Spring comes early due to global warming

http://pages.science-skeptical.de/MWP/MedievalWarmPeriod.html "The idea of a medieval warm period was formulated for the first time in 1965 by the English climatologist Hubert H. Lamb [1]. Lamb, who founded the UK Climate Research Unit (CRU) in 1971, saw the peak of the warming period from 1000 to 1300, i.e. in the High Middle Ages. He estimated that temperatures then were 1-2 ° C above the normal period of 1931-1960. In the high North, it was even up to 4 degrees warmer" http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/the-medieval-warm-period-a-global-phenonmena-unprecedented-warming-or-unprecedented-... [More]

http://pages.science-skeptical.de/MWP/MedievalWarmPeriod.html "The idea of a medieval warm period was formulated for the first time in 1965 by the English climatologist Hubert H. Lamb [1]. Lamb, who founded the UK Climate Research Unit (CRU) in 1971, saw the peak of the warming period from 1000 to 1300, i.e. in the High Middle Ages. He estimated that temperatures then were 1-2 ° C above the normal period of 1931-1960. In the high North, it was even up to 4 degrees warmer" http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/29/the-medieval-warm-period-a-global-phenonmena-unprecedented-warming-or-unprecedented-... [More]

many of those papers were recently written, last couple of years. click on the map and click on each chart to see each paper and its publication date http://pages.science-skeptical.de/MWP/MedievalWarmPeriod.html or alternatively, ignore it and just make crap up.

many of those papers were recently written, last couple of years. click on the map and click on each chart to see each paper and its publication date http://pages.science-skeptical.de/MWP/MedievalWarmPeriod.html or alternatively, ignore it and just make crap up. I don't think you have quite understood what I explained to you about your graphs have you?

So you accept older data over new data and from a period when climatology was a very limited science? You are basically accepting less accurate information over more accurate information on the say so of someone who doesn't study climatology. I don't think you have quite understood what I explained to you about your graphs have you? I understand that you were trying to fool yourself that those charts were older data from a period when climatology was a very limited science. anyone can check. stop lying to yourself.

global warming isnt real...

global warming isnt real... Thats all you've got to say at this stage - pathetic. Br Cornelius

I understand that you were trying to fool yourself that those charts were older data from a period when climatology was a very limited science. anyone can check. stop lying to yourself. No you don't. You still haven't understood what I said. I certainly never said what you are insinuating. global warming isnt real... Shame those darn facts say otherwise

So you accept older data over new data and from a period when climatology was a very limited science? You are basically accepting less accurate information over more accurate information on the say so of someone who doesn't study climatology.

You realise that is in reference to just one post don't you, you know, the one it quoted Sorry I thought you'd be able to understand that