Saturday, May 24, 2025
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Archaeology & History > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Archaeology & History

Princes in the Tower: A 500-year-old murder mystery solved at last?

By T.K. Randall
May 24, 2025 · Comment icon 2 comments
Princes in the Tower
A historical depiction of Edward V and the Duke of York. Image Credit: Paul Delaroche - 1830
The question of what happened to Richard III's nephews has long remained a topic of debate among historians.
When the remains of the 15th-Century English monarch King Richard III were unearthed beneath a council car park in 2012, it marked the end of a centuries-old mystery, but there remains another, equally enduring enigma surrounding Richard III that has long proven difficult to definitively solve.

The mystery in question surrounds the story that Richard had his two young nephews - Edward V and the Duke of York (generally known as the Princes in the Tower) - murdered in an attempt to aid his own ambitions.

Trouble is, nobody has been able to determine for sure if this actually happened.

Now, though, following an extensive investigation spanning more than a decade, Philippa Langley - the historian who discovered King Richard III's remains - has reached the conclusion that the princes were most likely not killed by the monarch at all.
Her findings are based on an examination of previously unseen letters and documents which suggest that after Richard had died and Henry VII became king, the two young princes reappeared and challenged his claim to the throne.

"But Henry attempted to cast the Yorkist Princes as impostors by giving them false names and reverse-engineering their stories," said Langley.

There are also records suggesting that there had been a rebellion headed up by "Edward IV's son".

Although these discoveries don't absolutely discount the possibility that the two princes really were murdered by Richard III, they do at the very least cast some serious doubt on the matter.

According to Langley, the onus is now on the proponents of the theory to prove that Richard was responsible.

Source: Independent | Comments (2)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Blue Star 2 hours ago
Dead by murder are no, they where certainly taken out of the equation.
Comment icon #2 Posted by Wepwawet 1 hour ago
As it suited both Richard III and Henry VII to have them dead, in fact neither could legitimately claim the throne while the princes lived,  then I think it very reasonable to assume that they were murdered.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles