Friday, December 9, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Should 'killer robots' be banned ?


Posted on Thursday, 22 November, 2012 | Comment icon 46 comments


Image credit: Northrop Grumman

 
A human rights organisation has called for the complete ban of autonomous robotic weapon platforms.

As robots become more advanced, armed forces are finding new ways to turn them in to automated weapons for use in dangerous combat zones. While we're still a long way from the killer cyborgs of the Terminator movies series, concerns are being raised over the potential for future robots to be given full autonomy in deciding what constitutes a viable target. Nicknamed 'killer robots', such weapons platforms would be so dangerous that a blanket ban on their usage has already been suggested.

"Giving machines the power to decide who lives and dies on the battlefield would take technology too far," said Steve Goose of Human Rights Watch. "Human control of robotic warfare is essential to minimizing civilian deaths and injuries."

"Governments should pre-emptively ban fully autonomous weapons because of the danger they pose to civilians in armed conflict, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today."

  View: Full article |  Source: hrw.org

  Discuss: View comments (46)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #37 Posted by DieChecker on 26 November, 2012, 21:18
I'm voting YES on robot soldiers, but NO on higher autonomous functions. A human needs to be in the Loop to say "Yes, that target needs to be hit.". Personnally I think it will eventually get much worse... maybe with Robot Soldier operations outsourcing to India, Brazil, or some such place. "Blam! Blam! Blam! .... Thank you, come again." Seriously though, the Romans eventually had to oursource their militarys, and eventually the US will too. Then we're totally skrewed. I saw an article the other day that the Average... average, PC or Console gamer is theoretically better at remote surgery then... [More]
Comment icon #38 Posted by FlyingAngel on 26 November, 2012, 23:22
I'm voting YES on robot soldiers, but NO on higher autonomous functions. A human needs to be in the Loop to say "Yes, that target needs to be hit.". Like ordering shooting all targets that wear black and green soldier uniform? Oh wait, there are babies and women that wear black and green clothes too. It's still can be blamed for malfunction, like ordering to shoot target A but it shoots B instead.
Comment icon #39 Posted by DieChecker on 27 November, 2012, 2:39
Like ordering shooting all targets that wear black and green soldier uniform? Oh wait, there are babies and women that wear black and green clothes too. It's still can be blamed for malfunction, like ordering to shoot target A but it shoots B instead. You must not be talking to me. I was clear in that I said HUMANS should be reponsible for the trigger pull. If babies are being killed then it is a soldier somewhere showing bad discression, not a computer program. This is why our Boys in Afghanistan are always getting shot at, with few shots fired back. They can't shoot back unless they can see ... [More]
Comment icon #40 Posted by marcos anthony toledo on 27 November, 2012, 15:09
Dalaks, Cylons anyone we already have problems with trigger happly vedio game soldiers who think they are playing war games killing innocent civilians around the world this would only make this problem worse than it is this program must be stop whide there still time for the sake of our desendants safety.
Comment icon #41 Posted by -M7 on 28 November, 2012, 0:43
This topic is substantially arguable. Perhaps its because of our lack of complete understanding of cyberspace.
Comment icon #42 Posted by DieChecker on 28 November, 2012, 1:51
Dalaks, Cylons anyone we already have problems with trigger happly vedio game soldiers who think they are playing war games killing innocent civilians around the world this would only make this problem worse than it is this program must be stop whide there still time for the sake of our desendants safety. Daleks are actually octopus like critters inside a trashcan shaped suit of power armor.
Comment icon #43 Posted by FlyingAngel on 28 November, 2012, 12:57
You must not be talking to me. I was clear in that I said HUMANS should be reponsible for the trigger pull. If babies are being killed then it is a soldier somewhere showing bad discression, not a computer program. Good in theory but not in practice. The view range of robots are limited. You can probably step on babies or children without knowing it. Humans have ears that could detect who's attacking behind. If controlling a robot is just about a screen, a speaker and a mouse to shoot like in video games, then there's nothing good about it excepts that it has an armor and the soldier is not ac... [More]
Comment icon #44 Posted by DieChecker on 28 November, 2012, 21:45
Good in theory but not in practice. The view range of robots are limited. You can probably step on babies or children without knowing it. Humans have ears that could detect who's attacking behind. If controlling a robot is just about a screen, a speaker and a mouse to shoot like in video games, then there's nothing good about it excepts that it has an armor and the soldier is not actually there. It's still too easy to kill a robot. Once the enemies know the weak point, what's left of a robot is a piece of metal. Because every robot looks the same, it's impossible to determine who's responsible... [More]
Comment icon #45 Posted by CuriousGreek on 3 December, 2012, 16:32
C'mon guys, what have the poor defenseless robots ever done to you? They have feelings too you know. It would be interesting to see how they would perform however I'm not sure if they would ever be used with full autonomy. Yeah, but sometime robots might stop being defenseless and they might try to take control over the world (wanting to rule humans and everything on this planet). People have feelings too, but you see everyday what is happening in the world. Robots must be used to help Humanity, not destroying it and i'm afraid that it might someday happen, if they're given complete freedom.
Comment icon #46 Posted by DieChecker on 3 December, 2012, 21:47
Making a robot autonomus is different from giving a robot Free Will. It would be a robot with free will that would be dangerous, as it would make its own decisions based on experience, and the ethics and morals it developes from those experiences. An autonomus robot is just like a car building robot that exactly follows software commands. There is no driver, but there is also no choices. A = red, which leads to firing a rocket. B = blue, which leads to locking safetys on all ordinance. And so on. A robot with free will would decide on its own, based on thousands of variables... not compared to... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5827669
263605
164372

 
New Rendlesham UFO witness comes forward
12-9-2016
A former security police officer has described the object he witnessed that night as 'not of this world'.
Legendary astronaut John Glenn dies aged 95
12-9-2016
Glenn became a national hero back in 1962 when he became the first American ever to orbit the Earth.
Actual dinosaur tail found preserved in amber
12-8-2016
The unprecedented 99 million-year-old specimen contains preserved bones, soft tissues and feathers.
Mars One delays first manned mission to Mars
12-8-2016
The Netherlands-based firm has pushed back its ambitious plans by several years due to funding issues.
Other news in this category
Germany's nuclear fusion reactor really works
Posted 12-6-2016 | 23 comments
Scientists have confirmed that the experimental machine is operating with 'unprecedented accuracy'....
 
AI predicts the future by watching videos
Posted 12-5-2016 | 8 comments
An artificial intelligence is learning how to anticipate what is going to happen in the next few seconds....
 
Global warming 'beyond point of no return'
Posted 12-2-2016 | 55 comments
A groundbreaking new study suggests that scientists have underestimated the impact of climate change....
 
'Breakthrough' will make chocolate healthier
Posted 12-1-2016 | 9 comments
Swiss food giant Nestle has found a way to reduce sugar in chocolate by 40% without affecting the taste....
 
Today's androids aren't realistic enough
Posted 11-29-2016 | 21 comments
It takes the average person only 0.25 seconds to tell that an android is not an actual human being....
 
Can being cold really give you the cold ?
Posted 11-29-2016 | 14 comments
It has long been considered something of an old wives' tale, but could there really be some truth to it ?...
 
Parallel universes are real, claim scientists
Posted 11-28-2016 | 56 comments
The 'many interacting worlds' theory ties quantum physics to the idea of countless parallel universes....
 
Melanesian DNA hints at mystery hominid
Posted 11-27-2016 | 3 comments
Hints of an unknown species of human have been found in the DNA of the modern day Melanesian people....
 
13% chance of doomsday, claims maths expert
Posted 11-25-2016 | 18 comments
Dr Fergus Simpson maintains that humanity has a 13% chance of going extinct before the century is out....
 
Ice cream for breakfast 'makes you smarter'
Posted 11-25-2016 | 27 comments
A Japanese scientist has revealed that eating the frozen dessert for breakfast boosts mental performance....
 
New UK law enables mass online surveillance
Posted 11-22-2016 | 98 comments
The 'Investigatory Powers Act' means that from now on, nothing you do or say online will ever be private....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ