Wednesday, July 8, 2015   |   6,478 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Did the Earth once have two moons ?


Posted on Sunday, 7 July, 2013 | Comment icon 22 comments


Image credit: sxc.hu

 
It is believed that there was more than one moon in orbit around the Earth shortly after its formation.

The Earth the Moon are thought to have formed somewhere between 30 and 130 million years after the formation of the solar system around 4.6 billion years ago. During that process it is quite possible that more than one moon formed around the planet and that the moon we see today is actually the result of a collision between the two.

"The second moon would have lasted for only a few million years; then it would have collided with the moon to leave the one large body we see today," said Professor Erik Asphaug. "It would have orbited Earth at the same speed and distance and just got slowly sucked in until they hit and then coalesced."

"The Earthís moon may once have not been on its own, according to lunar scientists."

  View: Full article |  Source: Telegraph

  Discuss: View comments (22)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #13 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 8 July, 2013, 13:25
We had a second (natural) moon, albeit temporarily, as recently as 2007. The asteroid entered Earth orbit in 2006, made 4 orbits and was then ejected again. It's very temporary nature as a second moon means that it is not really regarded as such and is designated an asteroid.. An object called was discovered orbiting the Earth in September 2002 and was ejected again in June 2003, however this is believed to be man made, probably the third stage of the Apollo 12 Saturn V mission from 1969. It may enter Earth orbit again in 2032. Finally there is an object called which was discove... [More]
Comment icon #14 Posted by d e v i c e on 8 July, 2013, 13:53
That's very interesting and eye opening too. Thanks very much Waspie_Dwarf.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 8 July, 2013, 14:26
Apart from J002E3 it was stuff I didn't know either. You learn something new every day.
Comment icon #16 Posted by shrooma on 9 July, 2013, 6:58
have people stopped calling cruithne our `2nd moon` now then....? poor thing seems to have gone theway of pluto! 'alas poor cruithne, we knew him briefly.....' :-)
Comment icon #17 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 9 July, 2013, 7:27
Astronomers never did. It is not in Earth orbit so, by definition, is not a natural satellite. It orbits the sun in a resonant orbit with Earth.
Comment icon #18 Posted by shrooma on 9 July, 2013, 8:00
i know they didn't Waspie, i heard the alarm go off every time alan davis mentioned it on QI..... :-)
Comment icon #19 Posted by Lex540 on 10 July, 2013, 8:48
impossible unrealistic
Comment icon #20 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 10 July, 2013, 10:49
Would you care to elaborate? Could you share the data you used to come to this conclusion? As Professor Erik Asphaug (who, incidentally is a leading expert on asteroids, comets and impacts) won't be giving details about his hypothesis until September I don't see how you can discount it as unrealistic when you don't even know what it is you are discounting.
Comment icon #21 Posted by JMPD1 on 10 July, 2013, 20:19
Fascinating theory, I'll have to look Professor Asphaugs paper in September. Highly likely, in my humble opinion, since the young solar system was full of matter, and small bodies would be accreting loose material and then losing it in collisions with other bodies.
Comment icon #22 Posted by spud the mackem on 10 July, 2013, 20:20
Hi Waspie, Re your reprimand (no hard feelings),I Don't care what happened millions of years ago, because we cannot change it, but I do care about what may happen in the future,just for info I have followed my hero Sir Patrick for over 45 years and still receive the Sky At Night magazine,and have over 40 c.d's on Astronomy,so I do care on certain astronomical events,but please don't "slag off" someone who makes a comment,on an issue which cannot be proven, and never will be.I have noticed that you tend to go into "attack" mode on other peoples comments as we... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Other recent forum topics
Forum icon 
Other news in this category
5 billion-year-old deep space signal detected
Posted 7-7-2015 | 9 comments
Astronomers in Australia have picked up cosmic radio waves originating from a distant galaxy....
 
NASA's New Horizons probe suffers anomaly
Posted 7-5-2015 | 22 comments
Just 10 days away from reaching Pluto the spacecraft has suffered an unexplained communications failure....
 
Will the universe rip itself to pieces ?
Posted 7-4-2015 | 9 comments
An event known as 'the Big Rip' could ultimately see the cosmos being torn apart in the distant future....
 
'Boomerang' drone could fly around on Mars
Posted 7-1-2015 | 4 comments
Scientists have developed a prototype of a strange new boomerang-shaped aircraft for use on Mars....
 
A black hole could turn you in to a hologram
Posted 6-30-2015 | 23 comments
Scientists have come up with a novel new way to account for what happens inside a black hole....
 
Life could thrive in alternative universes
Posted 6-29-2015 | 19 comments
Some universes might provide conditions more favorable to the development of life than our own....
 
Rosetta finds exposed water ice on comet
Posted 6-28-2015 | 3 comments
The Rosetta spacecraft has found what appears to be patches of ice on the surface of comet 67P....
 
'Pyramid-shaped' mountain found on Ceres
Posted 6-25-2015 | 60 comments
NASA's Dawn spacecraft has identified an anomalous structure on the surface of the dwarf planet....
 
Nukes could be used to deflect asteroids
Posted 6-23-2015 | 14 comments
NASA is looking in to the possibility of using nuclear weapons to defend Earth against asteroid impacts....
 
Humans unlikely to ruin hunt for life on Mars
Posted 6-22-2015 | 7 comments
Researchers have concluded that a manned mission to Mars is unlikely to contaminate the planet....
 
Mars-like extrasolar planet discovered
Posted 6-20-2015 | 3 comments
Astronomers have identified a planet the size of Mars orbiting a star 200 light years from the Earth....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ