Thursday, July 18, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

Scientists are trying to crack the mystery of the Singapore Stone

June 11, 2024 · Comment icon 3 comments
The Singapore Stone.
Nobody knows what this inscription reads. Image Credit: CC-BY-2.0 Jon Callas
This undecipherable inscription written in an unknown language and writing system has puzzled experts for centuries.
Francesco Perono Cacciafoco: If you pay a visit to the Singapore Stone, displayed at the National Museum of Singapore, you might be disappointed. That's because the inscription - carrying an unknown writing system transcribing an unknown language - is fading. But if you love puzzles, this won't put you off.

The stone is a fragment of a bigger slab, once welcoming visitors at the mouth of the Singapore River. The British blew it up in 1843, to build a fort. Discovered in 1819, the stone was almost entirely lost. Scottish military officer Lieutenant-Colonel James Low, amid general indifference, was able to save three fragments. He sent them to the Royal Asiatic Society's Museum in Calcutta to be studied.

They arrived in 1848. Meanwhile, other parts of the stone disappeared in the island. In 1918, the Raffles Museum of Singapore asked Calcutta to return the fragments. Only one was sent back. Nothing is known about the others, which are possibly lost forever. Despite its name, this sandstone slab is not a simple "stone". It was once part of a monument, an ancient epigraph measuring three-by-three metres and carrying about 50 lines of text.

Many epigraphs didn't survive the insults of time. Archaeological relics are often lost, over centuries. It's sad, yet unavoidable. But the Singapore Stone was not just another epigraph. The writing system on its surface is unique, never found anywhere else and never used in any other text. And it remains undeciphered.

Not being able to understand the text of the epigraph, we cannot postulate a specific time frame for its origin. Hypotheses range from the 10th to the 13th century, but there is no consensus. Was the epigraph connected with the Majapahit empire? Or a gift by a rajah from south-eastern India, celebrating the deeds of the local legendary hero Badang? No one will know until we're able to read it.

The script is one of the major puzzles in language deciphering of our times. It's a conundrum in crypto and historical linguistics with apparently no solution. The challenge can be compared to the mysteries of better-known undeciphered writing systems, like Linear A and the Rongorongo script.

Despite the almost complete loss of the rest of the slab, the existing fragment and reproductions of missing parts of the full monument provide us with elements to investigate. Before being blown up, the monument was hand drawn in 1837 by the politician William Bland and philologist James Prinsep. Even Sir Stamford Raffles, the British East Indian administrator and founder of Singapore, worked on it, trying to understand its text. After its destruction, the three recovered fragments were graphically reproduced, before being sent to India.
A general, unwritten rule of crypto linguistics states that the more text we have - for comparisons, frequency analyses and pattern recognition - the higher our chances of deciphering it. The opposite situation leads to failure. The Singapore Stone is no exception. Its unknown writing system transcribing an unknown language represents every glyph breaker's nightmare - a seal of indecipherability.

However, human ingenuity has overcome such odds before. In 1952, architect Michael Ventris deciphered Linear B working in an analogous scenario - an unknown writing system (Linear B) and an unknown language (Mycenaean Greek, an archaic version of ancient Greek). Ventris had lots of texts available, but the task was almost impossible. And yet he succeeded.

For now, the stone is silent and lonely. But with my research team at Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, I am trying to find its voice.

My colleagues and I are developing Read-y Grammarian, an artificial intelligence program that can "learn" the surviving characters of the epigraph and guess and elaborate on the missing parts of its text. Unlike humans, the program doesn't have interpretive biases (cognitive bias informed by a researcher's beliefs). Mitigating these biases is a fundamental requirement for research in language deciphering.

If we can recover a reliable text for the slab, more material will be available for comparison, frequency analysis and pattern recognition - the first steps towards decipherment and hearing the voice of the stone for the first time.

Francesco Perono Cacciafoco, Associate Professor in Linguistics, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article. The Conversation

Source: The Conversation | Comments (3)

Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Myles 1 month ago
Put some AI to work and it will be solved.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Unusual Tournament 1 month ago
Looks Georgian or Armenian influenced to me
Comment icon #3 Posted by Piney 1 month ago
 Probably some form of Indic-Malay which has common origins with those alphabets.   

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News


Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon


For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles