AI-generated footage showing Bigfoot vlogging about its day has been showing up everywhere recently.
Bigfoot seems to have become something of an Internet celebrity over the last few weeks thanks to a new AI video generation tool enabling just about anyone to create vlog-style clips.
The videos, which are actually quite impressive visually, show one or more Bigfoot-type creatures getting up to their daily activities in the woods while talking directly to the camera.
(Yes, apparently Bigfoot speaks perfect English and has an American accent).
What's particularly remarkable is how easy it is to produce videos like this - Google's Veo 3 video generator can create entire videos based on little more than textual input from the user.
That said, subscriptions to the service are not exactly cheap.
If you haven't seen any of the AI Bigfoot vlogs before, you can check one out below.
While stuff like this tends to be harmless enough, the problem arises when people use AI to create videos that look authentic - especially of Bigfoot or other cryptozoological creatures.
No doubt it will become harder than ever to determine what's real and what isn't over the coming years.
But it still hasn't been satisfactorily debunked. All the naysayers and anti-hoaxers still can't explain it. Chris Packham's attempted debunk looked like what it was-a man in a suit. Bob Hieronymus was so full of **** he couldn't fit in the suit, and numerous others have wibbled on about zippers and babies and made themselves look like loonies. I don't know if it's real or not. But it hasn't been debunked, so yes, you could say, it IS the gold standard.
I will add that I've never seen another piece of bigfoot film that ever made the hairs on the back of my neck prickle like Patty does-there is something eerie about that film.
H's deions of the suit don't match either patty or morris's suits. And of course friends and family corroborate him. Skeptics like to latch on to stories like this at face value because it feeds into their confirmation bias. I've yet to see anyone seriously tackle the arm length issue.
No, because it doesn't take the issue of patty's apparent proportions vs. apparent motions into account. https://www.woodape.org/index.php/thoughts-on-the-pg-footage/ IE, the arms are bending in the wrong place to be extensions, or at least simple extensions of the sort BH (or BS rather) claims were used.
Please Login or Register to post a comment.