Sunday, April 19, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Palaeontology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All â–¾
Search Submit

Palaeontology

Neanderthals and modern humans worked together, new study finds

By T.K. Randall
April 15, 2026 · Comment icon 26 comments

Image: Early Human History
Credit: (PD) U.S. National Park Service
Excavations at Israel's Tinshemet Cave have revealed a level of inter-species co-operation never seen before.
Discoveries made at the site suggest that our ancestors didn't just live alongside Neanderthals, but may have also interacted and collaborated with them on a regular basis.

The cave itself is home to the first mid-Middle Palaeolithic burials found in five decades, making it a treasure trove for researchers attempting to learn more about the burial practices of the time.

But perhaps the most interesting insight from the excavations is what these burials reveal about the relationship between humans and Neanderthals.
Both species would have regularly interacted, sharing their social behaviors, technologies, ritualistic burial practices and even the symbolic use of ochre.

The findings conflict with the previous view that humans and Neanderthals kept to themselves and instead paints a picture of a close and complex set of interactions between the two species.

"Our data show that human connections and population interactions have been fundamental in driving cultural and technological innovations throughout history," said study co-author Prof. Yossi Zaidner of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

It is hoped that further discoveries at Tinshemet Cave will help to reveal an even more detailed picture of how our ancestors lived alongside and interacted with the Neanderthals 110,000 years ago.

Source: Science Daily | Comments (26)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #17 Posted by Abramelin 3 days ago
I know all about that, and I have posted about it a dozen times, but that was not my question.   This is:  
Comment icon #18 Posted by flying squid 3 days ago
I think that is an interesting question. But,I think it's not just a matter of the pure physical adaptation. Perhaps the African was not much better at adapting to colder temperatures, but he was far more curious to explore and conquer a new areas. It's in our blood, after all. Why didn't  Neanderthals descend from the northern, cold parts of Europe down to those famous caves in Germany (lion Man & Goddesses...) ? Obviously, the Neanderthals desire to discover and explore the new things was far less than that was of Homo. Sapiens. After all, that's why they disappeared.            ... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by Abramelin 2 days ago
Obviously, I don't have to explain to you that that is nothing short of utter bullscheise.   Scientists have come up with lots of reasons why the Neanderthals died out, and why we pale Africans didn't. We just don't know for sure.  
Comment icon #20 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 days ago
That's a very interesting point Tate, unfortunately it's impossible to prove today. But I agree with you on the subject it makes perfect sense.....
Comment icon #21 Posted by Piney 2 days ago
Our mutual ancestor H.Erectus left Africa first because of that desire. Then Heidelbergis who became Neanderthals.....so no... They were a smaller population that was less fertile and we probably bred them out along with the diseases we brought. 
Comment icon #22 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 days ago
I think they did know that there was a difference. I suspect that like today physical groups are very recognizable, in those days it was no different. But I am certain if they prejudged others like we do today, I certainly hope not, but it is certainly possible.
Comment icon #23 Posted by flying squid 2 days ago
How do we know Neanderthals were less fertile? The Aztecs, Mayas, and Incas were probably no less fertile than the Spaniards. But, the Spanish Inquisition wiped them all off the face of Earth.
Comment icon #24 Posted by Grim Reaper 6 2 days ago
I don't know if less fertile is the correct way to look at it. I believe it was the genetic diversity that was the real culprit. The fact is no knows why the Neanderthal populations dwindled, but once they did the genetic diversity dwindled along them. Even though they breed with Homo Saipans this was not enough to prevent the inevitable extinction that occurred. I think there was more too it, than what is know at this time, it was most likely a combination of many things. JIMHO
Comment icon #25 Posted by Piney 2 days ago
Molecular map from their DNA.  With one turd the folks at Cornell will tell you anything about your heritage, lifestyle and fertility. 
Comment icon #26 Posted by Abramelin 2 days ago
On average, Neanderthal mtDNA genomes differ from each other by 20.4 bases and are only 1/3 as diverse as modern humans (Briggs et al. 2009).  The low diversity might signal a small population size. Neanderthal nuclear DNA shows further evidence of small population sizes, including genetic evidence of incest https://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics/ancient-dna-and-neanderthals ===== Low population caused a low genetic diversity and probably inbreeding, which reduced the population's ability to filter out harmful mutations (inbreeding depression). It is unclear how this affected a single ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles