Friday, July 1, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Who was responsible for Piltdown Man ?


Posted on Monday, 6 February, 2012 | Comment icon 17 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: John Cooke

 
Researchers are conducting a new study to determine who was behind one of archaeology's greatest hoaxes.

Piltdown Man was the name given to an alleged human ancestor unearthed in a gravel pit in England 100 years ago in the form of skull fragments that revealed it to have a large brain but a primitive jawbone and teeth. The find caused a sensation at the time, that was until it was revealed to be nothing more than a hoax. Now researchers are hoping to study the fragments in more detail to determine who might have been behind what continues to be one of the biggest archaeological hoaxes in history.

"In a few weeks, a group of British researchers will enter the labyrinthine store of London's Natural History Museum and remove several dark-coloured pieces of primate skull and jawbone from a small metal cabinet."

  View: Full article |  Source: Guardian Unlimited

  Discuss: View comments (17)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #8 Posted by FurthurBB on 8 February, 2012, 14:18
Really interesting article! I hope they find what they are looking for.
Comment icon #9 Posted by FurthurBB on 8 February, 2012, 14:19
Those people who knew exposing the fraud would stop millions of young minds from being brainwashed into believing that the piltdown man was the 'missing link' that proved evilution. even today schools use the same tainted charts and graphs to indoctrinate CHILDREN into the religion of evolutionism. Atheists using their own tools of indoctrination to swell the ranks in their church of unbelievers. Evolution has nothing to do with atheism. There is nothing about evolution that would create unbelievers.
Comment icon #10 Posted by FurthurBB on 8 February, 2012, 14:22
And then they have the audacity to pat themselves on the back and claim what wonderful people they are that they finally after generations have been convinced of evolution based on such an 'obvious' fraud, to 'expose' the fraud. They have the nerve to claim it proves how much integrity they have. hahahahahaha. As long as money is shoved at people to prove what the religion of evolution wants them to prove, they will continue to fudge data and even completely ignore anything that would bring their theory into question, and even make up false data and support it for generations. Obviously you ha... [More]
Comment icon #11 Posted by Sundew on 8 February, 2012, 20:18
Personally I wish creationists would do some homework and understand the evolution of their own religion and bed-time book of choice. Faith and ignorance tend to work together quite well for the uneducated. Point taken, for the Bible says, "Always be prepared to give and answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect". However, this hoax was perpetuated as fact in school textbooks long after the truth about it was revealed, and for all I know is STILL being treated as a fact. So a little scientific honesty couldn't hurt ei... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by Neognosis on 8 February, 2012, 20:37
this hoax was perpetuated as fact in school textbooks long after the truth about it was revealed, and for all I know is STILL being treated as a fact. Do you have evidence for this claim? Also, to be clear again, because I don't think some of you understand... Piltdown man was reexamined when a flood of new evidence conflicted with the timeline that a genuine Piltdown man would have necessitated. This is how "science" works. We form theories and timelines based on evidence. So, when the theory and timeline was called into question by new evidence, scientists reexamined the old evidence. And th... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by FurthurBB on 8 February, 2012, 22:35
Do you have evidence for this claim? Also, to be clear again, because I don't think some of you understand... Piltdown man was reexamined when a flood of new evidence conflicted with the timeline that a genuine Piltdown man would have necessitated. This is how "science" works. We form theories and timelines based on evidence. So, when the theory and timeline was called into question by new evidence, scientists reexamined the old evidence. And thus found it to be faked. This is different from belief and religion, where nothing new happens and evidence or lack thereof means nothing. Yeah, I woul... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by Myles on 8 February, 2012, 22:59
Do you have evidence for this claim? Also, to be clear again, because I don't think some of you understand... Piltdown man was reexamined when a flood of new evidence conflicted with the timeline that a genuine Piltdown man would have necessitated. This is how "science" works. We form theories and timelines based on evidence. So, when the theory and timeline was called into question by new evidence, scientists reexamined the old evidence. And thus found it to be faked. This is different from belief and religion, where nothing new happens and evidence or lack thereof means nothing. Which means ... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by Copasetic on 8 February, 2012, 23:45
Point taken, for the Bible says, "Always be prepared to give and answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect". However, this hoax was perpetuated as fact in school textbooks long after the truth about it was revealed, and for all I know is STILL being treated as a fact. So a little scientific honesty couldn't hurt either unless of course the goal is indoctrination and not education. Of all the children who were taught the "facts" of Piltdown Man, how many will ever learn that it was faked? It reminds me of some horrible... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by SatampraZeiros on 26 February, 2012, 22:25
so its bad that Piltdown man was taught as "fact" but its not that bad that the "virgin" Mary is also taught as fact? or Christmas? ho ho ho. I guess creationists and evolutionists arent so different after all huh?
Comment icon #17 Posted by Neognosis on 27 February, 2012, 14:33
Which means that most that we know may not be fact. "fact-as-we-know-it" and fact are 2 different things. Well, that's the thing with science. Science uses EVIDENCE to support theories. When the evidence is intentionally hoaxed, then the resulting theory will be incorrect. But, when new EVIDENCE emerged, causing scientists to take another look at piltdown man because he didn't conform to the newly unearthed evidence, they discovered he was a hoax. If scientists behaved like creationists, they would NOT have gone back and reexamined Piltdown man. Instead, they would have tried to subvert and di... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5709912
259245
160995

 
Hole in the ozone layer is starting to heal
7-1-2016
A large hole in the Earth's protective ozone layer is finally starting to show signs of healing up.
Man swims in 1,500-gallon pool of Coca-Cola
6-30-2016
The remarkable stunt saw a man jump in to a pool filled with several thousand bottles of fizzy drink.
Disclosure advocate releases NORAD UFO files
6-30-2016
Victor Viggiani released the documents to the public during the Alien Cosmic Expo event on Saturday.
Scientists succeed in making their own lava
6-29-2016
A team from the State University of New York at Buffalo created their own magma as part of an experiment.
Other news in this category
Mammoth fossils found under street in Mexico
Posted 6-28-2016 | 4 comments
The well-preserved 14,000-year-old remains were unearthed by utility workers in the city of Tultepec....
 
Killer asteroid almost wiped out mammals too
Posted 6-20-2016 | 3 comments
The asteroid which wiped out the dinosaurs almost spelled disaster for the world's mammals as well....
 
New species of ichthyosaur unearthed in UK
Posted 6-14-2016 | 4 comments
The prehistoric aquatic reptile fossil, which was found in a quarry, dates back over 200 million years....
 
Neanderthal-built stone rings found in cave
Posted 5-25-2016 | 16 comments
Remarkable prehistoric structures made from stalagmites have been discovered inside a cave in France....
 
Humans lived in America earlier than thought
Posted 5-16-2016 | 25 comments
New evidence has pushed the arrival of the first humans in the Americas back more than 1,500 years....
 
Scientists find first ever fossilized heart
Posted 4-20-2016 | 7 comments
The fossil organ was discovered inside the remains of a fish specimen dating back 119 million years....
 
Dinosaurs 'in decline' before asteroid strike
Posted 4-19-2016 | 21 comments
A new study has suggested that the dinosaurs had already been dying out long before the asteroid hit....
 
Deep-sea creatures survived the apocalypse
Posted 4-17-2016 | 4 comments
Scientists have determined how deep-sea creatures survived the asteroid impact that killed the dinosaurs....
 
Did human diseases doom the Neanderthals ?
Posted 4-15-2016 | 5 comments
Recent studies have suggested that diseases carried by modern humans may have proven catastrophic....
 
Prehistoric snakeskin shows signs of color
Posted 4-2-2016 | 5 comments
Scientists have been able to determine the skin color of a snake that lived over 10 million years ago....
 
Did competition for food wipe out Megalodon ?
Posted 4-1-2016 | 6 comments
The largest shark that ever lived may have been driven to extinction by competition from other predators....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ