Sunday, July 23, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Is Ales Stenar the Swedish Stonehenge ?

Posted on Friday, 20 April, 2012 | Comment icon 4 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: CC 3.0 Fred J

 
A research team has found new evidence that Sweden's Ales Stenar is far older than previously thought.

The megalithic structure comprised of 59 huge boulders is located near the fishing village of Kåseberga and is thought to have been built about 1,000 years ago near the end of the Iron Age. But now researchers believe the site could have been built a lot earlier, up to 2,500 years ago, making it Sweden's own answer to Stonehenge. "We can now say Stonehenge has a younger sister, but she's so much more beautiful," said retired geologist Nils-Axel Mörner who co-authored the research.

"Ancient Scandinavians dragged 59 boulders to a seaside cliff near what is now the Swedish fishing village of Kåseberga."

  View: Full article

 Source: Live Science


  Discuss: View comments (4)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Conrad Clough on 19 April, 2012, 14:23
Archaeologists using radiocarbon dating have calculated that Ales Stenar was built about 1,400 years agocomments like this always amuse me... since you can't date stone that way (and even if you could do so, using one of the other dating methods that works on stone it would only tell you the age of the rock, not when it was placed there by men)... I assume that they used organic material found at the site to do their testing, but it would be nice if the article mentioned what they actually radiocarbon dated.
Comment icon #2 Posted by siggiesis on 21 April, 2012, 8:34
I was left wondering what exactly they radiocarbon-dated. Even if they took debris from old structures or pits around the site, it can still be unreliable. Perhaps the geologist has a point about it being older for some (shocking) academic reason. Sometimes archaeologists annoy me with their god complexes.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Leonardo on 21 April, 2012, 8:54
comments like this always amuse me... since you can't date stone that way (and even if you could do so, using one of the other dating methods that works on stone it would only tell you the age of the rock, not when it was placed there by men)... I assume that they used organic material found at the site to do their testing, but it would be nice if the article mentioned what they actually radiocarbon dated. It's worth pointing out the sentence containing this claim was written by a journalist, not an archaeologist. It's quite possible the archaeologists did not use carbon-dating to date the age... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Melo on 21 April, 2012, 9:40
Thanks Stillwaters, never heard of it befroe. Amazing. http://news.discovery.com/history/stonehenge-sweden-120419.html


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5947954
256092
168259

 
Did sea creatures push US in to Vietnam War ?
7-22-2017
Back in 1964, the Gulf of Tonkin incident resulted in a renewed commitment to war with Vietnam.
Scientist has 'solved' the Bermuda Triangle
7-22-2017
Dr Karl Kruszelnicki maintains that the answer to the mystery lies in little more than basic human error.
Scientists develop bizarre worm-like robot
7-22-2017
Stanford University researchers have built a robot that can literally worm its way around anything.
Mystery of Abe Lincoln's Bixby letter solved
7-21-2017
Forensic linguists have 'almost certainly' determined who really wrote the famous Civil War-era letter.
Other news in this category
Australia find 'rewrites the history books'
Posted 7-20-2017 | 5 comments
Archaeologists now believe that Australia was colonized 18,000 years earlier than previously thought....
 
Ancient Roman sarcophagus found in London
Posted 7-19-2017 | 2 comments
Archaeologists working near Borough Market have discovered a coffin dating back over 1,600 years....
 
Ancient Hippocrates text discovered in Egypt
Posted 7-17-2017 | 3 comments
Archaeologists have uncovered new writings by Hippocrates, the famed 'father of Western medicine'....
 
Ancient monuments used for moonlit ceremonies
Posted 7-13-2017 | 1 comment
Archaeologists have found that ancient stone monuments may have had a hidden purpose....
 
'Underworld' tunnel found beneath Teotihuacan
Posted 7-8-2017 | 5 comments
Archaeologists have discovered a mysterious tunnel underneath the ancient city's Pyramid of the Moon....
 
How has Roman concrete lasted 2,000 years ?
Posted 7-4-2017 | 6 comments
The remarkable longevity of Roman sea piers has proven something of a mystery to modern engineers....
 
Aztec tower of skulls unearthed in Mexico
Posted 7-3-2017 | 4 comments
Archaeologists have located the site of a gruesome structure that was built from hundreds of human skulls....
 
Lost Mesopotamian city discovered in Iraq
Posted 6-7-2017 | 11 comments
Archaeologists have unearthed the long-lost ruins of a 4,000-year-old city known as Xarab-i Kilashin....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ