Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Is Ales Stenar the Swedish Stonehenge ?

Posted on Friday, 20 April, 2012 | Comment icon 4 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: CC 3.0 Fred J

 
A research team has found new evidence that Sweden's Ales Stenar is far older than previously thought.

The megalithic structure comprised of 59 huge boulders is located near the fishing village of Kåseberga and is thought to have been built about 1,000 years ago near the end of the Iron Age. But now researchers believe the site could have been built a lot earlier, up to 2,500 years ago, making it Sweden's own answer to Stonehenge. "We can now say Stonehenge has a younger sister, but she's so much more beautiful," said retired geologist Nils-Axel Mörner who co-authored the research.

"Ancient Scandinavians dragged 59 boulders to a seaside cliff near what is now the Swedish fishing village of Kåseberga."

  View: Full article

 Source: Live Science


  Discuss: View comments (4)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Conrad Clough on 19 April, 2012, 14:23
Archaeologists using radiocarbon dating have calculated that Ales Stenar was built about 1,400 years agocomments like this always amuse me... since you can't date stone that way (and even if you could do so, using one of the other dating methods that works on stone it would only tell you the age of the rock, not when it was placed there by men)... I assume that they used organic material found at the site to do their testing, but it would be nice if the article mentioned what they actually radiocarbon dated.
Comment icon #2 Posted by siggiesis on 21 April, 2012, 8:34
I was left wondering what exactly they radiocarbon-dated. Even if they took debris from old structures or pits around the site, it can still be unreliable. Perhaps the geologist has a point about it being older for some (shocking) academic reason. Sometimes archaeologists annoy me with their god complexes.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Leonardo on 21 April, 2012, 8:54
comments like this always amuse me... since you can't date stone that way (and even if you could do so, using one of the other dating methods that works on stone it would only tell you the age of the rock, not when it was placed there by men)... I assume that they used organic material found at the site to do their testing, but it would be nice if the article mentioned what they actually radiocarbon dated. It's worth pointing out the sentence containing this claim was written by a journalist, not an archaeologist. It's quite possible the archaeologists did not use carbon-dating to date the age... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Melo on 21 April, 2012, 9:40
Thanks Stillwaters, never heard of it befroe. Amazing. http://news.discovery.com/history/stonehenge-sweden-120419.html


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Could dust have carried alien life to Earth ?
11-20-2017
Scientists believe that interstellar dust streams might be able to transfer organisms between planets.
Big earthquakes to occur more often in 2018
11-20-2017
A periodic slowing of the rotation of the Earth is likely to result in an upsurge in earthquakes next year.
NASA scientist is fed up with Nibiru theories
11-19-2017
Astrophysicist David Morrison has been repeatedly explaining to people that Nibiru doesn't exist for years.
Dalhousie Mountain carvings mystery endures
11-19-2017
A series of names carved in to the rocks of Dalhousie Mountain are thought to date back over 100 years.
Other news in this category
Buddha's cremated remains found in China
Posted 11-15-2017 | 9 comments
A ceramic box thought to contain the remains of Buddha himself has been discovered in Jingchuan County....
 
Rare 17th-century map of Australia resurfaces
Posted 11-7-2017 | 13 comments
The incredibly rare map, of which only a few are known to exist, has reappeared after 350 years....
 
Could the island city of Nan Madol be Atlantis?
Posted 11-6-2017 | 57 comments
Built on an island in the middle of the Pacific, this mysterious ancient city remains a modern-day enigma....
 
Archaeologist criticizes 'hidden chamber' find
Posted 11-5-2017 | 842 comments
Zahi Hawass has spoken out about the recent discovery of a large void in the Great Pyramid of Giza....
 
Mysterious void found inside Great Pyramid
Posted 11-2-2017 | 842 comments
Japanese and French scientists have announced the discovery of what could be a large hidden chamber....
 
Expert reconstructs face of Scottish 'witch'
Posted 10-31-2017 | 19 comments
A forensic artist has pieced together the appearance of a woman who was once imprisoned for witchcraft....
 
First recorded eclipse was 3,000 years ago
Posted 10-30-2017 | 3 comments
Researchers have been able to trace the first ever recorded solar eclipse back to the time of the pharaohs....
 
Mystery stone structures found in Saudi Arabia
Posted 10-26-2017 | 15 comments
Over 400 unexplained structures have been discovered in the Saudi Arabian desert using Google Earth....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ