Friday, May 27, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Recognition and respect for cryptobiologists


Posted on Thursday, 23 June, 2011 | Comment icon 31 comments | News tip by: Karlis


Image credit: stockxpert

 
A shout out to the Bigfoot hunters and other researchers who dedicate their lives to finding cryptids.

Somewhat excluded from the realm of mainstream science, cryptozoology involves the search for new unidentified and extinct species of animals based on reports and stories from around the world. From the Loch Ness Monster to the Loveland Frog, the number of cases of strange encounters with unknown creatures are as numerous as they are bizarre.

"Everyone knows about fabled creatures like Nessie and Bigfoot, but cryptobiologists actually chase a far larger menagerie of exotic beasts which they collectively term "cryptids"."

  View: Full article |  Source: New Scientist

  Discuss: View comments (31)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #22 Posted by DieChecker on 27 June, 2011, 0:33
I think mostly Strangelove is right in that most "Cryptobiologists" are looking for fame or fortune, either as a blogger, writer, TV personnality, or otherwise are hobbiests who think it is fun. If I was to go Honestly looking for Bigfoot or a jackalope, or a hodag, or the hoop snake, I'd get a biology background first, then knowing what is possible and impossible, gather evidence. I'd call myself a biologist, just as Meldrum does, and go about my Research quietly and thuroughly. Cryptozoologists that call themselves cryptozoologists are the ones you need to watchout for.
Comment icon #23 Posted by modas on 27 June, 2011, 20:34
kangoro first seen by peple sayd to be stud up like people had two heads vhich lookedlike dears with no horns and they jumped like frogs and no body beleved those people and this explains not just how crazy people can tell about unknown animals but it explains that people can find cryptids.
Comment icon #24 Posted by evancj on 27 June, 2011, 22:39
Since the concept of cryptozoology did not exist when kangaroos were first described by Europeans it would have been impossible for a cryptozoologist to have made that discovery.
Comment icon #25 Posted by Doctor_Strangelove on 27 June, 2011, 22:51
[spoiler]Kangaroos weren't discovered by cryptozoology[/spoiler]
Comment icon #26 Posted by Carnivorous Entity on 28 June, 2011, 21:29
Well what's quantifying a cryptid for you? People who like to discount cryptozoology say that pretty much any species discovered fairly recently weren't cryptids. Why, though? Take the Okapi. There were myths surrounding it. For something to be a cryptid it doesn't necessarily have to be an acid-spitting death worm or a giant ape, does it now? If a biologist were to confirm a new species that had folklore or sightings, then that would make it a cryptid, would it not? While a lot of 'cryptozoologists' who spend their days looking around for a sasquatch in the backyard can ... [More]
Comment icon #27 Posted by aquatus1 on 28 June, 2011, 22:53
No, it would not. Cryptids are not simply "unknown" animals. Cryptids are "hidden" animals. As in they are not just hidden from sight, but from pretty much all other means of detection. Cryptozoology is generally used to refer to the study of two sorts of creature: creatures that are incompatible with the environment, and creatures that are out of place and/or time. The second type of cryptid is not really such a mystery, with the increased access of travel and the unfortunate human predilection of bringing home strange animals, getting bored of them, and releasing them i... [More]
Comment icon #28 Posted by Carnivorous Entity on 28 June, 2011, 23:58
Noted. You make a strong point, I don't really entertain the idea of the sasquatche and n/t/che/whatever-essies. The type of stuff I take stock in wouldn't be considered cryptids by the literal definition, I suppose.
Comment icon #29 Posted by evancj on 29 June, 2011, 0:45
I have struggled with this very same question Mr. Entity for a multitude of reasons. I think the main reason is because I have a general biology degree (I am not a biologist and never have been). Also because the term is relatively a new concept, and a very loosely defined one, I have a hard time accepting it as valid. There seems not to be a consensus for the meaning of the term, not even among so-called cryptozoologists. For example I can look up the definition of zoology, biology, or physics and get the same definition for each in every dictionary that I look at. On the other hand when I ... [More]
Comment icon #30 Posted by Carnivorous Entity on 29 June, 2011, 5:48
Very sadly true. If all those louts spent time doing anything but looking for(and exploiting) one particular(and implausible) animal, they may have actually discovered a few new species by now.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Giant squid may grow larger than a school bus
5-27-2016
A new study has suggested that giant squid may actually grow to be much larger than previously believed.
Aristotle's lost tomb has finally been found
5-26-2016
The long-sought final resting place of the Greek philosopher has been unearthed at a site in Macedonia.
New optical clock is most accurate ever built
5-26-2016
Scientists have come up with a clock so accurate that it could even redefine the length of a second.
Neanderthal-built stone rings found in cave
5-25-2016
Remarkable prehistoric structures made from stalagmites have been discovered inside a cave in France.
Other news in this category
Residents to hunt 8ft 'werewolf' in England
Posted 5-16-2016 | 61 comments
Multiple witnesses claim to have seen a 'half man half dog' creature known locally as 'Old Stinker'....
 
Nessie Sightings Register is now 20 years old
Posted 5-13-2016 | 8 comments
The Loch Ness Monster Sightings Register has recorded over 1,000 sightings over the last two decades....
 
Woman dies while hunting legendary monster
Posted 4-26-2016 | 21 comments
Roquel Bain was struck by a train while seeking a creature that is said to lure people on to the tracks....
 
Couple encounter a huge cat in the Cotswolds
Posted 4-15-2016 | 18 comments
A terrified couple in England have sketched a creature that they encountered while out driving at night....
 
Lost Nessie movie prop found in Loch Ness
Posted 4-13-2016 | 18 comments
A large model monster used in an old Sherlock Holmes movie has been identified at the bottom of the loch....
 
Mystery 'creature' filmed in the River Thames
Posted 3-31-2016 | 48 comments
Strange footage has emerged online this week of a large, dark shape surfacing in the River Thames....
 
Thylacine sighted in Australian coastal town
Posted 3-29-2016 | 22 comments
Being extinct hasn't stopped the elusive Tasmanian tiger from making an appearance every once in a while....
 
New £1.4M catamaran to join hunt for Nessie
Posted 3-13-2016 | 11 comments
A cruise ship company in the Scottish Highlands has invested in a new boat called 'Spirit of Loch Ness'....
 
'Bloodsucking creature' sparks hunt in China
Posted 3-1-2016 | 20 comments
A mysterious animal is responsible for killing more than 200 chickens and ducks in the village of Pudong....
 
'Yeti' filmed on slopes of Spanish ski resort
Posted 2-7-2016 | 42 comments
A woefully unconvincing Abominable Snowman has turned up in footage recorded at Formigal in Spain....
 
Trekker takes photograph of 'Yeti footprints'
Posted 2-1-2016 | 58 comments
Steve Berry encountered a mysterious set of single-file tracks on a steep mountain slope in Bhutan....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ