Saturday, April 18, 2026
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries Support Us
You are viewing: Home > News > Conspiracy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Conspiracy

Kim Kardashian revives Apollo Moon landing conspiracy theory

By T.K. Randall
October 31, 2025 · Comment icon 21 comments

Image: Eugene Cernan on the Moon During the Apollo 17 Mission
Credit: Harrison Schmitt (1972) / (PD) NASA
The US reality star brought up the idea that the Moon landings were all a hoax on her high-profile TV show.
The notion that the Apollo Moon landings were all faked has been around for a long time, though in more recent years, it's something that we haven't heard so much about - perhaps because fewer people believe it to be true these days.

Nonetheless, US celebrity Kim Kardashian has now managed to bring this particular conspiracy theory back into the limelight by mentioning it on a recent episode of The Kardashians.

The topic came up behind the scenes while she was filming a new show with Sarah Paulson.

"I'm sending you a million articles with both Buzz Aldrin and the other one," Kardashian told her, before reading from an article detailing which part of the expedition Aldrin had found the most scary.

"There was no scary moment because it didn't happen," she continued.

"It could've been scary, but it wasn't because it didn't happen."
"I center conspiracies all the time. I think it was fake. I've seen a few videos on Buzz Aldrin talking about how it didn't happen."

"He says it all the time now, in interviews. Maybe we should find Buzz Aldrin."

Her comments went on to generate so much debate on social media that even NASA felt it necessary to issue a response to set the record straight.

"Yes, we've been to the Moon before... 6 times!" wrote acting administrator Sean Duffy.

"And even better: [NASA Artemis] is going back under the leadership of [president Donald Trump]."

"We won the last space race and we will win this one too."

Whether these comments will be enough to allay the concerns of younger audiences who may have only now been exposed to this conspiracy theory for the first time, however, remains to be seen.

Source: The Guardian | Comments (21)




Other news and articles
Our latest videos Visit us on YouTube
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #12 Posted by Obviousman 6 months ago
Just another example of how dumb those people are. And those fat arses? You think it is attractive? We pander to ignorance & celebrity, and this is the result.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Edumakated 6 months ago
The one thing that makes me question it is that we abruptly stopped going and now claim we don't have the tech any longer to go back...   which makes zero sense to me given we have more computing power in a wrist watch now than they had in all of NASA at the time.  Not too mention the advancements in material science and other tech.  Just seems odd. Or just maybe we have and/are going back but it is top secret.  Or maybe we went and saw something that frightened us to not going back.  Just knowing our capitalistic mind and are political lust for power and dominance, it just seems weird t... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by OverSword 6 months ago
I would say it has more to do with specialized production means.  The space shuttle was much more advanced than anything we took to the moon but it could no go to the moon.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Axel88 6 months ago
come on we all know where the true moon landing has happened  and just by thinking of  Kim Kardashian you should too ! 
Comment icon #16 Posted by diddyman68 6 months ago
Then again i would like to hear paris hiltons views on the rise of ghengis Khan, in fact i would love to hear any millionaire celebrities views on politics , social justice etc ... I'm sure the hollywood people would love to voice their expert opinions on social and political affairs .  They need to be heard ....... Sarcasm .?
Comment icon #17 Posted by diddyman68 6 months ago
Maybe distracting from attending a bunch of diddy parties ?
Comment icon #18 Posted by Obviousman 6 months ago
We had the ability to have supersonic airliners al la Concorde... but we don't see them anymore - a massive government conspiracy? We had the ability to power commercial shipping with nuclear power.... but it is limited to Naval vessels. Is the Government trying to hide that nuclear power is a hoax? We had the ability to traverse the deepest depths of the oceans.... but we don't have the equipment to do it anymore. Why? Is there a secret civilisation on the ocean floor? The answer is NO - technology changes, direction of effort changes, public support changes, FUNDING changes.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Edumakated 6 months ago
The Concorde was a commercial enterprise.  The Concorde was in commercial service from 1976 till 2003.  There are other companies trying to bring back supersonic commercial flight.  Governments have restricted it and companies must make money. The same with using nuclear.  Governments have restricted it for good reason.   Your examples are commercial enterprises that have to make money and operate in a regulated environment.  Not a government entity deciding to go back to the moon.  Big difference.   I just find it strange that we get to the moon but yet had no desire to claim it or ... [More]
Comment icon #20 Posted by Obviousman 6 months ago
There is NO difference; you are just seeing it that way. It's money, plain & simple. Why didn't we go back to the Moon? No-one could afford a lunar base, and it certainly couldn't have a military function. People complained about the Apollo programme itself, demanding the money be spent elsewhere... and they won. Funding was cut, no Moon base, no Apollo 18 thru 20, no Mars flyby, no Mars landing. Skylab & ASTP got funded but only just, and the Shuttle had to go to the USAF, cap in hand, for funding. But now we have the technology to economically operate some mining facility on the Mo... [More]
Comment icon #21 Posted by Axel88 6 months ago
fuel efficiency Concorde supersonic is very fuel inefficient for commercial flights actually the enterprises are the gov via economical leverage and cannot be regulated as most of them are global enterprises now if bother or harassed by the gov they leave to another country and ruin the economy in their wake  no benefits, back in the first moon landing it was done to showcase American supremacy over the Soviet Union it was done not for science or the love of exploration, or understanding the universe  it was done merely as political move  we have technology it's just aimed at profits and be... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles