Sunday, April 19, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Spirituality > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Spirituality

Pope Leo declares Rhode Island baby's revival to be a miracle

By T.K. Randall
July 26, 2025 · Comment icon 95 comments
Pope Leo
Image: Pope Leo XIV (file photo)
Credit: Edgar Beltrán, The Pillar / CC BY-SA 4.0 (adapted)
The case of a baby who began breathing after having no pulse for 65 minutes has been declared officially miraculous.
According to reports, the incident itself occurred all the way back in June 2007 when a baby - referred to as "little Tyquan" - was born premature and critically ill at the Memorial Hospital in Pawtucket.

The attending physician - Dr. Juan Sanchez-Esteban - had described in a later interview how the child had been born through induced labor and then Caesarean section due to a low fetal heart rate.

The medical team worked tirelessly to revive him, but after 65 minutes of seeing no sign of breathing or a pulse, they eventually reached the conclusion that he could not be saved.

Dr. Sanchez-Esteban, at that moment, called upon 19th-Century priest Father Salvador Valera Parra to save the infant after remembering a prayer to him that he had learned as a child.
When he then went to inform the child's parents of the terrible news, a nurse came rushing in to inform him that the infant had in fact starting breathing on his own without further medical intervention.

It was believed that his ordeal would have led to further complications down the line, but incredibly, the child went on to develop normally and has since led a healthy, active life.

Now Pope Leo has moved to recognize Father Salvador Valera Parra as being responsible for saving the child.

This alleged miracle has also advanced Father Parra's likelihood of becoming a saint (he must have two miracles attributed to him for this to happen).

Whether divine intervention had anything to do with the child's recovery, however, remains a matter of debate.

Source: Catholic Standard | Comments (95)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #86 Posted by joc 9 months ago
You are missing a huge point my friend.  Let's put your last sentence into perspective. Measuring Velocity creates time.    
Comment icon #87 Posted by DieChecker 9 months ago
From the wiki.. I wonder what are the odds there was praying over the person in nearly every one of those occurrences? I wonder if there's a medical deion of the child now that they're an adult?  Seems in about half the examples on the wiki article the subject was not being monitored, and declared dead after just examination. But it does seem that some were where the person went to a very low rate of heartbeat, and respiration, and later went back to normal.
Comment icon #88 Posted by Liquid Gardens 9 months ago
Couldn't agree more.  It's very difficult to me, other than feebly appealing to the typical lazy 'who knows the ways of God' to make it make any sense.  There are a terrible number of believers right now that are praying their broken hearts out for God to help their loved ones, and it's a fact that an enormous number of them are not going to have their prayer request fulfilled.  Oh, but sometimes, a prayer will invoke a divine miracle.  There's no indication to anyone of what's the right way to pray, and little rational explanation as to why God would set things up this way.  At best it's... [More]
Comment icon #89 Posted by Liquid Gardens 9 months ago
I agree that we should have doubt about the details of all these, and extra skeptical of the 'miracle' of this particular one in the OP.  Wonder many other prayer-healing links are going unrecognized?  Across all religions?  And don't see why this shouldn't go the other way, there's obvious biblical support for the idea of God doling out plagues and death too, I'm pretty confident that somewhere there are non-Catholic people out there who have serious maladies whose cause is unexplained/'miraculous' to doctors.  Could be God, could be Satan, angels, demons.  But at this point, with magic ... [More]
Comment icon #90 Posted by Sherapy 9 months ago
Well said. ??‍♀️
Comment icon #91 Posted by DieChecker 9 months ago
Welcome to the Religion section of UM. You've just outlined 90% of the posts here.
Comment icon #92 Posted by Liquid Gardens 9 months ago
As evaluated by who?  From my atheistic perspective I think 99% of posts about specific religious beliefs are on par with leprechauns, but it's pretty clear to me at least that there are believers who post here who don't agree with that.  You've shared some info on your own beliefs, you are stating them even though you agree they are as realistic as leprechauns?  For example you said on the ChatGPT thread, 'As a Christian I think prayers can see miraculous things happen. Because there's a higher power.'; you said that even though you think it's as realistic as saying, 'leprechauns are hidin... [More]
Comment icon #93 Posted by DieChecker 9 months ago
I was being facetious. However, anyone reading these threads would conclude pro-supernatural posts versus anti-supernatural posts, are probably about three to one. The number of posters who argue Pro, are roughly half of the Con posters. Let's look at this page as an example.  4 posts by Liquid Gardens. 5 posts by me. 2 by Sherapy 2 by Joc 2 by Guyver 1 by Eight Bits 1 by Still Waters 1 by Pallidin Joc, Eight Bits, Sherapy, yourself (LG), are all clearly on the side not supporting religion. Still Waters, Guyver, and Pallidin, can generally go either way. Sorry if I've overgeneralized people's... [More]
Comment icon #94 Posted by eight bits 8 months ago
But what has that to do with this thread? Pope Leo is hardly on the "fringy" side of religion; he leads over a billion adherents worldwide. If the Pope had commented on this situation and remarked "Sometimes Jesus works through doctors and nurses," then there would be little to discuss. That sounds like how a Christian religious administrator would see things, and we're all entitled to express our opinion. But that isn't what the Pope proposes. We are invited to overlook two and a half months of top calibre hospital care and instead to attribute the good clinical outcome to a single momentary ... [More]
Comment icon #95 Posted by DieChecker 8 months ago
I'd suggest some posters here think ALL religion is fringy. ? Well, his declaring a miracle is mainly for the Catholics anyway. I doubt many Protestants would say, "Yes, we need to evaluate and canonize this event.". And of the non-religious, I expect the Pope doesn't even consider them at all. At least this Pope anyway. The Pope declares it like a fact, but we can all agree there's really no facts regarding the miraculous. Otherwise they wouldn't be miravulous. Till next time than... ?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles