the Moon (Artemis II) still on schedule for a launch on April 1st, it seems that NASA has been thinking long and hard about the future of lunar exploration.

While there had been plans to place a permanent orbital outpost around the Moon to act as a stepping stone for future manned missions to the lunar surface, new NASA administrator Jared Isaacman has now revealed that this won't actually be going ahead as planned.

Instead, the space agency will work to set up a base on the Moon's surface, a process that will take around seven years and will re-use some of the Lunar Gateway's already completed components.
"It should not really surprise anyone that we are pausing Gateway in its current form and focusing on infrastructure that supports sustained operations on the lunar surface," Isaacman told attendees at a recent event at NASA's headquarters in Washington DC.

"Despite some of the very real hardware and schedule challenges, we can repurpose equipment and international partner commitments to support surface and other program objectives."

As things stand, it isn't clear exactly what these changes will mean for the manned space program moving forward, especially given that Lunar Gateway had aimed to enable easier access to the Moon's surface - perhaps the most important thing needed to build a base there.

Which vehicles will be used to transport astronauts to and from the base also remains unclear.

Source: The Guardian | Comments (14)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by fred_mc 2 months ago
A moonbase is definitely cooler than a space station around the moon. We don't have much research about low-gravity impact on the human body either (space stations have zero g, not low g) so that is interesting as well.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Ell 2 months ago
 
Comment icon #7 Posted by DieChecker 2 months ago
I was looking forward to that space station. 
Comment icon #8 Posted by Hazzard 1 month ago
NASA didnt stop moon missions because the military "took over"... Apollo ended mainly due to cost, politics, and shifting priorities, not secrecy.  
Comment icon #9 Posted by tmcom 1 month ago
Yeah they could put thrusters on the one around the Earth and push it into the Moons orbit, have to be slow since it isn't designed for space travel. Then build the one in 2001 for earth instead, (look way cooler than the Lego slop job).
Comment icon #10 Posted by Ove 1 month ago
If you had something like the the International Space Station (ISS) on the surfaces of the Moon. Humans could of course be there, just like they can be inside the International Space Station (ISS) in Earth's orbit. Or maybe a little more protection would be needed on the Moon ?
Comment icon #11 Posted by Hazzard 1 month ago
  Yes - you could absolutely live on the Moon in a similar way to the International Space Station, but it would need far more protection than in Earth orbit. On the Moon you have no magnetic field or atmosphere, so radiation, temperature extremes, and micrometeorites are all much harsher. That means a simple pressurised habitat is not enough - you would need heavy shielding, likely regolith cover or even underground construction. So same basic idea as the ISS, just in a far more hostile environment that demands much stronger protection.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Ell 1 month ago
The Moon will block half of the cosmic radiation and half of the meteorites. More if they dig in. I would not send humans to the Moon, though. Sending robots is a lot safer.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Hazzard 1 month ago
  The Moon does not "block half" of cosmic radiation or meteorites. It blocks only the part of the sky it physically covers, so you still get hit from all directions, including secondary particles generated in the surface itself. Meteorites are also not meaningfully reduced unless you are (like you said) underground... or heavily shielded by structure.    But I agree with the second part more than the first. Robots are definitely safer and will always do the early heavy lifting on the Moon, especially for mapping, construction prep, and testing systems. But humans are still the only ones wh... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Ove 1 month ago
I guess China will do that. But dress them up in astronaut suits to make us believe they made it to the Moon’s surface  Yes, maybe a underground International Space Station (ISS) on the Moon would be safe ?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles