Monday, April 29, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Space & Astronomy > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Space & Astronomy

Fireball planet orbits star in 8.5 hours

By T.K. Randall
August 20, 2013 · Comment icon 11 comments

Image Credit: NASA/ESA
A newly discovered Earth-sized world around a distant star completes a full orbit in a matter of hours.
Dubbed Kepler 78b, the small world orbits its parent star at a distance 40 times closer than Mercury's orbit of our own sun. Not only does this produce an extremely short orbital period but the planet itself is a smouldering, hellish world with temperatures exceeding 3,000 Kelvin. By contrast, Mercury's maximum surface temperature peaks at around 700 Kelvin.

The newly discovered planet has a few other surprises in store as well. It is the first time scientists have been able to directly observe light from a planet of this size and because of its tight orbit, it is believed that it may be possible to determine its mass, a feat never achieved before for a planet outside of our own solar system.
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have discovered a new, Earth-sized exoplanet for which orbiting its star is literally all in a day's work.


Source: The Register | Comments (11)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #2 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago
As close to its star as this planet is, I am surprised the stars gravitational pull didn't suck it right into itself. It doesn't work like that. If the orbital velocity is correct then theoretically you could orbit 2 inches above the star. In reality that can't happen. Stars have an atmosphere and if the planet orbits within this then drag will slow the planet and that will cause it to spiral into the star. Also there is the Roche Limit. If the planet orbits lower than the stars Roche limit then tidal forces will tear it apart.
Comment icon #3 Posted by Ryu 11 years ago
Yeah, with a velocity like that I suppose the planets orbit can be maintained for quite some time. But what about the slingshot effect. With a high velocity rate, isn't it possible for the planet to be flung away at some point?
Comment icon #4 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago
But what about the slingshot effect. With a high velocity rate, isn't it possible for the planet to be flung away at some point? Again it doesn't work like that. If an object is in orbit it means that the force trying to make it fly away from the object it is orbit around (inertia) is balanced by the force trying to pull it into the object it is orbiting (gravity). They will remain balanced unless another force acts on them.
Comment icon #5 Posted by Sundew 11 years ago
As close to its star as this planet is, I am surprised the stars gravitational pull didn't suck it right into itself. Anyways, that was pretty neat to read. Again science learns more and more each day. At our galactic center stars are racing around a black hole as well, and while the BH may be pulling gases off their surfaces and "consuming" the gas, despite the intense gravitation (billions of times that of our sun), they do not just fall into the black hole, they orbit it. It would take some other object, say another star, passing close by to change the orbit of the star in question, in whic... [More]
Comment icon #6 Posted by pallidin 11 years ago
Amazing. I like how, even after being(somewhat out-of-service) that there is more previous data to pour over and examine. I say "somewhat" because even though 2 out the 4 gyros have failed, I think I heard that they are considering using the onboard mini-thrusters to somewhat stabilize the telescope for additional imaging. Maybe Waspie has more info on that.
Comment icon #7 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf 11 years ago
I say "somewhat" because even though 2 out the 4 gyros have failed, I think I heard that they are considering using the onboard mini-thrusters to somewhat stabilize the telescope for additional imaging. Maybe Waspie has more info on that. Basically Kepler's planet hunting days are over. NASA is looking into what useful mission it could now carry out. There is more info HERE.
Comment icon #8 Posted by brlesq1 11 years ago
What a great article. Too bad Kepler failed.
Comment icon #9 Posted by Rolci 11 years ago
So what WOULDN'T melt on the surface?
Comment icon #10 Posted by shrooma 11 years ago
So what WOULDN'T melt on the surface? . Adamantium. Superman's underpants. margaret thatcher's heart. a frozen 20lb turkey at 11am on christmas morning..... ;-)
Comment icon #11 Posted by spacecowboy342 11 years ago
At our galactic center stars are racing around a black hole as well, and while the BH may be pulling gases off their surfaces and "consuming" the gas, despite the intense gravitation (billions of times that of our sun), they do not just fall into the black hole, they orbit it. It would take some other object, say another star, passing close by to change the orbit of the star in question, in which case it might fall in, be flung away, or merely change its orbit. Just think of the earth's orbit around our own sun, or the moon around the earth, on our time scale, the orbits are very stable. We do... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Top 10 trending mysteries
Recent news and articles