Wednesday, May 25, 2022
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
You are viewing: Home > News > Conspiracy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  

Did you know that you can now support us on Patreon ?

You can subscribe for less than the cost of a cup of coffee - and we'll even throw in a range of exclusive perks as a way to say thank you.
Conspiracy

Did the CIA invent the term 'conspiracy theory' ?

March 18, 2020 | Comment icon 58 comments



Was the term invented to play down JFK assassination theories ? Image Credit: PD
Is the idea that the CIA first came up with the term 'conspiracy theory', itself a conspiracy theory?
Writing in 'The Conversation', Michael Butter - a professor of American Literary and Cultural History at the University of Tubingen, Germany - explores the origins of the term 'conspiracy theory'.



Conspiracy theories have a long history, but the actual term "conspiracy theory" emerged much more recently. It was only a few decades ago that the term took on the derogatory connotations it has today, where to call someone a conspiracy theorist functions as an insult.

So it may come as no surprise that there is even a conspiracy theory about the origins of the label. This conspiracy theory claims that the CIA invented the term in 1967 to disqualify those who questioned the official version of John F Kennedy's assassination and doubted that his killer, Lee Harvey Oswald, had acted alone.

There are even two versions of this conspiracy theory. The more extreme version claims that the CIA literally invented the term in the sense that the words "conspiracy" and "theory" had never been used before in combination. A more moderate version acknowledges that the term existed before, but claims that the CIA intentionally created its negative connotations and so turned the label into a tool of political propaganda.

The more moderate version has been particularly popular in recent years for two reasons. First, it is very easy to disprove the more extreme claim that the CIA actually invented the term. As a search on Google Books quickly reveals, the term "conspiracy theory" emerged around 1870 and began to be more frequently used during the 1950s. Even die-hard conspiracy theorists have a hard time trying to ignore this. Second, the more moderate version received a big boost in popularity a few years ago when American political scientist Lance DeHaven-Smith propagated it in a book published by a renowned university press.

Smoking gun

Although they make differing claims about the origin and development of the term, the proponents of both versions invariably point to an official CIA document called Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report as their smoking gun. It was released in 1976 after The New York Times requested it under the Freedom of Information Act.

The document expresses concern about the considerable number of people who doubted the official investigation into Kennedy's murder, the Warren Commission, which found that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. It also aims to equip CIA contacts with arguments against those who challenge the findings and the official version of the event. For example, it emphasises that nobody in their right mind would have chosen someone as unstable as Oswald as a pawn in a larger plot. And it points out the logical fallacies of these alternative accounts.

One may find the CIA's attempt to influence public opinion problematic. But there is not a single sentence in the document that indicates the CIA intended to weaponise, let alone introduce the term "conspiracy theory" to disqualify criticism. In fact, "conspiracy theory" in the singular is never used in the document. "Conspiracy theories" in the plural is only used once, matter-of-factly in the third paragraph:

Conspiracy theories have frequently thrown suspicion on our organisation, for example, by falsely alleging that Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us.
The authors of the document deploy the term in a very casual manner and obviously do not feel the need to define it. This indicates that it was not a new term but already widely used at the time to describe alternative accounts. At no time do the authors recommend using the label "conspiracy theory" to stigmatise alternative explanations of Kennedy's assassination. This suggests that the term had not yet acquired the same level of negativity it possesses today.

Why people believe it

The far more interesting issue, for me, is why this conspiracy theory emerged and why so many people believe in it. No scholar has yet fully charted the course of this particular theory, so it's hard to pinpoint exactly when it emerged. But it is safe to assume that it was during the 1980s or 1990s based on cursory investigations.

It was only in the 1980s that the term "conspiracy theory" began to really have the negative connotations we associate with it today. So the conspiracy theory about the term's origins was likely a reaction to this growing negativity.

The reason why so many people believe in the idea that the CIA invented the term "conspiracy theory" relates to the role of the Kennedy assassination in the larger history of the concept and their popularity. It may seem that we are living in an age of conspiracy theory, but such theories were even more popular in the past.

From at least the 17th century to the 1950s, conspiracy theories were a widely accepted way of understanding the world and often the official versions of events. They were articulated by elites and usually targeted external enemies or subversives who were allegedly trying to undermine the state. It was only during the late 1950s and early 1960s that conspiracy theories started to become a stigmatised way of explaining big events.

One side-effect of this move from the mainstream to the margins of society was that conspiracy theories started to primarily target societal and political elites. They are no longer concerned with alleged plots against the state but with those orchestrated by the state.

Another side-effect of this new stigma was that the label conspiracy theory or theorist became a pejorative term. The Kennedy assassination was the first major instance in which conspiracy theorists accused the state of secretly plotting evil and provided alternative accounts that were then labelled conspiracy theories, as in the 1967 CIA document. So it is hardly surprising that conspiracy theorists - who blame events on the intentional actions of evil people - retrospectively see the emergence of the term as a deliberate attempt to uphold the official version of the Kennedy assassination.

Michael Butter, Professor of American Literary and Cultural History, University of Tubingen

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article.The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (58)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #49 Posted by ian hacktorp 1 year ago
Actually, it's testimony.  Under oath.  By a former CIA director, Director of National Intelligence, and high-ranking military official. Details, details.. 
Comment icon #50 Posted by rashore 1 year ago
If it was testimony under oath.. what court was this in, what's the docket number? And if it is testimony under oath, than it wasn't an interrogation like the video and you claimed. Interrogations and testimonies under oath are two different things and parts of the legal process. 
Comment icon #51 Posted by ian hacktorp 1 year ago
Lying to federal investigators is a crime, and agreeing to be interrogated by federal investigators carries with it an obligation to tell the truth...along with penalties for failing to do so. It is also considered "testimony"...courts and docket number (or bible) not required.
Comment icon #52 Posted by rashore 1 year ago
Ok, so you got court nothing. Ok.. so how does your information pertain to the OP topic?
Comment icon #53 Posted by ian hacktorp 1 year ago
I'm sorry to have thrown cold water on your semantical argument...it's just that it held no water of its own. Anyway, we have a former high-ranking CIA official discussing conspiracies within the US government. Seems pretty relevant...unless one is trying hard to ignore it.
Comment icon #54 Posted by rashore 1 year ago
You got a video of an audio of some guys talking without verification of who they are with video clips that aren't part of the audio. Presented on a shifty off-brand Youtube sort of website. What you are presenting is a CT. 
Comment icon #55 Posted by ian hacktorp 1 year ago
Indeed.  Good thing this is the Conspiracies forum.
Comment icon #56 Posted by rashore 1 year ago
Glad you are aware that you posted a classic example of a CT, and not something factual. Rather round about way of you do demonstrate the example there.  Now then, let's get back to the OP topic of the coining of the term conspiracy theory and cease straying off topic with random examples of CT's. 
Comment icon #57 Posted by MyOtherAccount 8 months ago
https://www.etymonline.com/word/conspiracy: Conspiracy theory "explanation of an event or situation involving unwarranted belief that it is caused by a conspiracy among powerful forces" emerged in mid-20c. (by 1937) and figures in the writings of, or about, Charles Beard, Hofstadter, Veblen, etc., but the degree of paranoia and unreasonableness implied in each use is not always easy to discern. The phrase was used from 19c. in a non-pejorative sense "the theory that a (certain) conspiracy exists," especially in court cases. Its use in general reference to theories of hidden cabals pulling wire... [More]
Comment icon #58 Posted by lightly 8 months ago
 People conspire.  (Conspire 1. to plan secretly.).  People theorize about conspiracys  (Theorize 1. To formulate or analyze theories.  2. To speculate.).     Some theories about conspiracies are fairly accurate understandings,  and some aren't.    


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


 Total Posts: 7,267,586    Topics: 298,928    Members: 197,020

 Not a member yet ? Click here to join - registration is free and only takes a moment!
Recent news and articles