Friday, December 9, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Humans would beat neanderthals in marathon


Posted on Saturday, 12 February, 2011 | Comment icon 29 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: CC 3.0 KJohansson

 
A new study has compared neanderthals and modern humans to see how they'd perform in a race.

The results suggest that modern humans would have had the edge over neanderthals in a long endurance race due to the length of certain limb bones. Neanderthals however would have been better at walking long distances and were physically stronger.

"Humans, versus other great apes, are built for running fast and long as opposed to very impressive strength, but what about Neanderthals? If a modern human and a Neanderthal competed in a marathon, who would win?."

  View: Full article |  Source: Discovery News

  Discuss: View comments (29)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #20 Posted by Classified Document on 13 February, 2011, 8:51
Us Humans Would Be Pulling Off Some Sweet Parkour. Kong Vaulting Mammoths And Speed Vaulting Saber-toothed-cats!
Comment icon #21 Posted by AsG1989 on 13 February, 2011, 10:06
No ****, is all I have to say.
Comment icon #22 Posted by tipotep on 13 February, 2011, 12:28
What would you have an anthropologist study that would be more "productive?" Especially an anthropologist specializing in ancient man and. Google Anthropology - it doesnt say that its the study of how fast neanderthals can run compared to homo sapiens. TiP.
Comment icon #23 Posted by ShadowSot on 13 February, 2011, 13:57
Google Anthropology - it doesnt say that its the study of how fast neanderthals can run compared to homo sapiens. TiP. No, but this falls under it, and paleontology. They were analyzing the differences in physical characteristics between Neanderthal and modern man, and this is one of the differences they found. Again, what would you have them study?
Comment icon #24 Posted by danielost on 13 February, 2011, 14:55
That's not strictly true. Yes, because of their more robust frame, the Neanderthals would have been more efficient at retaining heat than H. sap. I agree with that part of what you said. However, H. sap. could use clothes to counter-act this. However, the Neanderthals more robust build would have made them more prone to 'overheating' in any climate when undertaking some strenuous activity. you forget their large nose, which is their radiator.
Comment icon #25 Posted by tipotep on 13 February, 2011, 21:42
No, but this falls under it, and paleontology. They were analyzing the differences in physical characteristics between Neanderthal and modern man, and this is one of the differences they found. Again, what would you have them study? Meh im sure your just looking for an argument but ok i will bite ...... So whats the next " Big " find then ? " Humans would beat Neanderthals in a UFC Fight " ? They should see if neanderthal man was more suited to stand up fighting or more a ground and pound style. Fire away big boy . TiP.
Comment icon #26 Posted by ShadowSot on 13 February, 2011, 21:51
Meh im sure your just looking for an argument but ok i will bite ...... So whats the next " Big " find then ? " Humans would beat Neanderthals in a UFC Fight " ? They should see if neanderthal man was more suited to stand up fighting or more a ground and pound style. Fire away big boy . TiP. What this study showed is that the body structure or physiology of modern humans is more suited to long distance running, where the neanderthal was not. It was spun by the news article, but that's the basis of the finding. The writer of the article is the one who tried to make it appeal to the masses. You'... [More]
Comment icon #27 Posted by tipotep on 13 February, 2011, 22:15
What this study showed is that the body structure or physiology of modern humans is more suited to long distance running, where the neanderthal was not. It was spun by the news article, but that's the basis of the finding. The writer of the article is the one who tried to make it appeal to the masses. You're saying it's a waste of money, it seems to fit in fine study of ancient man. Ok on a serious note - I agree that the finding itself , is valid data .... i find it a waste of time and money that its claimed to be " big news " when really it deserves to be added to the list of differences bet... [More]
Comment icon #28 Posted by ShadowSot on 14 February, 2011, 3:46
Ok on a serious note - I agree that the finding itself , is valid data .... i find it a waste of time and money that its claimed to be " big news " when really it deserves to be added to the list of differences between Neanderthals and homo S. Data - yes Worth reporting , writing a specific paper on - No TiP Discovery.com is a science website, the specific section of the website is dedicated to new information on human research. It's not really meant for public release. As far as it goes,many scientific papers are probably not interesting reading for the average person.
Comment icon #29 Posted by 27vet on 8 April, 2011, 7:40
Just clone a Neanderthal and put him to the test.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Legendary astronaut John Glenn dies aged 95
12-9-2016
Glenn became a national hero back in 1962 when he became the first American ever to orbit the Earth.
Actual dinosaur tail found preserved in amber
12-8-2016
The unprecedented 99 million-year-old specimen contains preserved bones, soft tissues and feathers.
Mars One delays first manned mission to Mars
12-8-2016
The Netherlands-based firm has pushed back its ambitious plans by several years due to funding issues.
Bleak figures show giraffes face extinction
12-8-2016
The world's tallest animal has suffered a worrying decline in numbers over the last three decades.
Other news in this category
Actual dinosaur tail found preserved in amber
Posted 12-8-2016 | 34 comments
The unprecedented 99 million-year-old specimen contains preserved bones, soft tissues and feathers....
 
Japan is set to build a robotic Jurassic Park
Posted 11-19-2016 | 12 comments
Dino-a-Live will offer visitors the next best thing to real dinosaurs without the risk of being eaten....
 
Huge 'sea monster' fossil found in Antarctica
Posted 11-15-2016 | 14 comments
Palaeontologists have unearthed the fossil remains of a gigantic Cretaceous-era ocean predator....
 
World's first dinosaur brain fossil unearthed
Posted 10-29-2016 | 3 comments
The discovery was made by fossil hunter Jamie Hiscocks who found the specimen on a beach near London....
 
Right-handedness found in human ancestor
Posted 10-24-2016 | 4 comments
Dominant hand preference appears to date back to a time long before modern humans arrived on the scene....
 
What sounds did the dinosaurs really make ?
Posted 10-14-2016 | 16 comments
Contrary to popular belief, the dinosaurs probably did not make loud roaring noises like in the movies....
 
Gigantic dinosaur footprint found in Mongolia
Posted 10-1-2016 | 12 comments
Palaeontologists have identified a prehistoric Titanosaur footprint that is the size of a human torso....
 
Proteins found in prehistoric ostrich eggs
Posted 9-28-2016 | 5 comments
Scientists have discovered the world's oldest genetic information within 3.8 million-year-old eggshells....
 
Cancer evidence dates back 1.7 million years
Posted 9-19-2016 | 6 comments
Scientists have found signs of bone cancer in the fossil remains of an early South African hominin....
 
'Super-cute' dinosaur had built-in camouflage
Posted 9-16-2016 | 6 comments
Scientists have determined the skin color of a small forest dinosaur by analyzing its fossilized skin....
 
Storr Lochs Monster is a real-life Nessie
Posted 9-7-2016 | 3 comments
A near-complete ichthyosaur fossil found in Scotland is finally getting the attention it deserves....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ