Wednesday, May 24, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Is Ales Stenar the Swedish Stonehenge ?

Posted on Friday, 20 April, 2012 | Comment icon 4 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: CC 3.0 Fred J

 
A research team has found new evidence that Sweden's Ales Stenar is far older than previously thought.

The megalithic structure comprised of 59 huge boulders is located near the fishing village of Kåseberga and is thought to have been built about 1,000 years ago near the end of the Iron Age. But now researchers believe the site could have been built a lot earlier, up to 2,500 years ago, making it Sweden's own answer to Stonehenge. "We can now say Stonehenge has a younger sister, but she's so much more beautiful," said retired geologist Nils-Axel Mörner who co-authored the research.

"Ancient Scandinavians dragged 59 boulders to a seaside cliff near what is now the Swedish fishing village of Kåseberga."

  View: Full article

 Source: Live Science


  Discuss: View comments (4)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by Conrad Clough on 19 April, 2012, 14:23
Archaeologists using radiocarbon dating have calculated that Ales Stenar was built about 1,400 years agocomments like this always amuse me... since you can't date stone that way (and even if you could do so, using one of the other dating methods that works on stone it would only tell you the age of the rock, not when it was placed there by men)... I assume that they used organic material found at the site to do their testing, but it would be nice if the article mentioned what they actually radiocarbon dated.
Comment icon #2 Posted by siggiesis on 21 April, 2012, 8:34
I was left wondering what exactly they radiocarbon-dated. Even if they took debris from old structures or pits around the site, it can still be unreliable. Perhaps the geologist has a point about it being older for some (shocking) academic reason. Sometimes archaeologists annoy me with their god complexes.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Leonardo on 21 April, 2012, 8:54
comments like this always amuse me... since you can't date stone that way (and even if you could do so, using one of the other dating methods that works on stone it would only tell you the age of the rock, not when it was placed there by men)... I assume that they used organic material found at the site to do their testing, but it would be nice if the article mentioned what they actually radiocarbon dated. It's worth pointing out the sentence containing this claim was written by a journalist, not an archaeologist. It's quite possible the archaeologists did not use carbon-dating to date the age... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Melo on 21 April, 2012, 9:40
Thanks Stillwaters, never heard of it befroe. Amazing. http://news.discovery.com/history/stonehenge-sweden-120419.html


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Whales only became huge relatively recently
5-24-2017
They may be giants of the deep today, but blue whales only gained their huge size 2-3 million years ago.
Why do flamingos stand on only one leg ?
5-24-2017
Scientists have determined that flamingos prefer to stand on one leg as it helps them conserve energy.
Neil Armstrong's bag could fetch up to $4M
5-23-2017
A bag used by the late astronaut to collect samples during the Apollo 11 mission is to be sold at auction.
What caused the Hindenburg to catch fire ?
5-23-2017
80 years on from the disaster, the exact cause of the inferno that destroyed the airship remains unclear.
Other news in this category
Man finds Viking treasure with metal detector
Posted 5-21-2017 | 20 comments
Derek McLennan earned almost $2.6 million after unearthing a horde of 10th-century Viking artefacts....
 
Antikythera Mechanism mystery turns 115
Posted 5-17-2017 | 11 comments
It has been over a century since the ancient device was found in a shipwreck off the coast of Greece....
 
Burial chamber of Egyptian princess found
Posted 5-14-2017 | 15 comments
Archaeologists have made a fascinating discovery inside a 3,800-year-old pyramid in Dahshur, Egypt....
 
Did the biblical Tower of Babel really exist ?
Posted 5-12-2017 | 30 comments
A stone tablet discovered 100 years ago in Babylon may confirm the existence of the Tower of Babel....
 
Did Vikings bury, cremate 'dead' houses ?
Posted 4-30-2017 | 2 comments
There is evidence to suggest that Viking longhouses were 'buried' by being covered in mounds of Earth....
 
Ancient carvings confirm deadly comet strike
Posted 4-21-2017 | 837 comments
Symbols found at Gobekli Tepe seem to confirm that a comet struck the Earth in the year 10,950 B.C....
 
Mystery Leonardo da Vinci 'relics' discovered
Posted 4-21-2017 | 3 comments
Researchers in Italy have located two undisclosed 'relics' that once belonged to da Vinci himself....
 
Five 'lost' archbishops found beneath church
Posted 4-16-2017 | 6 comments
The remains of five former Archbishops of Canterbury have been unearthed under a medieval parish church....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ