Wednesday, January 22, 2020
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help    |   Cookie Policy    |   Privacy Policy    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

NASA is planning to 'go to the Moon to stay'

Posted on Saturday, 9 February, 2019 | Comment icon 12 comments

NASA is going back to the Moon. Image Credit: NASA/SAIC/Pat Rawlings
The space agency is currently seeking partners to develop reusable lunar landing vehicles.
As the 50th anniversary of the first manned moon landing draws closer, NASA is looking to not only repeat its 1969 success but to take things one step further by sending astronauts to the moon on a more permanent basis.

To this end, administrator Jim Bridenstine has called on American firms to develop "reusable systems for astronauts to land on the moon" with the goal of returning there within the next ten years.

"As a lifelong NASA supporter, I am thrilled to be talking once again about landing humans on the moon," he wrote. "But to some, saying we're returning to the moon implies we'll be doing the same as we did 50 years ago. I want to be clear - that is not our vision."
"We are going to the moon with innovative new technologies and systems to explore more locations across the surface than we ever thought possible. This time, when we go to the moon, we will stay."

Things are due to get underway next week when industry partners meet up at NASA headquarters to discuss the technology needed to establish "a sustainable, human presence beyond Earth's orbit".

"That starts with the Gateway - a lunar orbiting outpost designed to ensure the safe transit of astronauts to the lunar surface and back home again," said Bridenstine.

"Billions of people around the world will watch history being made as astronauts explore more of the surface for longer periods of time than ever before, and help us prepare for missions to Mars and other destinations."

Source: Sky News | Comments (12)

Tags: Moon, NASA

Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #3 Posted by eddword on 9 February, 2019, 16:54
I can't understand why we are not inhabiting the moon today. All the talk and focus is on going to Mars. Which in comparison to going to the moon is an expensive and monumental task. Lets face it, the Moon is a lot easier and quicker to get to. In my opinion, All the tech, materials and manpower used to establish the ISS could have been better used for a Moon Base. And probably with same amount of time and money and effort. I think that there could have been hundreds of People living on he moon today and possibly some kind of industry. That is, If the space program hadn't fallen backwards. Now... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by EBE Hybrid on 9 February, 2019, 20:38
It's a shame that this hasn't happened sooner. The concepts of reusable vehicles and a gateway were introduced to the cinematic audience by Stanley Kubrick in 2001 (released before we even set foot on the moon), and let's face it the level of technology theorized was at perhaps a 1980's level!
Comment icon #5 Posted by paperdyer on 10 February, 2019, 0:36
It's going to be interesting.  Since the military isn't allowed to set up shop on the Moon, I'm sure we will be accused of spying whether we will  or not.  But this is way over due.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Seti42 on 10 February, 2019, 1:21
TBH, I don't see this happening. The vast majority of the population wants the government and scientists/engineers to work on fixing all the problems here first. Climate change. Health care. Education. Crime. Homelessness. Living wages. Infrastructure repair and maintenance. Religious extremism. All these and more need to be addressed ASAP. That said, I do love the idea of space exploration...I just think sending robots, not people, is the way to do it.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Nzo on 10 February, 2019, 19:49
That is great news if its true and actually happens. It is long long overdue that we have a moon base. Personally I would love to see one that is underground and can be expanded to house and be self sufficient for at least a thousand people. Why build a space station when we have one orbiting us? Half the work is already done. And no orbit decay.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Mystify on 11 February, 2019, 16:06
Sounds like another slow drip admittance of partial truths. Lunar bases have been there for a while already. Admitting they're putting them there now is just to cover up what they already did in secrecy.
Comment icon #9 Posted by tmcom on 13 February, 2019, 2:28
Yep, NASA and lying through its teeth go hand in hand, so if they say that Mars is a dead rock, with virtually no atmosphere, then more serious study is necesscary.
Comment icon #10 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 13 February, 2019, 4:11
Yes because NASA could keep it a secret because no one else has ever sent a spacecraft there. Well no one except the  Russians... and the Europeans... oh, and India. But apart from that no one else would know... except the ground based astronomers and their ever more sophisticated instruments. Oh, and some of the many amateurs form around the world and THEIR, ever more sophisticated instruments So NASA could lie and get away with it as long as just about every non-NASA affiliated astronomer and planetary scientist in the world was also prepared to lie which, as anyone capable of logic would re... [More]
Comment icon #11 Posted by tmcom on 13 February, 2019, 11:47
Other countries do give us valid information, that is very different to typical NASA data. And that is available if enough digging is done, and someone has an open mind. l have only scoured through 1/4 of all Curiosity images to date, so...... And l agree a kid with a $100 telescope can point it at Mars, (at closest approach) and see what the real deal is, not the toned down, (for want of a better word) data NASA feeds to the masses.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Robotic Jew on 15 February, 2019, 15:01
Where do I sign up?

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:


'Dancing dragon' fossil is velociraptor relative
Palaeontologists have compared the feathers of a 120 million-year-old dinosaur to those of modern birds.
Ohio town sees mystery flashes, vibrations
Recently released footage shows the moment the skies over Bethel, Ohio suddenly lit up in multiple colors.
US and UK sign new treaty to protect Titanic
Access to the wreck of the world-famous vessel, which sank in 1912, has long remained a point of contention.
Are UFOs piloted by humans from the future ?
Is it possible that unidentified flying objects are piloted, not by aliens, but by our own future descendants ?
Stories & Experiences
Dog and Jamaican statue
1-10-2020 | Canada
Life changing experience
12-19-2019 | Australia
Unexplained smoke or fog
12-19-2019 | West Texas, USA
He came in the night
12-19-2019 | CA
My reptilian encounter
11-24-2019 | Ireland and Australia
The day I found out I am immortal
11-24-2019 | Hialeah
Recent activity in my home
11-24-2019 | Kansas City, MO USA
The houndsman
10-26-2019 | Michigan, USA
Birthday balloon
10-26-2019 | Usa

         More stories | Send us your story
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Why do we believe in conspiracies ?
Posted 1-17-2020 | 4 comments
A look at how the human race has effectively evolved to accept conspiracy theories.
NASA 2020: Are you ready ?
Posted 1-1-2020 | 3 comments
A look at what's coming up in the world of spaceflight this year.
Is it possible to levitate a human ?
Posted 12-15-2019 | 2 comments
Science enthusiast Rick Edwards attempts to unlock the secret of levitation.
What is the biocentric universe theory ?
Posted 12-6-2019 | 38 comments
TheoryInk takes a look at the concepts behind the idea of a biocentric universe.
Interview with Sophia the robot
Posted 11-21-2019 | 18 comments
The popular robot recently made an appearance on 'This Morning' in the UK.
 View: More videos
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.712 (c) 2001-2020
Terms   |   Privacy Policy   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ