Friday, April 19, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Extraterrestrial > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit


Possible hints of alien life found on K2-18b - how excited should we be ?

By T.K. Randall
September 18, 2023 · Comment icon 14 comments

An artist's impression of K2-18b. Image Credit: NASA
The James Webb Space Telescope's latest discovery is significant, but have we really found life on an alien world ?
Data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has shown that an exoplanet around a star in the constellation Leo has some of the chemical markers that, on Earth, are associated with living organisms. But these are vague indications. So how likely is it that this exoplanet harbours alien life?

Exoplanets are worlds that orbit stars other than the Sun. The planet in question is named K2-18b. It's so named because it was the first planet found to orbit the red dwarf star K2-18. There is a K2-18c as well - the second planet to be discovered. The star itself is dimmer and cooler than the Sun, meaning that, to get the same level of light as we do on Earth, the planet would need to be much closer to its star than we are.

The system is roughly 124 light years away, which is close in astronomical terms. So what are conditions like on this exoplanet? This is a difficult question to answer. We have telescopes and techniques powerful enough to tell us what the star is like, and how far away the exoplanet is, but we can't capture direct images of the planet. We can work out a few basics, however.

Working out how much light hits K2-18b is important for assessing the planet's potential for life. K2-18b orbits closer to its star than Earth does: it's at roughly 16% of the distance from Earth to the Sun. Another measurement we need is the star's power output: the total amount of energy it radiates per second. K2-18's power output is 2.3% that of the Sun.

Using geometry, we can work out that K2-18b receives about 1.22 kilowatts (kW) in solar power per square metre. This is similar to the 1.36 kW of incoming light we receive on Earth. Although there's less energy coming from K2-18, it evens out because the planet is closer. So far, so good. However, the incoming light calculation doesn't take into account clouds or how reflective the planet's surface is.

When we consider life on other planets, a popular term to use is the habitable zone, which means that at an average surface temperature, water will be in a liquid state - as this condition is considered essential for life. In 2019, the Hubble Space Telescope determined that K2-18b showed signs of water vapour, suggesting that liquid water would be present on the surface. It is currently thought that there are large oceans on the planet.

This caused a ripple of excitement at the time, but without further evidence it was just an interesting result. Now we have reports that JWST has identified carbon dioxide, methane and - possibly - the compound dimethyl sulfide (DMS) in the atmosphere. The tentative detection of DMS is significant because it is only produced on Earth by algae. We currently know of no way it can be naturally produced without a life-form.

Is there life on K2-18b?

All these indications seem to suggest that K2-18b might be the place to go to find alien life. It is not quite as simple as that, though, as we have no idea how accurate the results are. The method used to determine what is in the atmosphere of an exoplanet involves light from a different source (usually a star or galaxy) passing through the edge of the atmosphere that is then observed by us. Any chemical compounds will absorb light in specific wavelengths which can then be identified.

Imagine it as looking at a light bulb through a glass tumbler. You can see through it perfectly when empty. If you fill it with water, you can still see through pretty well, but there are some optical effects and colouration, which are the equivalent of hydrogen and dust clouds in space. Now imagine you poured in red food dye - this might be the equivalent of the main chemical constituent in a planet's atmosphere.
But most atmospheres are made up of many chemicals. The equivalent of looking for any one of them would be like pouring 50 - likely many more - coloured food dyes, in different amounts, into your tumbler and trying to identify how much of one particular colour is present. It is an incredibly difficult task with plenty of room for subjective assessment and errors. In addition, the light going through the atmosphere contains a signal of the star's chemical constituents - further complicating the analysis.

Only a few years ago there was a surge of interest in whether life existed on Venus, as observations had indicated the presence of phosphine gas, which can be produced by microbes.

However, this finding was later successfully refuted by several studies. If there can be confusion about what is in the atmosphere of a planet that's just next door, in astronomical terms, it's easy to see why analysing a planet that's many times further away is a difficult task.

What can we take from this?

The chances of life on exoplanet K2-18b are low but not impossible. These results will likely not change anybody's opinions or beliefs about extraterrestrial life. Instead, they do demonstrate the advancing ability to look into worlds that are not our own and find more information.

The power of JWST is not only in producing incredible pictures, but in providing more detailed and accurate data on celestial objects themselves. Knowing which exoplanets host water and which do not could provide information on how the Earth formed.

Studying the atmospheres of gas giant exoplanets can inform the study of similar worlds in the Solar System, such as Jupiter and Saturn. And identifying levels of CO2 indicates how an extreme greenhouse effect might affect a planet. This is the real power of studying the composition of planetary atmospheres.

Ian Whittaker, Senior Lecturer in Physics, Nottingham Trent University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Comments (14)

Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #5 Posted by NCC1701 7 months ago
I love the smell of dimethyl sulphide when walking along the beach.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Hankenhunter 7 months ago
Dimethyl sulphide? So they detected farts? No, that was you. Ease off on the Mexican food.
Comment icon #7 Posted by rjos 7 months ago
I'd love to know how they can identify a molecule from 120 Light years away.
Comment icon #8 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 7 months ago
Amazingly the same way it is identified on Earth, spectroscopy. Each molecule absorbs or emits light in a series of distinct wavelengths. It is as unique to each molecule as a fingerprint is to a person. When light from a star shines through a planet's atmosphere molecules in the atmosphere absorb the light in these distinct wavelengths. By taking a spectrum of the star, and a spectrum of the star light passing through the planetary atmosphere it is possible to deduct one from the other and deduce which molecules are present in the atmosphere. 
Comment icon #9 Posted by josellama2000 7 months ago
Now they cant detect that guy that loves tacos from far away in wherever planet he is...  
Comment icon #10 Posted by Roshman 7 months ago
Life could have arrived on Earth from elsewhere.
Comment icon #11 Posted by Cho Jinn 7 months ago
No it could not have.  There is no flying saucer in my driveway, ergo, there are no aliens anywhere and none have ever visited Earth at any time. The absence of evidence is evidence of absence!  Iä! Richard Dawkins!  #skepticism
Comment icon #12 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 7 months ago
Wow, what an incredibly ignorant post on so many levels. It shows a total lack of knowledge (or an inability to understand) all of the following: Scientific method Basic logic The panspermia hypothesis Simple English comprehension No one mentioned flying saucers and so your comment constitutes a straw man argument, and so can be dismissed outright as a logical fallacy.   The actual quote is: So we either have a colossal failure to understand a very simple concept or an out and out attempt at dishonesty: ... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by Cho Jinn 7 months ago
You forgot the paean to Shub Niggurath.  I agree with you, my comment was just satirical, and humor (sp.) is rather subjective.
Comment icon #14 Posted by josellama2000 7 months ago
exactly, using panspermia as an argument, without explaining how life appears outside earth, is a fallacy similar to the Zeno's paradox, like Achilles and the tower of tortoises.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News


Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon


For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles